Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You're the 2nd person to say that recently

But I recall playing with on and wasn't even close?????

Maybe slight differences is some of the rear drive sumps

Or the guy had the wrong sump lol

Rb20 and 30 sumps won't fit from what iv heard

25 sump does fit the 26 block but a notch has to be made for the pickup I did it last week

Blake was it a Stagea block? I know they are pre-drilled for both sumps. You do need to notch out around the AWD pickup location to get the RWD sump on and then you can modify the oil pickup but cutting and brazing it to the right angle and location.

sorry for the late reply, was playing footy, f**k id be lost without you guys haha, thanks for all your input!!!! My engines a S2 RB25 with around 80k on the clock, had a RB20 that put no' 4 and 5 through the block, holy f**k it went bang! lol also VCT isnt currently connected, because im awesome at forgetting things when i built the wiring loom i forgot the vct and wiper motor hahaha, but ile have that sorted, i played with it on the dyno and gained 40hp in the mid from just connecting it, mind you it went too about 14:1 =O, my plans were a G3 Turbo from HyperGear, but i spoke too someone who knows more about turbos then most tuners in australia lol, going with the GTX30/76 and im not going to go the FFP, just hate the look of the stock manifold

Are you wanting more or less than 300rwkw on PULP? The GTX results really haven't been stellar on PULP and sub 20psi.

If you want 300rwkw or less on PULP get a run of the mill GT3076, tried and well proven for that range. Cheaper as well.

The GTX you really need to stuff more boost into it, and E85. Which will see you to 350rwkw easily with 7500rpm, but that's going beyond stock motor limits realistically if you want to last for a reasonable amount of time

Blake was it a Stagea block? I know they are pre-drilled for both sumps. You do need to notch out around the AWD pickup location to get the RWD sump on and then you can modify the oil pickup but cutting and brazing it to the right angle and location.

Na it was a 32 gtr motor I just tiged all the pipe to make a pickup but I'm not sure on if the pickup has to be changed if you look on my build thread there are photos of it on there

Are you wanting more or less than 300rwkw on PULP? The GTX results really haven't been stellar on PULP and sub 20psi.

If you want 300rwkw or less on PULP get a run of the mill GT3076, tried and well proven for that range. Cheaper as well.

The GTX you really need to stuff more boost into it, and E85. Which will see you to 350rwkw easily with 7500rpm, but that's going beyond stock motor limits realistically if you want to last for a reasonable amount of time

I was considering just going a GT30/76, but im going to be running E85 and possibly WMI aswell so fingers crossed i wont have too run much over 18psi and i defently wont be running over 20psi lol, ile also be buying the 6boost twin scroll manifold, .82 twin scroll exhaust housing on the GTX 30/76 and a plazman manifold, 1000cc DI injectors twin 300lph fuel pumps and eventually when the S2 RB25 pops ile just buy a neo and build it, i figure ile regret buying just a GT series later down the track when i want more power.

Edited by 51NNA

If it was just a street car id get one of the Thailand made turbos from kando or hypergear but im not going too risk it, 1600 for a billet wheel hypergear or 1750 for a garret, what would you go? lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...