Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep, that's why i'm keen to see the factory map of a vehicle that came BOVless, just like you. What cars were like that again? I never knew there were any

FJ20 cars like DR30s, all turbo HR31 skylines, VL turbos, C32 Laurels, Datsun Z31 300zx and possibly early cefiros (have a redtop with a silvertop cam cover lol).

Edited by Rolls
  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Does anyone realise that whenever 98% of the population hears a BOV, the first thought that goes throught their head is usually "wanker" or "dickhead"...

lol

That fact is it? Funny because I think quite the opposite and do admire a nice Bov or Flutter.

Mafia, how can you prove it's fact when no studies have been placed upon the subject?

Personally I find BOV's awesome, had a HKS one on my line for a few months but removed it as it sounded weird with the old stock exhaust, I had only had it stall a few times on me (maybe it was just a slipping clutch?) but in my opinion it was worth it.

Just my 2 cents.

The stalling can be avoided with a different driving style. Mo old skylines had atmo BOV and would only stall if u clutched in above say 3000rpm and let it return to idle.

So to avoid it use the engine braking till the engine is below 3000rpm then clutch in and the engine will be able to catch itself becore stalling.

Havent tested this with an atmo BOV but in the ign maps i normally add a few degree's of extra timing in very low rpm area's to help bring the engine rpm up when it tries to stall

I think that having to tune your car and change your driving style, just to sound like a dickhead is the stupidest thing I have ever seen.

It's a MAF system, it's not meant to have a Atmo leak in it. When are you people goin to learn?

If you want to sound stupid, with your car sneezing all the time, get a MAP ECU

But usually, people that are stupid enough to want to chance the bov just for sound dont understand how the air measurement system works...

mafia just stop posting, ironically you are the one who is being a dickhead here.

Sorry mafia but I am agreeing here...

My old r33 with the pfc hated the blocked bov and stalled every time. This car I got now, when it was stock, never stalled and it came with an atmo which I then swapped top a stock blocked bov fluttering day and night without an issue. Even now after jez tuned my car I had my bov blocked and it was awesome. Just a couple of days ago.I've began stalling even with the plumb back bov running... I've got a vacuum leak or my aac is hating life.

Having a blocked bov is just as bad - Nissan designed the car to have it there.

If you, right from square one just left it plumb back, you would have saved time and money to have to tune out the massive air leak in the first place.

So no, im not the dickhead. I'm the educated tuner that knows a MAF system is not meant to have any air escaping from any point past the air flow meter. Anyone that introduces this does not understand how it works, and just wants sound, just to be a dickhead. It's not performance enhancing at all.

And don't use the crap excuse that the tuner "says its ok", you want it, so he'll do it and take your money. He'll even tell you it's ok. If he ever tells you that a MAF system is ok with a ATMO bov, find another tuner. A real tuner will still do it but tell you it's not ideal and go with a MAP engine management system.

People ask me to make their car run better because it's stalling and carrying on - I do it because that's what they want. But certainly not a free tune. I also tell them that it is making a system not work how it is supposed to - and half of them choose not to keep the atmo bov because they understand and want their car to run perfect, and only put it on because some clown said it was better and they didn't know any better themselves. (we were all new at some point)

So - whatever you want to do. But, doing it can only be for noise, and that means you're an attention seeking dickhead. And, ruin it for the rest of us because now cops hate skylines and pull them up just because of that - they are a skyline.

i agree with mafia's thoughts on this

the car should work correctly as it was designed and match the system setup ie ljetro with re-circ value (i dont think any OEM's call it bov)

tuning around the stalling (the purpose of this thread) is a good way to resolve it, but why bother? why not just run the correct re-circ setup?

learning is good and solving complex problem is good but it sounds like a workaround more than anything

The stalling can be avoided with a different driving style. Mo old skylines had atmo BOV and would only stall if u clutched in above say 3000rpm and let it return to idle.

So to avoid it use the engine braking till the engine is below 3000rpm then clutch in and the engine will be able to catch itself becore stalling.

^^^this Thanks

Havent tested this with an atmo BOV but in the ign maps i normally add a few degree's of extra timing in very low rpm area's to help bring the engine rpm up when it tries to stall

Definitions

A typical piston-type dump valve, used in auto racing. Unlike a blowoff valve, this one does not vent to the atmosphere. The small hose at the top is a feed from the intake manifold.

A compressor bypass valve (CBV), also known as a pressure relief valve or diverter valve, is a manifold vacuum-actuated valve designed to release pressure in the intake system of a turbocharged vehicle when the throttle is lifted or closed. This air pressure is re-circulated back into the non-pressurized end of the intake (before the turbo) but after the mass airflow sensor.

A blowoff valve, (sometimes "hooter valve", not to be confused with a bypass valve) performs the same task but releases the air into the atmosphere instead of recirculating it. The blowoff action produces a range of distinctive hissing sounds, depending on the exit design. Some blowoff valves are sold with a trumpet-shaped exit that intentionally amplifies the sound. Some turbocharged vehicle owners may purchase a blowoff valve solely for the auditory effect even when the function is not required by normal engine operation. Motor sports governed by the FIA have made it illegal to vent unmuffled blowoff valves to the atmosphere.[citation needed]

Blowoff valves are used to prevent compressor surge, a phenomenon that readily occurs when lifting off the throttle of an unvented, turbocharged engine. When the throttle plate on a turbocharged engine closes, the high pressure air in the intake system is trapped by the throttle and a pressure wave is forced back into the compressor. The compressor wheel slows rapidly and may even stall, and the driver will notice a fluttering air sound. The rapid slowing or stalling stresses the turbo and imparts severe turbo lag if the driver accelerates immediately after the surge event.

Disadvantages

In the case where a mass airflow sensor (MAF) is used and is located upstream from the blowoff valve, the engine control unit (ECU) will meter out excess fuel because the atmospherically vented air is not subtracted from the intake charge measurements. The engine then briefly operates with a fuel-rich mixture after each valve actuation.

The rich mixing can lead to hesitation or even stalling of the engine when the throttle is closed, a situation that worsens with higher boost pressures. Occasional events of this type may be only a nuisance, but frequent events can eventually foul the spark plugs and destroy the catalytic converter, as the inefficiently combusted fuel produces soot (excess carbon) and unburned fuel in the exhaust flow can produce soot in the converter and drive the converter beyond its normal operating temperature range.

One approach used to mitigate the problem has been to reduce the boost pressure, which reduces the required venting volume and yields less charge over-calculation by the ECU. The air can also be recirculated back into the intake, a typical stock setup for cars with an upstream MAF sensor. The situation can also be corrected by switching the fuel metering system over to a manifold absolute pressure sensor, a conversion that usually requires a compatible aftermarket ECU or piggy-back fuel controller. The MAP sensor monitors the absolute pressure in the manifold at all times and will correctly detect the change that occurs when the valve vents, allowing the ECU to reduce fuel metering accordingly.

Let me understand then what exactly is happening on throttle off. When you come off boost and shut the throttle the air will revirb back and flow through the recirc pipe back into the turbo and stay in the system. Correct? Ok now lets say, just for simple example, the car measured 10 litres of air coming in and allowed 200ml of fuel to be added for this air. The engine does its cycle on boost, burns 8 litres of air and 100ml of fuel. You back off the throttle and the plate shuts with this 2 litres of air still in the intake before the throttle and 100ml of fuel for the counted air. To prevent the car from stalling is this where the AAC valve kicks in? Since the throttle is closed you are going to need to let this air come in to burn this fuel to keep the engine on and from stalling. My car for the last week has been stalling its nut when I come off boost and let the revs drop. I am running a full recirc system.

What is the cause of this stalling state? Ive cleaned the AAC but have not taken it for a drive yet. Am I right when I am saying the engine is using the AAC to let in this air to burn off this fuel? When the throttle is shut, obviously air isnt going to get in there but if there is fuel in the piston its going to need air to burn...

Why do people drive motor bikes with exhausts so loud they can be heard kilometers away? Why do people run screamer pipes? Why do people run straight pipe exhaust? Why do people run titanium exhausts? Its their car. If you run a pod filter, most people are immediately going to say that you have a vented bov because the sound which comes through the BOV, so already you are a dickhead. And these days it doesn't take a BOV to make you a dickhead, people see you in a skyline and label you as a dickhead. Everyone here chose to drive a skyline. Thank your selves you don't live in america driving a jap car.

Let me understand then what exactly is happening on throttle off. When you come off boost and shut the throttle the air will revirb back and flow through the recirc pipe back into the turbo and stay in the system. Correct? Ok now lets say, just for simple example, the car measured 10 litres of air coming in and allowed 200ml of fuel to be added for this air. The engine does its cycle on boost, burns 8 litres of air and 100ml of fuel. You back off the throttle and the plate shuts with this 2 litres of air still in the intake before the throttle and 100ml of fuel for the counted air. To prevent the car from stalling is this where the AAC valve kicks in? Since the throttle is closed you are going to need to let this air come in to burn this fuel to keep the engine on and from stalling. My car for the last week has been stalling its nut when I come off boost and let the revs drop. I am running a full recirc system.

What is the cause of this stalling state? Ive cleaned the AAC but have not taken it for a drive yet. Am I right when I am saying the engine is using the AAC to let in this air to burn off this fuel? When the throttle is shut, obviously air isnt going to get in there but if there is fuel in the piston its going to need air to burn...

AAC valve plays no part. When you are at highish revs (let's say >2000) and you close the throttle, there is enough vacuum in the inlet manifold to keep pulling air past the throttle butterfly regardless of how open the AAC valve is. The high pressure air that is trapped in the inlet tract between the turbo and the throttle also adds to the driving force to push a little air past the throttle and through the AAC valve. This should easily be enough air to keep the engine running when you clutch in for the gear shift. The compressor bypass valve just lets the air go round and round without any air flowing forwards or backwards through the AFM. It is also why the engine usually has a TPS with throttle closed indication so that the ECU can know that regardless of what has just been happening with the rpm and the measured air flow, the engine is now in "gear shift mode" (for want of a better term) and it injects fuel accordingly. If you have a venting BOV then the AFM continues to measure foward flow and that can seriously interfere with the ECU's understanding of what condition the engine is in and it may ignore the TPS and just inject too much fuel, blah blah blah, stall.

Why do people drive motor bikes with exhausts so loud they can be heard kilometers away? Why do people run screamer pipes? Why do people run straight pipe exhaust? Why do people run titanium exhausts?

One the street? Generally because they're stupid enough to think that it will make chicks pull the clothes off and give them a blowie on the spot, or they think the cops don't mind, or they think they're more important than everyone else and need everyone else to be able to hear that important fact.

The truth is, there's a limit to how much weight you need to save on a road car (or bike), there's a limit to how much power you can use in a street car (or bike), there's a limit to how much noise you can get away with before your neighbours dob you in to the cops for being a wanker, etc etc. As a result, there's really no need to have full race style mods on a street car. A piped back wastegate is sensible. A quiet enough exhaust is sensible and will still flow damn near as much as a stratight through. A titanium exhaust doesn't have to be noisy, but why would you need to spend so much on a street car?

Its their car. If you run a pod filter, most people are immediately going to say that you have a vented bov because the sound which comes through the BOV, so already you are a dickhead. And these days it doesn't take a BOV to make you a dickhead, people see you in a skyline and label you as a dickhead. Everyone here chose to drive a skyline. Thank your selves you don't live in america driving a jap car.

I'm not following this last bit. The factory BOV sound through a pod sounds nothing like a venting BOV. And what if I bought my Skyline before all the venting BOV wankers did? (which I did by the way, I have had it since last century). And what the hell would be the problem of having a Jap car in the US? Have you ever been there? Last time I was there, the few decent Jap cars I saw were like little breath of fresh air and they looked cool. Are you saying that US folks look down on Skyline drivers more than Aus drivers do? Why?

Having a blocked bov is just as bad - Nissan designed the car to have it there.

All the cars I mentioned nissan released from the factory with a MAF and no BOV. I realise that the new cars did hence I wanted to know how they tuned it out.

This thread isn't about should I get a bov or should I make my car flutter, it is how did nissan tune out the stalling issues, that is all.

I'm not following this last bit. The factory BOV sound through a pod sounds nothing like a venting BOV.

With a pod my stock BOV was ridiculously loud, I ended up making a small gasket for the BOV so that it couldn't vent as fast, it still stops reversion (doesn't flutter) but it is much quieter now.

I'm not following this last bit. The factory BOV sound through a pod sounds nothing like a venting BOV. And what if I bought my Skyline before all the venting BOV wankers did? (which I did by the way, I have had it since last century). And what the hell would be the problem of having a Jap car in the US? Have you ever been there? Last time I was there, the few decent Jap cars I saw were like little breath of fresh air and they looked cool. Are you saying that US folks look down on Skyline drivers more than Aus drivers do? Why?

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=1jOZjTTWtOI Fast forward to 2:50. This is my car, apexi pod and stock BOV with sleeved standard rubber pipe.

Have you seen any of the videos or read any forums of US cars. They absolutely hate japanese sports cars. No matter what the car is, its always a ricer to them as they love their muscle cars. Just watch videos of organised street racers of JDM cars vs muscle cars and the shit the drivers often cop. Ive seen a lot of videos over the past years. Its alot worse than driving here. I'm not saying their JDM cars are shit, but from what I recall, skylines are not allowed on the streets of america so they are often hated against. Reason they aren't allowed on the street is due to their performance and likeability which will throw people from paying america for more fat ugly american muscle cars. They don't look down on skyline drivers, there are no skyline drivers there. They look down on JDM drivers. Simple as that. ANY video you see of any JDM car, no matter how fast it is, how stock it is, how what ever it is, the comments from other americans will always read "piece of shit japanese ricer shit' and the alike. At least down here people admire our cars.

I remember the first time I went to a skyline meet. It was across the road from my place at the park. I'm not sure if it was SAU but there were obviously heaps of skylines there, a porsche and some other cars. Most had BOV's on them. More often than not when I hear a skyline or JDM car pass me, or go past my house, the bird whistle often follows. Its much more frequent with the evo drivers.

I'm considering upgrading to a MAP based ECU in the future purely to make these issues a thing of the past. Damn power FC should have some adapter things I can hook up to it.

Edited by SargeRX8

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...