Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Stock RB25DET (head bolts, head gasket, internals)

hks 256/264 cams and ex cam gear

nismo 740cc injectors

apexi pfc with a z32

garrett gt3076 .82 turbo with tial 44mm gate

GTR intercooler

Greddy plenum

Tomei 500hp lift pump with a 044 feed

Nismo fuel reg

23psi and BP Ultimate

BIG thanks to Trent and Cat from Chequered Tuning. Glad to see there are still legit people in the Auto industry.

That is an excellent result! Nice work, got to be happy with that - over 200kw @ wheels at 4000rpm and nearly 340kw on BP98... imagine it on E85! The old GT3076Rs don't get that much love these days, but they do the job.

Lithium: the 3076r is an awesome turbo for the street. Great mix of response and power on pump fuel. They may not make mega hp but for the 300kw range they are perfect.

I'll be heading to calder park drag strip soonish and will post up vids

So what's the definitive answer on turbo choice to reach this cute little club with the most response possible? On boring 98 that is, with supporting mods ect ect.

I'm thinking GTX3071? Just want to touch 300 or just under, typically seeing 290kw ish @20 psi on this turbo. Anything better suited?

Edited by owen1r

That is an excellent result! Nice work, got to be happy with that - over 200kw @ wheels at 4000rpm and nearly 340kw on BP98... imagine it on E85! The old GT3076Rs don't get that much love these days, but they do the job.

They dont get much love when there are HTA's in their place :P

Trents confident it will go high 3 hundy to 400kw on e85 or c16.

I'll muck around with the car like this for a while. She's fast :D

363rwkw seems to be the magic number mate, we punished mine and no matter what we did it wouldn't go 1kw more! Same result on NYTSKYs built engine too! They just have nothing left to give after that!

363rwkw seems to be the magic number mate, we punished mine and no matter what we did it wouldn't go 1kw more! Same result on NYTSKYs built engine too! They just have nothing left to give after that!

That's the limit on JEM's dyno, but things would probably be different on the Dynapack - still reckon you should take yours to a hubber sometime, or a dragstrip and get some ridiculous mph ;) That'd put things into perspective! :D

That's the limit on JEM's dyno, but things would probably be different on the Dynapack - still reckon you should take yours to a hubber sometime, or a dragstrip and get some ridiculous mph ;) That'd put things into perspective! :D

Oh yeah good point! Oops...

Will get there this year.... So far i have booked 6 events for the year and hopefully one of them will be Coota!

360kw with better response than I already have is more than enough. If I change turbos ill go forced performance 3076

Yeah nice one! Was the best thing i ever did, drives so much better everywhere off boost and on! In saying that i do miss the 3076 super whistle lol

So what's the definitive answer on turbo choice to reach this cute little club with the most response possible? On boring 98 that is, with supporting mods ect ect.

I'm thinking GTX3071? Just want to touch 300 or just under, typically seeing 290kw ish @20 psi on this turbo. Anything better suited?

T67 8 or 10cm

Its pretty responsive. Sounds like a normal medium frame turbo to me as im running an intake pipe n apexi pod. I've actually never heard a 3076 with the anti surge cover. Are there any up sides apart from sound?

Its pretty responsive. Sounds like a normal medium frame turbo to me as im running an intake pipe n apexi pod. I've actually never heard a 3076 with the anti surge cover. Are there any up sides apart from sound?

There is probably a few vids on my Pootube page "34GEETEETEE1" with the old turbo that will give an indication of sound....

Stock head/block

550cc inj

Chinese exh manifold

Chinese intake manifold

44mm gate

z32 afm

pfc

Gtx 3076 0.82 @26psi

C16 :devil:

362 rwkw

Wow, what is this car to be used for?

Inj 550cc? :blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...