Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What would you suggest as a muffler got a stock on the moment, I use to use this but the loud droning was abit of a carry on ;p http://media.photobucket.com/image/magnaflow%203.5/bigdizzle09/DSC02767.jpg

i had a nismo 3inch in 4 inch out oval on mine for a while, my current one is a custom stainless one ill have a look for the company name i have it on a business card somewhere

I've seen one set up on an tough as nails.ls1 before, on the v8 it sound good both open and closed. on sides they seem to be either too raspy open or to muffeled and choppy closed.

Alot of new cars have them butterfly valves standard but they're not legal as an aftermarket item (i can only speak about in nsw as im unaware of other states rules)

when i got my exhaust done, i wanted to go 3" with the valve for 2 -3psi of back pressure like the r8's have, Liverpool exhaust said they can fit it but have to warn me it isn't legal, i then asked about the varex mufflers, same. I decided to stick with the 2.5"

but to roughly sum it up, in nsw if it can be adjusted its illegal but with exceptions

custom made stainless by some ipswitch mob, 2.5 inch in with twin 2.5 inch outless and twin three inch tips.well that's mine lol. other then that anything "straight through" that's not a cannon on a natro is fine :)

probley should re word that, cause according to that a coke can could be used lol.

as I've said before i had a nismo oval on mine for a while and it was good. other than that i haven't really heard many na's where i know the muffler brand.

If you could find the guy that owns "ftw 33" he may be of more use.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...