Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

An airflow meter adjust fuel requirements for differences in IAT.

Pretty sure the GTR ecu has IAT correction.

An airflow meter doesn't need intake temperature correction because the way it operates it measures exactly the right amount of air, doesn't matter what humidity, altitude, temperature or anything the method measures exactly the right amount of air. It is only MAP that needs IAT correction.

However I am talking temperature ignition/fuel trim, apparently the GTR is the only car that has the IAT sensor, what it does with the signal I am unaware of, Pete at nistune said they could almost certainly set it up to trim fuel/ignition but currently they haven't looked into it.

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It's Inlet Air Temperature.

When you have a MAP sensor, you must measure temperature also, so that you can work out the mass of air entering the engine. Because you have to have the temp sensor, it makes it a no-brainer to make the ignition timing vary with air temp. Less benefit trimming the mixture, but also possible.

When I said earlier that the only Nissan ECU with IAT sensor is the RB26, I was talking about the RB engines only, because I'm pretty sure that SRs have it as well. Nissan absolutely must be using it to trim ignition timing, because there's little other reason to have it there.

FWIW, RB engines absolutely suck in this regard. My car actually seems faster in summer because it's closer to the detonation threshold, whereas in winter it could probably take another bajillion degrees of timing on those midnight hills runs.

hey GTS thats weird that you say that because i have seen NUMEROUS cars make more power in the cold then the heat, even the hi octane r32 when it went to japan it ran 150hp MORE in the cold air then our air here. And another thing japans "general" humidity is also higher, so in turn that would leave me to believe that it would also have an inherit benefit having more moisture in the air that the sensor would pick up on and compensate for?????

hey GTS thats weird that you say that because i have seen NUMEROUS cars make more power in the cold then the heat, even the hi octane r32 when it went to japan it ran 150hp MORE in the cold air then our air here. And another thing japans "general" humidity is also higher, so in turn that would leave me to believe that it would also have an inherit benefit having more moisture in the air that the sensor would pick up on and compensate for?????

Yeah, well, the chance that the Hi Octane R32 was running factory management is pretty small, no? And isn't it an RB26.....which has an IAT anyway if it just happned to be using factory type management?

And no.....the whole thing about Japan's climate being different to Australia's and the whole effect that has on tuning is somewhat of a myth. In Australia we have a wide range of climates. From hot dry summer weather at 40+C, down to cold damp weather near freezing. And we have hot wet tropics too. The air in Japan is the same air we get here. 79.1% N2, 20.9% O2 as a simplification. The trace gases are the same, and the moisture levels might be a bit higher, but air can only hold a percent or so of water vapour, so we're not talking 5% or 10% differences in the "quality" of the air here, we're talking fractions of a percent.

The main difference is that winter in Japan can be a lot colder, and where the winters are really cold, the summers are not quite as hot as here. But that's regional in Japan, same as it is regional here.

Jap ECUs (like the infamous Mines ECUs) are just tuned with 100 octane juice in mind, coupled with a different approach to maintaining safe mixtures and timing. They lean on the margins fairly hard. That means that there's no margin left when the same ECU is used in Australia.

I also have seen numerous cars make a lot more power in the cold. Mine probably makes a little more too, because of the denser air, you get a little more charge into the engine. But the Nissan ECU can't take advantage of the cold air to wind in more timing, and so gives away a heap of power in the cold (if it is tuned not to ping in the heat). Simple bloody ECUs like Microtechs make more power in the cold on the same tune that won't ping in the heat. Just because they have an IAT and can use it.

Edited by GTSBoy

You guys are forgetting the FMIC, the effect this has on air temperature on cool weather vs hot weather is massive. The larger the temperature differential the better it cools the air, this is almost solely the reason cars make more power in winter.

All of my completely stock skylines have been MASSIVELY faster in winter vs summer, I'm talking almost 100kw differences with a shitty pod and FMIC that gets heatsoak driving in traffic in a 35c day vs a 10c winter night in the hills.

Generally on a knock limited turbocharged engine using speed density style tuning you would actually reduce your ignition timing for lower intake air temps as your cylinder fill increases. This is due the fact that most ecu's dont have a load based ignition curve but rather just a manifold pressure based ignition curve. This is not the case on a maf based systems or some oem speed density ecu's.

Edited by rob82

Yeah, well, the chance that the Hi Octane R32 was running factory management is pretty small, no? And isn't it an RB26.....which has an IAT anyway if it just happned to be using factory type management?

And no.....the whole thing about Japan's climate being different to Australia's and the whole effect that has on tuning is somewhat of a myth. In Australia we have a wide range of climates. From hot dry summer weather at 40+C, down to cold damp weather near freezing. And we have hot wet tropics too. The air in Japan is the same air we get here. 79.1% N2, 20.9% O2 as a simplification. The trace gases are the same, and the moisture levels might be a bit higher, but air can only hold a percent or so of water vapour, so we're not talking 5% or 10% differences in the "quality" of the air here, we're talking fractions of a percent.

The main difference is that winter in Japan can be a lot colder, and where the winters are really cold, the summers are not quite as hot as here. But that's regional in Japan, same as it is regional here.

Jap ECUs (like the infamous Mines ECUs) are just tuned with 100 octane juice in mind, coupled with a different approach to maintaining safe mixtures and timing. They lean on the margins fairly hard. That means that there's no margin left when the same ECU is used in Australia.

I also have seen numerous cars make a lot more power in the cold. Mine probably makes a little more too, because of the denser air, you get a little more charge into the engine. But the Nissan ECU can't take advantage of the cold air to wind in more timing, and so gives away a heap of power in the cold (if it is tuned not to ping in the heat). Simple bloody ECUs like Microtechs make more power in the cold on the same tune that won't ping in the heat. Just because they have an IAT and can use it.

umm ok i know about weather as i was born in townsville and lived in mount isa for a few yrs and in melbourne. but the rest of what you just said i was like {:| huh

  • 5 months later...

wow its quite interesting ready some of the old comments that you make at times and realising what a f u c k head that you can be to people. Really sorry everyone for being such a fu ck stain. wow cant believe that was me, so immature.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...