Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah i know i know...i've searched and i've read all there is to read.

But theres too much of it and theres really no clear winner.

Still don't know wether to do it or not...?? Help

Thus i was wondering who has actually DONE IT....has it made a DIFFERENCE...and more IMPORTANTLY since some might have done it a while back have there been any negative affects you've noticed since doing it.

Ohh and has there been a universal agreement on whats the most efficient way of doing it? WHAT WORKS BEST.

I just got my straight through exhaust and i've heard its wise to do it after each mod...? What u guys think?

Thanks

-Dan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/37970-ecu-reset-final-verdict/
Share on other sites

It does take two seconds to do. If your car is not running rough then it won't do anything at all. It does nothing to any of the fuel or ignition maps, possibly helps calibrate closed loop operation but, that doen't affect the power of your car at all.

After evey mod? I didn't bother to do it when I had a gtst. It's not by definition 'wise' becasue it's ignorant of the fact of how the ecu actually does work. Go pick your nose instead, there are more gains to had there for roughly the same time spent.

nice reply rev!

charmer.

the biggest difference it will make is if your car's been pinging.....

the computer will retard to avoid detonation. resetting clears this but if the issue is something more than just a bit of a hot day you will find it pinging and be back to square one in minutes.....

I have a '95 GTS-t and when I changed from a HKS Pod -> K&N Paneil Filter (in the standard airbox) I had rough idling. This was fixed after resetting my ECU.

Same here, ditched the HKS pod and when to stock airbox = dodgy idle.

ECU reset = nice idle :D

J

The idle is part of closed loop operation.

As for pinging. If you find your car pinging it will change nothing doing an ecu reset, unless of course the pinging is during very light throttle cruising, because the ecu does not change the ignition map or the fuel map at all. The ecu will still retard the ignition based on the knock sensor feedback exactly the same way regardless.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...