Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently replaced my standard turbo with a hybrid (high flowed) unit.

With same settings I made this overlay from the dyno-plot to show the differences in spoolup.

I thought why not post it ..

Green=Hybrid

Red=Genuine Nissan

Essentially the Nissan turbo is @1BAR @2900RPM whereas the Hybrid needs 3700RPM for that.

I have no idea whether this is good or bad performance for a hybrid and will do some research.

The car feels not as laggy as the plot might suggest, so I'm quite happy with the result.

Cheers :)

post-33912-0-42142200-1323029123_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/384871-standard-vs-hybrid-boost-graph/
Share on other sites

Well for once the standard turbo fell apart, and yes ... certainly, for more reliable boost/power.

The ECU was mapped to accommodate the higher boost anyhow.

What is the reason for the turbo swap? Will u up the boost and get it tuned to gain more power?

Well,

This graph/post was not about power, but spool-up on same conditions.

(though power increased by 20HP with almost identical boost)

And 'yes' the turbo is a standard high flowed unit with bush bearings.

(good for 20PSI)

It looks a bit like a standard bush bearing rebuild.

Edited by Torques

If it was a bush bearing hi-flow, it couldn't have been expensive.

You can rebuild the cores for $400-$500!

Wouldn't have paid anymore than $1000-$1100 for a bushie hi-flow. They ain't worth anything more regardless of what retailers try and charge

It's hard to say whether that kind of performance is good or bad 'cause you've given us very little info about the highflow unit to base our judgement on.

But standard turbo was designed around minimal lag concept - nylon compressor, ceramic turbo - so it's nearly impossible to even come close to it in terms of lag (or lack thereof). Nissan has done their homework with turbo matching, so the only question is how much more power you'll be able to squeeze out of the new turbo and if the new power level justifies newly introduced lag.

No, it was not as expensive as a BB HKS or Trust or ..

It was around $1100 and is a good quality unit 'made in UK :)' by a company

that deals with commercial turbos on a industrial scale.

I doubt your $400, since you also have to machine the housings etc.

But anyhow, this was not so much the point of the my post and I am quite happy with the unit. :)

If it was a bush bearing hi-flow, it couldn't have been expensive.

You can rebuild the cores for $400-$500!

Wouldn't have paid anymore than $1000-$1100 for a bushie hi-flow. They ain't worth anything more regardless of what retailers try and charge

Amen to that!

Well, all the information I have that it is good for 20PSI and that

it is machined out quite a bit.

Stao (Hypergear) did like units in the past.

As usual with these units there is no compressor map available.

I will know about the turbo's capacity once I raised the boost.

As for spool-up I compared my plot to other turbos and my spool-up looks

OK in comparison.

Yes, I could have bought a nice HKS for 60% more $$$ but I wanted a drop im replacement for the time being ..

But again:

I just wanted to make this data available since I thought people might find it interesting .. :)

It's hard to say whether that kind of performance is good or bad 'cause you've given us very little info about the highflow unit to base our judgement on.

But standard turbo was designed around minimal lag concept - nylon compressor, ceramic turbo - so it's nearly impossible to even come close to it in terms of lag (or lack thereof). Nissan has done their homework with turbo matching, so the only question is how much more power you'll be able to squeeze out of the new turbo and if the new power level justifies newly introduced lag.

Unfortunately max pressure of 20 psi is not enough. Knowing/finding out compressor origin, blade count and inducer/exducer measurements would be a good starting point to give a basic idea about its flow capabilities and max hp, the same can be said for turbine stage.

No one is talking you into spending big ₤₤ on turbo, but people have seen 1 bar @ 3700rpm with GT3076R (e.g. Lithium, The Mafia), which is also capable of 20 psi, :) but as a bouns it will produce significantly more HP.

On the other hand - if you're happy with your purchase and enjoying the car then none of the above really matters, does it? ;)

Hmmm

I have this data somewhere, will be happy to post it.

The CHRA is Garrett.

Sure, boost is not everything, (in the end it is about flow anyhow)

But what you are getting at is compressor efficiency.

With these hybrids you have to trust the manufacturer quite a bit.

They said the turbo is good for about 350-380HP.

Also I have to say that I still have the standard exhaust / airbox on it.

(and only the R34 SMIC)

So all things considered I'm good and happy with what I have ATM.

(More to come)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...