Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys I need ya help about a month ago I bought a 89 r32 gtst and its been running real rich I don't know why I'll let you know a couple of things that were already done when I bought it the turbo has been taken off and it has a r33 AFM and I think it still runs a turbo computer it hesitate's till 2000rpm then it pulls really hard sumtimes it just lights up both back wheels

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Whow whow whow!

Are you trying to say, that you have a turbod car, removed the turbo, and thought the car would run fine like that?

Oh my Jesus. Why did you remove the turbo?

There's not enough facepalm pics on the interwebz to suffice,is there?

Ok, we need some clarification.

The turbo was taken off....and a new one put on in it's place. Right?

If not, there is no freakin' way in hell it's EVER going to "light up both back wheels". An RB20de-t wouldn't have the nuts to pull the skin off a custard. Perhaps your clutch is rooted?

If it does not have a turbo, then there's your problem. Why don't you put the turbo back on? Otherwise short of an aftermarket ECU and a dyno tune, it's never going to run well.

Lol I bet my left nut it doesnt go hard. I reckon I could beat you on a push bike.

Are you on your p's?

Cowboy: I gather there is no turbo!

Frozenbrain (chris) you got yourself a car that has been molested, put the turbo back on or give it to me and Ill show you what you should do with it!

If not, there is no freakin' way in hell it's EVER going to "light up both back wheels". An RB20de-t wouldn't have the nuts to pull the skin off a custard. Perhaps your clutch is rooted?

.

What oher sayings could we use for this?

Couldn't pull a sailor off your sister is one that springs to mind.

LOL @ goes gard....8.5:1 comp NA RB20 with turbo cams, rich as hell, f**k all timing

Id be it would be hard to go up a hill

Man it doesnt matter how many times you ask if that ecu is cheap.

For you to call us f**kheads is just idiotic. A f**khead would remove a turbo from a rb20, whereas the people who posted in this thread would not do so.

Look at that poor car. Also in your info, you cant say you have a 32 gtst. Theres no f**kin turbo.

Someone talk some sense into this kid please.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...