Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 300
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Shame you're not doing Nats Ghosty.

Come and watch at least.

Gonna at least do bust-a-nut 2 in August?

Narh I am not interested in competing in powerlifting and my views on the subject are pretty negative so I won't go into them.

Pretty sure I'll be there to watch and help out where I can and be suportive of fellow lifters though.

Edited by GHOSTrun
Ghosty is mentally strong too. or maybe just mental.

Probably the latter, at times I'm the biggest sooky-la-la, nothing mentally strong there hahaha.

anyone who has tried 20 rep squats even with just body weight will know the pain in the arms, shoulders, back, the lower back.. my god the lower back pump pain...

the pins and needles, the shakes, the lungs.. lol

anytime I do 20s, I have to lie down afterwards.

just so draining.

Yeah the legs handle the weight easy, it's the lower and upper back that fatigue and cause failure. The forearms, wrists and hands start to go numb and when you can't hold the bar tight against your back it wrecks your form and contributes towards failing. It certainly is a tough exercise, but feels so rewarding when you accomplish.

I only did 2 work sets that session, not because that's all I wanted to do, but because if I kept going I would have vommited, and I'm sick of all that shit it's not worth the hassel and waste of food lol.

I never squat and DL in the same session, the lower back pump is too much

Do you reckon there's any danger to it? Have thought about putting them on different days, but as I have a split routine, I like to have one day allocated to lower back stuff. I can feel it bad straight after the exercises, but once I've left the gym I'm sweet again.

Do you reckon there's any danger to it? Have thought about putting them on different days, but as I have a split routine, I like to have one day allocated to lower back stuff. I can feel it bad straight after the exercises, but once I've left the gym I'm sweet again.

I don't see a danger, just lack of performance because you're already fatigued. I mean obvioulsy common sense must prevail, if you try and lift a weight you are not in the state to do so then yeah possiblity of injury, but that should go without saying.

Edited by GHOSTrun

I might try sticking an exercise between them, it's a good idea. I do this with lat pulldowns between flat bench and incline to give the chest/shoulders a bit of a rest.

I don't see a danger, just lack of performance because you're already fatigued. I mean obvioulsy common sense must prevail, if you try and lift a weight you are not in the state to do so then yeah possiblity of injury, but that should go without saying.

I thought as much. The only concern for me has been whether I'm leaning too far forward during squats because my back is fatigued from deads. My friends have told me it looks fine but the paranoia is there.

long quads usually means leaning forward more.

can't change that.

Do them in a cage and at least you can dump the bar on to the safety bars if needed.

Also, I'd suggest doing deads after squats.

if the back is fatigued, then it's easier to let go of a bar than to get stuck under it if you get what I mean.

Same reason why in powerlifting they have the lifts in the order of Squat (when you're fresh), then a liedown rest for Bench, then Deadlift for all the glory.

I do deads on leg day as I do back the day before and found my lower back DOMS holding me back on squats. So now I squat then calf raise then dead.

Haven't done legs/deads for 3 weeks due to injury so read into that what u want, but I was doing it for a fair while without issue

Seeing a musculoskeletal therapist tonight to see what's up, and hopefully back into the legs ASAP

Are squats supposed to be harder for people with long legs? I hope so...

Good news for you Birds.Are they harder for someone your height? no not really.

I'm 6ft 3 and it's not a problem, I've only just started back on them after a very long break. Squats are just a draining compound movement.

The other day I was doing 130kg (which I had to lift off the deck due to doing them at home = extra work). 2 sets of hack (bar on the upper chest) for 12 reps and 2 sets of regular squats , nice and deep.

I was totally wrecked even though the weight was no trouble but, looking at the Ghosty workout volume makes me feel nauseous. :sick:

Edited by rev210

starting strength by Mark Rippetoe has sq, bench and dead on one day, then squat OH press and Power clean on the nexrt session.

the bench session between squats and deads allows for your lower back to settle some what.

Yeah this is good advice

I spread mine out a little more as I have a few other go to movements I like that are real drainers... weighted pull ups/dips, heavy bent over rows or t-bar rows and explosive movements done with kettlebells or dumbbells/barbells... more athletic orientated stuff for speed not just all strength, although that is always the base that the program is designed around

Tue I squatted with bench press and pullups etc... yesterday I started with powercleans, supersetted with OHP then into bent over rows etc... next it might be DL followed by some dumbbell pressing movements, dips (I try not to do too many pull movements after DL as my grip is usually shagged)

anyway enough whoring... back to quadzilla's training log;)

long quads usually means leaning forward more.

can't change that.

Do them in a cage and at least you can dump the bar on to the safety bars if needed.

Also, I'd suggest doing deads after squats.

if the back is fatigued, then it's easier to let go of a bar than to get stuck under it if you get what I mean.

Same reason why in powerlifting they have the lifts in the order of Squat (when you're fresh), then a liedown rest for Bench, then Deadlift for all the glory.

I might try this.

Good news for you Birds.Are they harder for someone your height? no not really.

I'm 6ft 3 and it's not a problem, I've only just started back on them after a very long break. Squats are just a draining compound movement.

The other day I was doing 130kg (which I had to lift off the deck due to doing them at home = extra work). 2 sets of hack (bar on the upper chest) for 12 reps and 2 sets of regular squats , nice and deep.

I was totally wrecked even though the weight was no trouble but, looking at the Ghosty workout volume makes me feel nauseous. :sick:

I don't have any issues doing squats (besides the DOMS from doing deadlifts prior), I was just asking if longer legs meant the same weight would require more effort than from someone with short legs...by principles of torque alone I think it's true. It's not a cop out or an excuse not to lift heavier and I'm not trying to take anything away from Mike's workout, just trying to assert a comparison limitation for my own workouts and progress.

I find deadlifts way more taxing on the CNS than any other lift, when I deadlift it's normally at least 7-10 days+ before my back feels good to do it again (this may be exagerated by two buldging discs and the inflamation etc but that's what I find).

Birds are you squatting/deadlifting primarily for strength or for hypertrophy? If it's the latter, according to a video I watched by Kai Green on BB training, he says the weight is less important, it's more about the muscle contraction and stretch. So if that's your goal, I reckon don't go so heavy that it taxes your CNS a lot, just put enough on so you feel a good stretch and contraction from the lift, you'll probably find you can train it more often then as well and it won't have such a detrimental effect on squats. But I also wouldn't be squatting/deadlifting on the same day if you're moving some decent weight, rather do them on seperate days. For novices it's ok because the weight isn't heavy enough to tax the CNS where it requires extended periods of time to recover, which is what starting strength is aimed it isn't it (beginners)? *although I have read many seasoned lifters still do that routine everynow and then for a change. **I haven't read it so just guessing here.

great post

definitely something not right with your back to still be sore a week later... but I agree I find DL the most taxing of all the lifts... closely followed by powercleans and the variations... both require a lot of concentration which tires me mentally

I don't have any issues doing squats (besides the DOMS from doing deadlifts prior), I was just asking if longer legs meant the same weight would require more effort than from someone with short legs...by principles of torque alone I think it's true. It's not a cop out or an excuse not to lift heavier and I'm not trying to take anything away from Mike's workout, just trying to assert a comparison limitation for my own workouts and progress.

Sorry birds , meant as an encouragement not as criticism. I think there are swings and roundabouts to the equation as far as limb and muscle dimensions are concerned. Bottom line is I believe you could lift some serious weights if that became a goal for you at any time. The worlds strongest man comp. has a long list of guys taller than you that tend to squat large weights (roids aside). Brian Shaw is 6ft 8. all of them are 6ft or more. Again not that you want to become the unit but, just to say your height is not a disadvantage in any way compared to those of smaller stature.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...