Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This seems near impossible, But just wondering if it can be done from up top or underneath with a mirror or torch. Im trying to figure out if I have Garrett 2650 -5's or the standard R32 GTR's. As I been told from someone they are rebuilt R32's and from another that they are 2560 -5' that had the seals redone.

Ive tried from up top. Can only see the oil sender thing, and 1-1 or something marked on it. Should I just give up lol.

Well after an Hour and a half, with 2 jack stands, 2 LED lights and a adjustable mirror, I managed to find..... hahah and read the tag on the turbo. You need to put the mirror inbetween the 2 front pipes, up on the cast side, then search around with the LED's and you will find it.. eventualy.

It Says 14411-06U00. I did a search on this, and apparently its a Nismo one?? so Not the standard R32 GTR turbos :) The previous owner had them rebuilt too. Can anyone shed any light or info on the 14411-06U00's?

To all those that say you can't without removing parts/pipes or taking engine out. you can :) its called determination lol.

Edited by 91BNR32

What is confusing though, is that is the tag I read off the rear Turbo, 14411-06U00 nismo which is fine, "Garrett A/R 42 M24"

Every pic I find for the nismo says "Garrett A/R *****60***** M24" i.e it says 60 not 42.

Edited by 91BNR32

They both suck equally.

Buy something modern and tune it up.

+1

One set are small and laggy, without a decent top end power punch.

Another set are even laggier, but will make a semi-ok top end.

Basically 1980s designs. There are much newer/decent options available.

Ah that sucks :( Whats a good pair of turbo's for the street that will flow 300rwkw under $2000?

These R32 Nismo ones would only have 1000km on them, they were fully stripped and rebuild before I bought the car. I was thinking Id get the car tuned and if I get around the mark, I might just be happy with that. I don't see the point in speding all that money for another 20-30kw & 200-300rpm less laggier, When I'm just after a 300rwkw street only car. Can anyone understand where I'm coming from lol?

Edited by 91BNR32

Ah that sucks :( Whats a good pair of turbo's for the street that will flow 300rwkw under $2000?

These R32 Nismo ones would only have 1000km on them, they were fully stripped and rebuild before I bought the car. I was thinking Id get the car tuned and if I get around the mark, I might just be happy with that. I don't see the point in speding all that money for another 20-30kw & 200-300rpm less laggier, When I'm just after a 300rwkw street only car. Can anyone understand where I'm coming from lol?

There isn't anything under $2,000.

Plus you are not talking 200-300rpm. It'll be more than that. Upwards of 500rpm.

Anyway the rest of the info, funnily enough, if contained in a thread:

www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/236467-definitive-guide-to-building-300-330awkw-gt-r/

Have a long read of it. Has ALL the info you need.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...