Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

you haters are crazy.

id love to see 2 r33 turbos in a twin set up.

less laggy, more useable power on the street then a big big single.

who cares if they end up breaking, they are cheap as piss to replace.

And you can build the setup for under a grand easily.

you haters are crazy.

id love to see 2 r33 turbos in a twin set up.

less laggy, more useable power on the street then a big big single.

who cares if they end up breaking, they are cheap as piss to replace.

And you can build the setup for under a grand easily.

Not less laggy. More laggy. You're using turbos designed for 2.5L and only running them with 1.5L. And then you still have crappy ceramic wheels that can't reliably take more than 12psi at the most.

And who cares if they blow? You realize there is the possibility of taking the motor with them right?

Edited by Hanaldo

I agree. More lag, and much more risk of losing an engine. If a wheel explodes when you're offend throttle at high revs, with the throttle body shut, and the ability for the engine to suck back from the exhaust, if it pulled some bits of turbo into the cylinder, boom.

You'll have about a $3k rebuild on your hands. New pistons, rings, bearings, bore, hone, etc.

Standards really are a bad idea. Especially with unknown kms

i disagree, for starters, whats wrong with just running 12 psi?? you have the potential to make minimum 300kw and it will definately make that power earlier in the rev range then a big single will.

also, a huge amount of people push more then 12psi through 33 turbos all day anyway with no issue, chances of damaging motor... slim.

i think its a good idea, cheap easy driveable power.

go for it!

Not less laggy. More laggy. You're using turbos designed for 2.5L and only running them with 1.5L. And then you still have crappy ceramic wheels that can't reliably take more than 12psi at the most.

And who cares if they blow? You realize there is the possibility of taking the motor with them right?

Lol of course I have "done my homework" and if I wanted to (and kept the missus happy) I could go out and buy whatever setup i chose tomorrow, paid in cash. I've already posted how much this is going to cost. I don't pay a mechanic or a welder/fabricator to work on it as I have extensive experience in these industries. The flanges are in the mail as I type and should arrive this week. It will be built as soon as all the parts arrive. As most are aware the r33 s2 turbo spools up real early. Maybe some have forgotten what a stock turbo feels like on a 25. On a 30 it will be way to small. Hence 2 turbo's. I just went for a drive to see how early the single spools up. 4th gear from about 40 kph. 12 psi at 2200. 14.5psi at 2500 rpm. I could probably get it to spool 100 rpm earlier with a change in the tune but it might be a bit hot. Also that is with only a bleed valve and a spring on the outside of the actuator that holds 9.5 psi. Those pressures are at the manifold btw. I tried holding the brake and it went to 14.5 at 2300. Have a look here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYW_7gltGVo Its a bit wonky but if you pause it you can see it. If you see my other one its a bit old.

If you want original, why not three?

Believe me I had that idea already. Intake and exhaust piping isn't that much more difficult to knock up so to speak. It would be a tight fit tho. I haven't researched 3 either, ie :which turbos to use. I'll stick with 2 for now. I've sussed it all out and it should work pretty good.

88cameron88, this was actually a 2.5 litre. With a well set up gt3076, water meth injection, and lots of tuning to perfection done by me, it was a weapon.

I think in the lower gears it was a little higher. More like 4,000 rpm to make 12psi.

But, I think our friend here that says he's done his homework doesn't realise that when my gt3076 is making 12psi, it's a lot more flow than his standard turbo at 12psi.

Hence why all if the reasoning here is poorly thought out.

Standards early? No.

R33 bush turbo spooling earlier than a ball bearing Garrett? No.

Laggy? Yes.

Risky? Yes.

Time wasting? My opinion, yes. More time wasted stuffing around with a setup that won't work instead of driving it on a track.

well I reckon we can start placing bets on this.

I'll take 'Its never gunna happen' for the win :laugh:

Ok bud. You're on. But since you wont pay up when you lose so you can just look like a cock instead. :thumbsup: I'll keep ya posted lol

Whilst I still side with the majority on the silliness of the idea, one point comes to mind ref the boost limits and safety.

If 12psi is the sensible limit on the standard turbo on 2.5 litres, then you will be able to run much more boost at the same shaft speed when it's only working a 1.5 litre half engine. Just like using a 25 turbo on a 20, only better. Higher boost = higher exhaust temperatures of course, especially with tuning that is leaner than standard, so perhaps you can't drive them up to silly high boost (or what seems silly when talking about these turbos), but it should at least be a lot less likely to spit turbines off at 12psi than we've all been assuming so far.

That said, if you (the OP) are still intent on doing twins, for christ's sake, don't use Nissan turbos. The TD04s I talked about are just as plentiful, just as cheap, physically smaller and better suited to pairing up on a 2.5L.

Geez calm down everyone. I'm going to do this no matter what. I couldn't give two f**ks if its better or worse than anything else. Its just something to do that cost bugger all. Refer to the initial question.Tha'ts all I was thinking about. I have researched out the arse. I know that other setups work better. I don't care either. IVF works better than sex so are you all going to give up rooting? I thought not. :iluvff:

Only if you're trying to make babies. And if you're aiming to do that every time you have sex, then you're doing it wrong.

I think there's a message in there for you.

We're actually trying for a baby atm. But tha'ts a bit off topic isn't it. This twin setup isn't anything that I or anyone should lose sleep over. I'm doing it for fun. It will work no doubt. Might not compare to new ball bearing turbos. Doesn't matter tho. Just out of curiosity....who here has done this or are we all guessing, no matter how educated the guess may be?

But, I think our friend here that says he's done his homework doesn't realise that when my gt3076 is making 12psi, it's a lot more flow than his standard turbo at 12psi.

Mate if you reckon that then how could I have any idea about how to do this? What am I 15 :no:?

Hence why all if the reasoning here is poorly thought out. Who mentioned reasoning? Like I said its for cheap fun.

Standards early? No. Never said it would be. Guessing about 4k at full boost with ebc.

R33 bush turbo spooling earlier than a ball bearing Garrett? No. Never said this either

Laggy? Yes. Slightly less than twice as much as standard

Risky? Yes. Half as risky as standard.

Time wasting? My opinion, yes. More time wasted stuffing around with a setup that won't work instead of driving it on a track. Not interested in a track mate. If doing car stuff is a waste of time catch a bus or walk.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...