Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what have you fellow r33/r34 GTST/GTT owners out there installed to adjust or fix camber on the front of your cars?

i've read that the adjustible arms (from just jap) can be a pain to adjust whilst on car. can anyone confirm this?

the superpro kit will require the stock arms to be removed, old bushes removed and new joints pressed in = more time the car is off the road.

pros & cons of each kit and any personal experience with either in regards to installion, adjustment, etc.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/388112-r33r34-front-camber/
Share on other sites

What you're saying is pretty accurate - The design is such that they are hard to adjust on car with the JJR arms and the superpro bushes will require you to press out/in as required.

If you want adjustable camber, you'll need to make a choice: re the above lol.

I've got the JJ ones.

Cost me $55 at JAX in Liverpool each time I do my wheel alignment before track days I get 3.5 front and 2.5 rear, then returned to street setting after.

They need to remove my front wheels and get it up on a hoist to adjust the front, all up takes them about 45 minutes max, nothing about bushes, a couple of big spanners is all that is needed.

I'm wanting adjustable castor arms ? now.

The bushes will be cheaper so if you are only chasing a degree or so adjustment for a street car they would be fine.

Myself, I'd get the arms for maximum adjustability.

ive been wondering this for a little while, was leaning more towards the adjustable arms but my question is whether there is much of a difference or benefit between the rubber bushes on the arms or pillowballs?? any help appreciated :)

Ive had my wheel aligments done about 15 to 20 times there over the last 3-4 yrs, LOL.

Ive had no problems with them, just be sure to tell them what you want it for, a couple of guys there do drifting and some trackdays, the boss owns a Rambler Gremlin drag car.

Go have a chat to them.

thanks for the info guys,

definitely made up my mind and getting the adjustible arms now.

Mark/MLR, do they do good work @ jax??

I put the Superpro ones in man, my mate showed me the tricks to fitting them and the second side i did in the car without any drama.... Hammer to knock the old bush out, a couple of accurate love taps and they fall out and then when fitting the new ones in i just used a monster set of multi grips and squeezed them in, was pretty easy to fit.... As for adjustment, i reckon its going to be harder but it all depends on the competence of the tyre guys you use i guess......

OR i could just leave them adjusted where they are at MAX neg camber :nyaanyaa:

i believe they only provide -/+ 0.05 degrees camber which is sfa lol

might as well pay bit more and get heaps more adjustment in the adjustible arms.

You;re doing something wrong if you're only getting that much adjustment! :laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...