Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I thought I would replace my 7psi actuator with a 10psi r32 one.. BUT.. look what I found when I took the heat shield off..

Could someone PLEASE confirm whether the flapper opens by this amount below, or is it being restricted by the heat sheild backing plate?

Video

Closed?

IMG669.jpg

Open?

IMG668.jpg

backing plate for Heat shield

IMG670.jpg

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/396495-does-this-look-normal/
Share on other sites

Does it move more if you take the heat shield bracket off? Changing the dump flange thickness would then affect the opening angle.

As Stao said, its not critical as long as you don't get boost spiking at the top end.

Cheers for the replies so far guys. Appreciate the quick ones.

The turbo has ALWAYS crept up. Even when I was running the stock ecu, it would creep up from 7psi through to 15psi. Now its making 275kw @ 18psi with creep.

Its not the factory turbo btw, its a heavily moddified factory turbo running ht18 core with bigger wheels etc etc.

I can see the flapper hitting the backing plate. I have a feeling its restricting it.. I'll take it off, but 1 of the bolts is an allen key bolt with not much space for me to crack it open.. grr.

So...ended up the bracket indeed was restricting the flapper.. Agreed that the flapper will not open 90 degree..but it fixed my prob.. It holds 10 psi through to around 6k in 2nd..which is how far I took it..before it would creep up to around 16 psi at the same rev.

Also put on an r32 actuator and now it's a different car. 1st gear is useless now.. 2nd breaks traction too but not as bad. Lol.

Feels like it's making way more power now. Now to fit my ebc..and get a retune to hit 300 hopefully...tune was made very rich due to creep.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...