Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wow, wait till aftermarket ECU tuners get their hands on that and can play with variable compression from 7.0:1 to 18.0:1. On top of varying fuel and boost already.

I wonder why they're using the whole separate rod and piston driven off the crank to control the compression instead of an electric device with a rod and piston driven off that. Maybe it makes too much mess around/external to the head

They indicated it was a 100% mechanical setup so thats probably why. I wonder what they use to move the actuator that adjusts compression. That is one awesome technology. Now if they can make it strong enough to handle some real power!

didnt play the you tube vid as this computer seems to get viruses from you tube all the time ,VCR is old technology . . was reading about an old test engine used in TAFE,. . . .they could raise the compression of the engine by lifting the head closer/further away from the pistons, not sure how they did it but it was within the grasp of first year students

this is true ^^, if this engine design makes it into regular production cars it will be interesting to see how durable it is compared to the current crop of engines, good to see some new devolopement coming out as there doesnt seem to be a lot going on with manufacturers (apart from hybrid tech) lately

that is neat. the end of it though makes things more interesting as they mention VVT and forced induction. overall someone had a bright idea to make an engine more efficient. that certainly does that. also like the comparison vs hybrid.

Not really a new concept, Saab did this in 2000 and unveiled a motor that had a tilting head which varies the CR. Haven't heard anything since then.

The geared conrod method is different, Saab probably patented the tilting head.

Wonder how the intrinsic strength of both solutions stacks up...

Not really a new concept, Saab did this in 2000 and unveiled a motor that had a tilting head which varies the CR. Haven't heard anything since then.

The geared conrod method is different, Saab probably patented the tilting head.

Wonder how the intrinsic strength of both solutions stacks up...

it would be good if it was out soon on cars, you would be able to have the ecu read the octane of the fuel in the tank and adjust the CR too suit , , ,run anything from cats piss ULP to E85 (and anything in between)without having to lift a finger

  • 3 weeks later...

Nissan's version is better if you look at that tiny gear wheel below the piston that has to take alot of force you can tell that's a potential weak point. Plus nissan's version suits a reciprocating motion better.

http://www.nissan-global.com/EN/TECHNOLOGY/OVERVIEW/vcr.html

Yeah it's old technology - another way to do it is to set up the head with high comp ratio and use psid controlled valves to dump pre combustion fuel/air mixture into exhaust. It's wasteful and not good for the environment, plus adds too much plumbing around the engine.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
×
×
  • Create New...