SAU 1/4 Mile Times (v2)

[wrxhoon]

great 60 ft on your last run bill !

i did a 1.8 60 ft on my last run but hit the rev limiter in first and lost traction when i put it in second so i only did 12.3 on that run .

i'll have to go back and have another go at an 11 sec pass .

[butthead]

Thanks mate, bit disappointed with 110 MPH, might need to make an appointment with Ben for a tune lol. You will get a mid 11 with a near perfect run.

[MrBlonde]

Sorry only Skylines.

Denied! Nobody loves me :-(

In that case could whoever was kind enough to enter my old ET into your timeslip database either update it or delete it?

[GTR032]

'JETT' ran a 10.8 tonight at WSID, 21/7/2004..

I did a fairly dissapointing 13.3@103mph.

[2rismo]

'JETT' ran a 10.8 tonight at WSID, 21/7/2004..

HOLY SHIT DUDE!!!

Nice work!

Adrian

[BU5TER]

rofl unless I'm mistaken looks like the naaaaws worked hahaha, I wonder if he ran it on the 20's

[Fast31]

nah looked like he was running nittos on 17's or something like that.

Bloody huge bottle of giggle gas in the boot too

[BU5TER]

ooops I forgot to say cograts awesome time mate you must be over the moon

[whatsisname]

10.8 - awesome!

[benm]

I think it has a 10.6sec on the current setup too with more experience. He did an 11.4sec whilst bogging the launch, then on the next run the launch was better and the result was a 10.8sec :P

Yum

[2rismo]

I think it has a 10.6sec on the current setup too with more experience.

And I think that with a 60' time of 1.59 and a lowly terminal speed of 127, he's driving the car to it's full potential and you're kidding yourself.

Adrian

[benm]

And I think that with a 60' time of 1.59 and a lowly terminal speed of 127, he's driving the car to it's full potential and you're kidding yourself.

Adrian

and I think if you actually watched the 11.4sec and 10.8sec runs tonight (to see the difference in launches) you would agree that a 10.6x is on the cards as the 10.8sec launch was 'better' but with more practice could yield more tenths.

[wreckedhead]

hey guys, when you see the video tape i heard i mgiht be getting really soon, youll hear the gear miss in 3rd, thats why the mph were down, but hopefully will get it right for next time.

[MrBlonde]

JETT told me he didn't use the nitrous. He was running 18" rims I think with circuit slicks on the rear. But he did have a tankful of C16 and no cats!

[wreckedhead]

yeah c16 is normal when using gas i think, anything less and youll blow something, but 11.1 without gas isnt to bad of a time, and would be beter if had some decent soft slicks on the back

[wrxhoon]

wsid 21/7/04

11.705 @120.85 mph

1.846 60 ft

[MrBlonde]

wsid   21/7/04

11.705 @120.85 mph

1.846 60 ft

The old man's clutch will never be the same! ;-)

[MrBlonde]

yeah c16 is normal when using gas i think, anything less and youll blow something, but 11.1 without gas isnt to bad of a time, and would be beter if had some decent soft slicks on the back

11.1 is awesome and some nice fat sidewalled drag slicks will only help matters!

[2rismo]

and I think if you actually watched the 11.4sec and 10.8sec runs tonight (to see the difference in launches) you would agree that a 10.6x is on the cards as the 10.8sec launch was 'better' but with more practice could yield more tenths.

1.59 second 60'. Need I say more.

Adrian

[2rismo]

News Flash lol....it wasn't wreckedhead driving it at all.... bummer....

Awesome car, awesome time, can't go in this list though.

Adrian