Jump to content
SAU Community

Is A Cat Really Needed?

Ruxis

By Ruxis,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

BrynDETT Community Regular

BrynDETT

Posted
Posted

up here in qld they dont seem to care very much about cats..

twice i have been fined for being to low, and on the one occasion where i got on my knees to see what he was talking about the cop was poking my decat pipe with his little height wheel thing.. never said a word..

mine is a 3" stainless decat, doesnt even look like a cat haha

Hanaldo Grand Master

Hanaldo

Posted
Posted

I had a cat on my r33... but my PFCpro has launch controll.... bits of cat come out the exzaust lol decat without removing it

This is why it's important to get a cat with metal substrate.

Rolls Grand Master

Rolls

Posted
Posted

I have never in my entire life heard of someone other than a trucking company get one of those $10,000 fines, and that was only because they regularly hadn't met the service time frames for the cat/muffler/particulate filters.

I haven't even heard of a workshop getting fined, not even forum heresay let alone proof.

Hanaldo Grand Master

Hanaldo

Posted
Posted

I just don't see the point of running a decat. The difference between a decat and a good quality high-flow cat is negligible, you wouldn't even notice it. You can get a good metal high-flow for so cheap these days, it's bordering on irresponsible to run a decat simply for the sake of $50 or $60. Why even debate whether you should use one or not?

Hanaldo Grand Master

Hanaldo

Posted
Posted

The difference is more than $60, if you want one that's going to flow 250rwkw and higher. Also, flames are rad

I paid $160 delivered for my 5" body Venom cat (though after a quick search on eBay, I notice prices have gone up), am currently making 260rwkw with no restriction from the exhaust. Will soon be pushing 300rwkw+, will let you know how it goes then but I highly doubt it will be a problem. Considering I was quoted $100 to have a decat pipe made up (there was a stage when I thought my cat was a restriction where I considered going decat, but it turned out to not be the case), there isn't THAT much difference in price, and it's certainly not enough of a margin to tempt me to run a decat at all.

Flames are pretty rad though :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Watermouse
      HPA interview re suspension setup

      By Watermouse · Posted

      Great interview on damper settings and coil selection by HPA https://www.facebook.com/HPAcademy/videos/30284693841175196/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
    • GTSBoy
      Stagea 260RS seats

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah, it was a pretty deep dig.
    • dbm7
      Requirements for Xenon Headlights? (Possible Solution)

      By dbm7 · Posted

      The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • GTSBoy
      Requirements for Xenon Headlights? (Possible Solution)

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • rahilp
      Requirements for Xenon Headlights? (Possible Solution)

      By rahilp · Posted

      Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...