Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so I have just installed R34 gtt front brakes on my 32gts-t. Now the bias is more to the rear / rears lock up before the fronts. Do I to now have to put a R34 master cylinder on?? When I installed the brakes I only bled the front brakes, would it make a difference bleeding the rears as well?? Also now the brake warning light is staying on.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/389292-r34-brakes-on-32/
Share on other sites

You should bleed the brakes in the proper order (furthest away from the master cylinder to closest) so RR RL FL FR. Whether you upgrade the master cylinder or not is a personal choice, how does the pedal feel? Are you still getting good braking response?

You've got something wrong, but not with the sizing of the hardware. The R34 calipers are essentially the same as R33 and R32 calipers, so should work just fine with the R32 master. If the rears are working better than the fronts, then it is unlikely that you need to bleed them to fix the problem. (Having said that, yes, you should have bled the rears when you installed the fronts.) I would go back and bleed the front again. Use a power bleeder if you can, and be careful if you are pumping the pedal not to push it all the way to the floor, as you may damage the seal on the master by pushing it past where it normally runs in the cylinder and into the rough, crappy surface at the end of the stroke - which will cause you to need a new master as well. As a guide, when I put R33 brakes on the front of my R32, it clearly moved the brake bias forwards.

Thanks for the replys. The brake pedal still feels very responsive and the fronts brakes work very well. At the point just before the fronts will lock the rears will first. I'll bleed all 4 and see if it fixes my problems. Thanks for the correct order to do this in. ill keep in mind not to push the pedal to far. I just hope the damage has not all ready been done to the master.

I've had the same problem after I upgraded to R34 GTT front calipers on my 32.

Only found rear wheel lockup happened on the track though under very heavy braking, haven't experienced it on the street, thought it may be just because of the different pads front to rear or weight transfer/car diving under braking.

I have brand new QFM A1RM's on the back and some mystery pads on the front that came with the R34 calipers. I have ABS fitted to my gtst which is currently disconnected but was hoping to reconnect before my next trackday so I wouldn't get rear brake lockup under heavy braking. Also planned to change the front pads to something more aggressive and the rears to something more standard.

Another thing that I have noticed is ever since the upgrade the rear wheels get covered in dust about 5 times quicker than the fronts but I just assumed it was the pads.

Love to hear if you figure out any easy fixes for your problem.

Thanks for the replys. The brake pedal still feels very responsive and the fronts brakes work very well. At the point just before the fronts will lock the rears will first. I'll bleed all 4 and see if it fixes my problems. Thanks for the correct order to do this in. ill keep in mind not to push the pedal to far. I just hope the damage has not all ready been done to the master.

I've had the same problem after I upgraded to R34 GTT front calipers on my 32.

Only found rear wheel lockup happened on the track though under very heavy braking, haven't experienced it on the street, thought it may be just because of the different pads front to rear or weight transfer/car diving under braking.

I have brand new QFM A1RM's on the back and some mystery pads on the front that came with the R34 calipers. I have ABS fitted to my gtst which is currently disconnected but was hoping to reconnect before my next trackday so I wouldn't get rear brake lockup under heavy braking. Also planned to change the front pads to something more aggressive and the rears to something more standard.

Another thing that I have noticed is ever since the upgrade the rear wheels get covered in dust about 5 times quicker than the fronts but I just assumed it was the pads.

Love to hear if you figure out any easy fixes for your problem.

That makes total sense. I should have assumed the OP didn't necessarily have well matched pads front to rear after the swap. I never used to have brake bias problems when I first got the car. But after putting the same pads in front and rear (Bendix Ultimates) it started wanting to lock the rears if you stamped the brakes, or at least lock the inside rear if you were braking quite hard on turn in. I couldn't understand that, until it was pointed out to me that it was more than likely that the OEM pads have different compounds front to rear - tweaked that way by Nissan to ensure the bias is good. Replace these with the same compound front and rear and you change that balance.

So, in your case THENIG, perhaps just try A1RMs on the front without going to a lesser pad on the front. Seeing as you only get bias issues on the track, you probably only need a small change to the balance.

Interesting,

I've also run r34gtt brakes on a 32 with factory master with no issue. I always ran a better front pad as its the one doing the bulk of the work, rears got whatever was on the shelf when i needed new ones.... non abs, no rear lock up issues unless i cocked up a 3-2 shift approaching a tight corner and even then it would only chirp the rears. Mostly track work with semi slicks.

No his rears are locking up first, check his first line in his post, larger front rotors will induce more front braking due to the leverage effect of a larger front rotor.

A silly way would be to fit smaller rear rotors. :)

<br />No his rears are locking up first, check his first line in his post, larger front rotors will induce more front braking due to the leverage effect of a larger front rotor.<br /><br />A silly way would be to fit smaller rear rotors. <img src='http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':)' /><br />
<br /><br /><br />

Um...no. He said he HAS fitted R34 front brakes. You can't fit the calipers without fitting the rotors (well, you could, but you'd be an idiot). And yet the car now has excessive rear brake bias. Despite having the bigger brakes at the front. That's why it doesn't make sense. It shouldn't be that way.....but it is.

Maybe it has something to do with increased weight transfer?

By increasing front rotor size you're making fronts do more job than before, so weight transfer under brakes is now increased compared to 280mm factory brakes, front axle receives more weight now, leaving less load for the rears, so the same rear brake torque with now reduced load (i.e. grip) tends to lock up earlier than before.

How good is your suspension, shocks in particular?

Or, as per above poster's experience, you have higher COF pads on the rear axle? Or crappier rear tyres that wouldn't grip? Or wheel alignment, namely excessive rear camber? There are many reasons why you could've gotten undesirable effect after brake upgrade that have nothing to do with brakes themselves.

Edited by Legionnaire

Maybe it has something to do with increased weight transfer?

By increasing front rotor size you're making fronts do more job than before, so weight transfer under brakes is now increased compared to 280mm factory brakes, front axle receives more weight now, leaving less load for the rears, so the same rear brake torque with now reduced load (i.e. grip) tends to lock up earlier than before.

How good is your suspension, shocks in particular?

Or, as per above poster's experience, you have higher COF pads on the rear axle? Or crappier rear tyres that wouldn't grip? Or wheel alignment, namely excessive rear camber? There are many reasons why you could've gotten undesirable effect after brake upgrade that have nothing to do with brakes themselves.

I wont rule out weight transfer until car sees the track again with new suspension to reduce dive under braking coming soon.

As for tyres or alignment, tyres were very sticky semi comp Direzza's and rear camber is stock, car has stock-ish rear ride height with plenty of contact patch on the rear tyres.

Im predicting in my case its purely brake pad selection. I'm curious now to see now if I can get the rears to lock up under heavy braking on the road when the pads are cold. Will have to give it a try soon.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...