Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have been in the process of upgrading the whole exhaust

removed the turbos and all the gear to replace the dump pipes,

Reassembled everything, then disconnected the battery to tack a few parts of the exhaust underneath the car with a TIG.

Now its all going, only thing changed is the exhaust(all of it), but the engine is running richer than ever before, like 13.0:1 @2000rpm in the shed, and as you back off to get closer to idle, it goes off the scales rich and obviously dies.>_<

Looked at AFM voltages, they are;

ENGINE NOT RUNNING

AFM-1 --- 0.44

AFM-2 --- 0.50

ENGINE @ 1500rpm

AFM-1 --- 1.60

AFM-2 --- 0.75

I removed the afm's cleaned them out and removed the cover from the top, checked the solder joins, they look good, they were new AFM's not long ago..

reassembled and checked again,

same results,

removed AFM's and swapped top one for bottom,

same results, and the voltages stay as is/similar.

I'll take a video and see if that helps too

any help appreciated

Edited by blue_vl_t
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/383599-strange-mapping-problem/
Share on other sites

Intake leak will cause the car to run rich as hell, you have measured air coming in and being given fuel for but lost before it gets to the engine. I forgot one tiny vacuum hose, it was enough to make my car idle with black smoke coming from the back. Check every single silicone connector, hose, seal, everything which helps the air stay in the intake.

Edited by SargeRX8

well i had looked a few times,

but i shoved some air in the intake this time and blocked the other, and what do you know, one air leak, i'll fix that, hopefully its all the problem is.

not sure why i always think a problem is something more complicated......

fixed the intake leak, but its running just as bad, like so bad i cant keep it running unless using 1500+rpm, took it for a drive around the block, stalled like 4 times, af mixtures are just going crazy, all over the place.

it will most likely be something simple, a matter of finding it....

ecu is PFC pro, z32 afm's

o2 sensors are removed and bunged up, also turned off on the PFC.

The wiring to the rear AFM is only just long enough to reach, so wouldn't reach the front one.

Im just making up some caps for where the afm connect to the pipework, see if there is anymore leaks, pressurize the system

Just pressurized the system with 5-10psi, looped the rocker cover breathers together, so it pressurized the whole motor, sump and all, its dead silent, no leaks, until the dipstick pops out, lol

so intake leaks, none.

I'll have to see about metering out the afm cables to the ECU, see what i come up with.

I recently had a similar problem with a Z32 that was meant to work..

I have a strange suspicion the body earth for that one is sensitive and may give a crazy effect... Mine was idling at 3.7v, yet i suspect the AFM will work fine when put into a known working case (will test tomorrow).

when using map tracer, in the shed, free revving the engine, if you hold the rpm at 2000rpm and gradually lift the throttle from the floor, the below lovely ms paint diagram shows approximately the path of the map tracer, ie which cells are being used.

IGNMapdatalogitbasemap.jpg

Edited by blue_vl_t

blow off valves hooked up and working?

though you did pressurize the intake...

well, i haven't touched them, the car was running fine about a week ago, just removed exhaust side and reassemble with new exhaust.

as you said, pressurized intake, nothing was leaking......

Stock gtr BOV's

Edited by blue_vl_t

a prize.......

i'll take you for a spin, you live close by to Kalgoorlie, lol

I actually could not find anything wrong with the wiring, and i'm an electrician.

but the plugs on the r32/r33 model is quite crap in design, you have to push the plug in further the the bolt will pull it in.

but i recon it is was just a matter of unplug the ecu and plug it in, kinda thing. lol

I do think i will have to install another muffler, the 4" is kinda loud, i am only able to find the Magnaflow ones off the shelf, anyone know if they will do much, or someone to build one custom etc??

it should do, but my crappy superwizz turboteh bleed valve has a stripped thread, loose connection, which is probably why it was running more boost than i thought it was, i removed it, and its now running a massive 12psi, woo hoo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...