Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Poncams Type B - limited use (no marks, present as new)

RB26 head, less than 10k km since complete rebuild.

Head is complete minus manifolds and covers.

Comes off my running rb26 - had no untoward valvetrain noise, cam clearances are spot on etc. This head with the type B poncams was making ~400rwkw with a gt35.

I also have the standard cams so you can option the head with poncams or standard cams, or purchase the cams on there own (Poncams retain the standard base circle and are straight fit!).

RB26 Head with poncams $1450 / RB26 Head with standard cams $950 / Tomei Type B Poncams $550

Pick-up in Perth, buyer pays shipping otherwise.

pm or email [email protected]

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/376279-fs-rb26-poncams-type-b-rb26-head/
Share on other sites

The head was built by the previous owner with all std parts from Nissan.

Ahh ok fair call. I think i really need to put stainless/iconel valves and bronze valve guides in my head to suit what i'm doing. So a factory head rebuild would not suit me.

Question though, do you have a picture of the power/torque/boost dyno read out of your engine? I know an internally stock RB26 with a GT35 will do 400kW. But i'm chasing the same sort of figures with a 3076 for my RB26. So it would be interesting to see so i can work out how much head work i need to do to get the power where i want it.

Cheers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I hadn't thought about the variable power steering assist. Presumably, it will always be the same level of assist as you get in an S14. The R32/3/4 are either helliishly heavy (at low speeds) if the solenoid is not powered at all, or hellishly too light (at high speed) if it is powered all the time. I presume that it is PWM controlled on those cars. I hadn't thought about the S cars not having variable assist. ugh. What crappy plebby cars they must be!  
    • Hmm yeah that is a good point. It looks like it'll just bolt in with no real issue besides maybe the bushings being different. My other concern was that 2 pin plug that I assume is used in some way to control the rack solenoid depending on the speed signal from the ecu. The DMAX rack doesn't even have that plug though so, don't think it'll matter. Might just order the rack and see how it goes. Will update this when I figure something out
    • I'd say it's a fair bet that the feed and return fluid lines will be in different enough spots that you would need to come up with a way to cut the originals short and adapt with new hard line adaption or braided teflon hoses or somesuch. But really, you have the car, you have the photos of the DMAX rack - you should be able to go out there and see for yourself whether they're in the same or different spots.
    • I've been doing some looking around and honestly was just considering throwing a new rack at it. I saw that the dmax silvia rack bolts up into the 33 with the silvia bushings but not sure if the high pressure lines will sit in the correct spot. I believe other version of the 33 rack are the same/similar to the racks that can be opened up without as much fuss so I assume the dmax rack would fit but any ideas?
    • I've never played with one, but I would expect that you are correct. That slot looks like it is intended to be used to unscrew the end, and the flats on the body would be better than grabbing it around the round bit with a pipe wrench. So, yeah, probably unscrews. You'll probably have to make a tool to drive in that slot.
×
×
  • Create New...