Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Car is an S13 with a CA18 in it, original 145ks on the odometer, unopened.

At the last track day I filled my catch can twice and wasn't making the power I thought it should given the recent mods (I realise the power component of this equation could be tuning alone). A compression test (cold/dry) cam up with 155-160 across the board, new is 170 or so (warm and wet) according to the FSM.

I've since bought a leak down tester and had some odd results. When dialing in some pressure from the regulator, 100psi,The leak down % gauge (it's a twin gauge model) reads off the chart whether it's hooked up to a cylinder or not, and by off the chart I mean 0 is a fully blown cylinder and the other end of the gauge is perfect seal, it's going well beyond the perfect seal portion. As it's a cheap gauge I'm not surprised.

That part aside, if I ignore the % gauge and just use te tool to fill a cylinder and listen for leaks, at 100psi I have noticeable air flow from the valve cap hole (or the dip stick if I put that back in), or the pod filter if I seal that back up and let the air flow from the rockers to the catch can and back into the intake piping.

I realise there will always be some air flow through these channels but how much air should really be flowing past the rings and into the sump, pressuring everything else. Should this be minimal? I'm confident I'm at TDC on the compression stroke also.

To add to the mystery, the car has also been using coolant but there was no air flow in the radiator during my testing of cyl 1, I will test the rest, but I thought I'd stop and clarify what sort of air flow I should hear coming from the valve covers. It seems like a bit to me given it was only 100psi of pressure.

Is it as simple as needing to do the test on a warn engine and am I using the thing wrong if the % leak down gauge climbs up to the set position with only 10-20psi of air in it and then climbs way beyond if you add more? Seems like there should be some way to add the amount of air you want then set that gauge so it knows this is your starting point.

Assistance always appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400606-leak-down-test-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It sounds like your "original" 145,000kms is actually 345,000kms.

It doesn't matter how much you convince yourself it has done what's on the odometer, 99.9% of the time it has been wound back.

Have you done a proper compression and leak down test?

I guess my point was missed, I don't think 145ks is a small amount on a 23yr old turbo car, I also couldn't care less if it was 445ks, I put that detail in there more for the "unopened" part. The car at the very least has a full service history since coming into Australia which was 70ks ago, all signs show it to have been well looked atfer and a fairly original car, so my "guess" is it still has the original, and no doubt tired, rings in it.

As mention in my first post, compression test came back as 155-160 across the board. cold/dry, new is 170-172ish.

My leak down tester is playing funny buggers on the % leak gauge, as mentioned above, and I can clearly hear air coming from the valve covers, while I know there will always be "some" amount of blow by, should it be that obvious at 100psi on the regulator.

Edited by ActionDan

I cant see anyway around a rebuild, you could try and cheat and take the rocker covers off and close up the gap on the baffles (not sure if you can on CA engines, I used to do this on Toyota's when turboing a NA engine) this would limit the blow of oil blow but not the gas. The lower power figures would suggest worn rings but without seeing the car or knowing the mods its just a guess.

Edited by 51NNA

That was my next question, if it's shot, why would static compresssion read nicely?

I'm certainly going to return the tester, but in the meantime, my question boils down to how much air flow i should hear/feel from the oil cap and dipstick on a healthy engine. I realise that's a very hard question to answer, but given it spat out 2L of oil at the last track day (I don't think it was over filled at the time) it made me think there's just too much boost and the rings can't hold it all in, or maybe the valve seats are shot and it's escaping into the rockers directly?

I've just had a bit more of a fiddle, disassembled the leak down % gauge, adjusted the needle so now it sits at the starting position properly when there's no air supplied. I'll do some more testing when I can get away with running the compressor for extended periods.

You definitely have more then 100psi coming in from your compressor too when checking and are you certain you are holding it on TDC on whichever pot you are checking? I know when we do it, it can be difficult to hold the piston at TDC accurately when waiting for the leak down gauge to stabilise as the pressure builds. Once you have the gauge reading properly let us know what you get.

But typical issues would be there for sure given the age of the engine. Rings would need replacing, valves and valve seats would be carboned up and leaking. Good chance valve guides and valve guide seals are shot and they too can be a cause of leakage. If you spat 2L of oil out then its more then likely a blow by issue from the lack of ring seal.

"You definitely have more then 100psi coming in from your compressor too when checking" <-- is this a question or a statement?

"are you certain you are holding it on TDC on whichever pot you are checking?" Yep, if I rotate the engine backwards the intake port opens implying it's on the comp stroke, if it was TDC on the exhaust stroke I'd have to rotate forward to crack the intake valve. I also removed the upper time cover and checked the marks,

I should be able to do some more testing tonight or tomorrow.

There are two other things that have come to mind that bother me.

1 - To get the % leak gauge to the set position only requires 20-30psi of air, when I connect that to the cylinder of course it's going to show a huge difference straight up because it's now connected to a large volume of space it has to pressureise, so I'm guessing I should be waiting for the tool top pressurise that newly available space first?

2 - In the end of the hose that connects to the spark plug adaptor, there's a one way valve, like on a bike tyre. I can see now way for that valve to ever be acted upon by the compressed air and there's nothing in the spark plug adapter to act on the needle either. The only way I could get air into the cylinder was to remove that valve.

I spent some more time on it tonight and with the leak down % gauge on set it's only reading 10-20psi on the regulator side (ideally I would like to swap out the second gauge for just another 0-150psi gauge that way i can just compare the two readings and do my own % calculation as the leak % gauge is dodgy as hell).

Never the less, I tested each cylinder cold/dry on both TDC positions (just before TDC actually) so I could be sure I was on the comp stroke TDC as the exhaust stroke TDC obviously allows plenty of air to escape the valve prior to true TDC.

In each test the gauge gave me approx 30% leakage, and that was at only 10-20psi input pressure. In each example I could clearly feel/hear air escaping from the dipstick.

What I can't work out is how the comp test could read so well if it's that shagged. (When i did my comp test it was a dead cold motor that had been sitting for a week or more so it was dry/cold and it came back around 155-160 each cylinder.)

Keeping in mind the reason I started down this path is because the car spat out a heap of oil at the last track day, which it has never done before, and only after I swapped to a JDM S15 turbo and put in some more boost. So my guess is the rings just can't hold the extra pressure, but as I said if it was shagged why did the comp test come back good - and where is my coolant going! If it was a head gasket, surely I'd have seen bubbles in the radiator? Or maybe not when it's cold/dry and not enough pressure to show up a headgasket leak.

My other thought is it's so little input pressure that it's just cruising around the rings and not supply enough pressure to seal them up properly.

Perplexed!

I can't help feeling that you are not doing the leak down test right - if leakage really was 30% would your compressions be so high? Perhaps you should repeat the compression test with a hot motor and then do the oil down the spark plug hole trick to see if there is any change to give you a clue as to ring condition.

I haven't had time to post more but I needed two people to do this.

Someone needs to be under the car with a socket on the harmonic balancer bolt, rotating the engine back and forth ever so slightly while you are watching the gauge peak and drop off. The gap between TDC and a valve opening is 2 tents of f**k all and is hard to get.

The pressure you put into the cylinder will also push the piston down enough and cause a valve to open f**king up your readings.

My mate was having trouble holding against 170psi so in assuming 100psi is even enough to push down a piston.

I can't help feeling that you are not doing the leak down test right - if leakage really was 30% would your compressions be so high? Perhaps you should repeat the compression test with a hot motor and then do the oil down the spark plug hole trick to see if there is any change to give you a clue as to ring condition.

Chances are you're right and I've been asking myself that same question about leak vs compression test results.

I've got a buddy with a freshly built CA that I'm going to test for comparison.

I dont think your gauge is upto scratch. You may need to get another one or exchange it to compare results. It is not making any sense.

No doubt the leak down % gauge is suspect, I was thinking of replacing it with a standard 0-150psi gauge and I can just compare the two readings.

I haven't had time to post more but I needed two people to do this.

Someone needs to be under the car with a socket on the harmonic balancer bolt, rotating the engine back and forth ever so slightly while you are watching the gauge peak and drop off. The gap between TDC and a valve opening is 2 tents of f**k all and is hard to get.

The pressure you put into the cylinder will also push the piston down enough and cause a valve to open f**king up your readings.

My mate was having trouble holding against 170psi so in assuming 100psi is even enough to push down a piston.

I've mulled this over as well and spent considerable time testing in and around both instances of TDC in the cycle. I'm using fairly low pressures, see above, so I can work it myself, when I rock the piston back and forth the results get worse (implying a valve opening) but never better than about 30% and on rare occassions 20% .

If you watch this clip, this is the method I'm using and almost identical gauge, mine doesn't have the sticker down the side but given everything else is identical my guess is that's just another branded version of what is a mass produced item.

I've tried turning the reg pressure up also (ignoring the set gauge) to see if the extra pressure helps seal the rings, nope, just more hissing from the dipstick.

Yeah no worries, you fund it and I'll get going :D

I need to know if it's a legit problem first, then I can decide if I just plumb back the catch into the sump, run thicker oil and turn the boost down to get a few more track days in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
×
×
  • Create New...