Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have 12 degress on intake and 10 on exh, and with stock cams and stock turbos the R32 makes 292rwkw @ 19 psi, the 34 has 10 degress intake and 4 exh with poncams and -7s made 310rwkw, so 8 in and 4 exh i doubt thats going to cause the problem.

I'd be looking at the intake pipes for a leak or crack, check all hose clamps are on right and tight, check the BOVs bolts are done up tight, even go around the plenum with a can of brake clean with engine running and see if idle changes at all to see if a gasket has given way or a small hose hasn't come off.

6/7 kw is a sizable loss but not what your looking at as the problem but something I'd be looking at improving

Take out air filter and stick a screw driver handle in the airbox to hold it open and see if that helps

them mayby look at different dump pipes as x-force are an upgrade to only the stock 32/33 stuff but only just and are not the best, I picked up 20kw (290 awkw to 310rwkw) from changing from HKS dump pipe to the CES Comp Series dumps and front pipes, I hate knocking stuff so this is really only a suggestion

Thanks for the post. I didn't know you could run that much boost with stock R32 turbos. I'd say DVS JEZ will go through those things providing the compression test comes back ok to start with. Also... could leaking piping be the issue if its still making 17 p.s.i which I'm guessing is read at the inlet manifold? Which is after all the piping, cooler etc?

And as far as I know the xforce dump pipes are an exact copy of the hks ones (split type) that surely should be sufficient enough for 300+kw?

from what ive read and from before/after dyno graphs i dont think that the dumps would be the issue

they would be 100% fine for 300kw and lots more

XKLABA i dare say that ur 20kw gain would have mostly been from ur front pipe change, there are large gains had from changing to bigger diameter front pipes

you can run that boost for short spurts, dyno and drags but not burnouts or track events and have done so for 8 years now with two sets of turbos, first set had to be changed cause the bearing where gone with 4mm + shaft play and no damage to either wheels.

yeah comp test is a good start but if it isn't given a slight wiff of blue smoke from exhaust then i'd say comp would be good, a small but consistent leak would be over come with the boost controller making the boost level, also check there isn.t a leak around the exhaust manifold before the turbos, even a small leak will rob power.

Joe, the design of the dump pipe can make a big difference ( bigger then front pipes ) in both responce and power and if you get to see the CES comp series pipes in real life you can see way they work so well, I've tried a few styles on both the 32 and 34 and i have CES on both now, the normal ones on the 32 with equal lenght front pipe and the longer comp ones on the 34

I remember reading a thread in this forum where some had a mildly modded gtr (around 300rwkw)

they performed a before and after test using stock dumps and then some after market larger dumps

the difference ended up being 3 fifths of f#ck all

not sayin ur wrong but at these sorta power figures i dont think the dumps make that much difference,

not doubting that CES arent a better dump either, i just dont think the dumps are his power problem

ill see if i can find the thread

As data point, I'm running xforce split dumps with -7s on 17psi and making 305kw. Factory air box. Another reason not to focus on the dumps at this stage is that changing them is a big job, so you only want to consider it if you have very strong indications that they are the problem. So, IMO, forget the dumps for the moment.

What are your front pipe dimensions? FWIW the primaries on mine are 56mm ID and the secondary is 76mm.

Other than front pipe, I'd be looking at your inlet side for leaks or restrictions.

What spark plugs are you running and what gap? I had an issue with mine when I first got it Dyno tuned, ended up having something like 0.6mm spark gap

Had spark blow out and wen we turned the boost up more it didn't gain any extra power

To be safe I changed my coilpacks and coilpack wiring loom too

MrStabby - front pipe is exactly the same dimensions as yours.

SiR RB - I'm not sure what the gap is as I left that all to the tuner but I know the plugs are just the ngk cheaper ones

I have faith in DVS JEZ to get to the bottom of this Jon

Checked the front of the exhaust cam for wear? how is the ignition timing be set? don't use the loop at the back of the motor, get a plug lead and shove it up coil #1, then run the light off that, with the TPS unplugged.

Edited by iplen

Checked the front of the exhaust cam for wear? how is the ignition timing be set? don't use the loop at the back of the motor, get a plug lead and shove it up coil #1, then run the light off that, with the TPS unplugged.

This means get a timing light, remove No 1 coil get a old school lead for twim cam cut it in half stick one end on the spark plug and the other end in the coil and read the timing light off the lead, we on the other hand just open the timing light reader and hold it against the front of the coil with it still in place, to check if you base timing is correct.

+ 1 on comp results

as for the dump pipes, it was a suggestion for something to check as a possibility, coming from things i have exprienced in the near 10 years i have been playing with these cars and was something I reseached heaps in the path of getting the 32 as fast as it is.

The front pipes on 34 where the HKS ones with a 76mm in and 80mm out equal length, I don't think there was 20kw from changing them.

Just trying to help

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...