Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello guys and girls. I have up for sale a KAKIMOTO Full HyperMega N1 90mm cat back stainless steel exhaust.

The exhaust itself is in two parts, the first connecting to the cat or de-cat pipe through a 3.5" bore 2 hole flange, this then converts into the 3.5" pipe work which leads to a 3.5" kakimoto 4 hole flange. The second part connects to the first part via a 3.5" kakimoto 4 hole flange, and continues through 3.5" pipe work into the muffler which then opens into a 112mm exit tip.

•PRICE $500•

Specs

- Thin-walled lightweight Stainless-Steel

- Rear muffler tip is 112mm (4.5")

- Piping is 90mm (3.5")

- One 'mid-muffler' - see pics.

- Better than the HKS equivalents as they are either Mild Steel piping or have a huge mid-muffler that quietens the exhaust note to almost silence.

From the cat flange to middle muffler is wrapped in exhaust heat wrap to keep heat away from gearbox .

This exhaust is like brand new and sounds amazing on. A GTR . It will suit any R33 GTST/GTR . I wanted a something with a better RB sound so I got this . But my plans are changed and car is coming off road for some major mods which include a titanium exhaust .

b8f7e48c.jpg

173321c1.jpg

c57f3820.jpg

These exhausts may a great sound and I would suggest what you have would be well tolerable for the street.

Just tip the really loud version is the Hyper 2000 Full Maga N1. It only has a small resonator (hot dog) mid way down the exhaust and with big dumps and front pipes is something to behold - shrinking violets need not apply. Attached a pic for reference.

GL with the sale - Great price - someone will pick up a great system.

Kak.pdf

Are you sure it's for a r33?

The last picture at the tip of the catback the hangers/brackets arent right.

Looks to be r32 position.

That exhaust came off my car a few weeks ago. I can tell you it is for a R33 GTR.

It's 100% off a s3 GTR and put right back only my s3 GTR and will fit any r33 , the s3 have larger diff ( in pic ) and sti fits perfect . It's great on street and sounds like porn

These exhausts may a great sound and I would suggest what you have would be well tolerable for the street.

Just tip the really loud version is the Hyper 2000 Full Maga N1. It only has a small resonator (hot dog) mid way down the exhaust and with big dumps and front pipes is something to behold - shrinking violets need not apply. Attached a pic for reference.

GL with the sale - Great price - someone will pick up a great system.

That exhaust came off my car a few weeks ago. I can tell you it is for a R33 GTR.

Simon, this-s-s-s is the R34 one!

Yes "WRRR" the really loud one is...

Terry-39.jpg

Terry-40.jpg

And as "Piggaz" says, Glen's one being advertised above, is for the R33 GT-R; and when Paul took me around the street with it on, that RB sound was magnificent to behold!

It's a great buy for some lucky fellah! I would call Glen now!

Terry

I know the really loud one well - mine is hanging up in the shed with the big custom dumps/front pipes and big cat.

My window tint wasn't dark enough. Fitted a Nismo NE1, quieter but lost a bit of sting :(

Glen's version would sound great and not be to OTT.

Back to business as we're whoring glen's thread - great buy - do it someone.

Edited by WRRR

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...