Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey fella's, basicly i'm a boilermaker by trade, have worked on quite a few high profile jobs, the new docklands ferris wheel is one, repairs on the MCG retractable roof, desalination plant and working in power station boilers, after abit of interested in what i do in the wasteland i thought i might post up a few pic's on what i'm doing at the moment.

basicly i'm "spooling" and welding pipe for ESSO, an offshore gas company with 20 odd rig's in the bass strait, the pipe's on these rig's are replaced every 10 year's for safety reasons, so we're making up some new pipe, we welding with TIG for the smaller stuff under 120mm nominal bore (inside diameter of the pipe) and under 8mm wall thickness, anything bigger and we use a special MIG machine made by lincoln weld called an STT (surface tension transfer), basically it pulses the amperage from a lower background setting, to a high peak, the idea being to be able to weld faster then with a stick welder (which is the old hat way of welding big pipe) but with much lower heat input then a MIG as well as almost zero spatter, excesive heat input will cook the aditive's out of the steel making it brittle and prone to cracking, so weld procedure's are strictly adhered to.

these baby's are worth 14k each without a wire feed unit

P1090604.jpg

and another 3k per wire feed

P1090605.jpg

this is an STT weld on the 300mm pipe, the weld's on the 80mm branch are done with TIG

P1090607.jpg

this is the machine we use for TIG, they made by fronius and are worth around 9k each, they do standard and pulse MIG (they pulse from full power to nothing, unlike the STT which pulses from full power to background power, so these are no good for the pipe weld's) TIG welding and stick, and you need to be able to fly an F16 fighter jet to set them up, over 100 separably adjustable parameter's

P1090609.jpg

this is a spool we knocked up in about 8 hours (tacking, not welding), this one bolt's to the header of a compressor, the upright section's with the flanges are 200mm nominal bore pipe with a 12.7mm wall, these are not allowed to be drifted into place when being installed due to vibration issue which can damage the 5 million dollar compressor, so the tolerance once welded has to be spot on, each weld shrink's around 2-2.5mm when welded depending on the root gap which has to be taken into account during fabrication, the section at the front with 6 weld's will shrink 14mm after welding, talking about those flanges, the clamping face is 110mm thick 1.25% cro-mo steel, each flange has 20 38mm high tensile bolts tightened to 1200 NM each, clamping force is 16 tones per join.

P1090606.jpg

this is what we use to cut the pipe to length and bevel then at the same time, the procedure for this job is a 25 degree bevel on each side of the weld

P1090608.jpg

a few completed spool ready to weld

P1090610.jpg

as the pipe's need to hold 1700 PSI of pressure, and the content's is natural gas making it incredibly dangerous if a weld fails while the gas rig is in operation each weld is gammer ray tested and X ray tested to detect imperfection's in the weld metal such as porosity, inclusions and lack of fusion, each test cost's around $1000, we weld these on a "butt rate" which means we get paid per weld, with any repair's getting completed in our own time and we cover the cost of the extra gammer and x ray, we get $120 per weld, and a good welder can do a weld in 35 minutes, good welder's get in 15 a day

There's a good chance that we supplied the pipe and fittings for this.

I'm a bit surprised at the unprotected RF's on the weld necks, you guys must be good at keeping things separated (unlike some peanuts out there).

It's good to see you're proud of your work, well done.

That machine, which I assume is an oxy torch for pipes looks AWESOME!

Everything else is pretty darn cool, especially knowing how much you're going to shrink a pipe by!

dead on thumbsup.gif just an oxy with a swivel head for the bevel and the chain and gear arrangement to keep in traveling around the pipe, worth around 2k it's amazing how much some of these thing's cost

There's a good chance that we supplied the pipe and fittings for this.

I'm a bit surprised at the unprotected RF's on the weld necks, you guys must be good at keeping things separated (unlike some peanuts out there).

It's good to see you're proud of your work, well done.

if that's the case then tell whoever machines the bloody things we only want 1mm landing on the flanges, grinding to back is a pain in the ass

if that's the case then tell whoever machines the bloody things we only want 1mm landing on the flanges, grinding to back is a pain in the ass

As we're a distributor, we have to take what's given to us. Special requests bump up the costs somewhat and it's not something that our customers wish to bear.

What this means unfortunately is that you, the fabricator, have to use your magic touch to make things right.

The only people who get what they want is Woodside, but believe me, they pay for it. Just one of the fittings (header tank with 4 test rings) that passed through my projects warehouse last week cost them over $180k, including air freight and testing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...