Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys. Got a noob question for all. I recently replaced my standard shocks and springs with another standard set that I got off a forum member as I thought they were busted. Got the mechanic to swap them over whilst it was on the hoist for a service. But after the swap, I found that the car was bouncing all over the shop like a boat on choppy waters whenever I went over uneven roads. Previously, this didn't happen. Now whenever I went a little too quick over the bump, my front bar will go smack on the tarmac. *Ouch* Had a look at the shocks and found 3 of them leaking pretty badly and the mechanic also confirmed that they were shot, though he was surprised as he said they looked ok when he put them in. Being money tight, I thought of getting another replacement standard set from the wreckers. But because the standard sets out there could possibly be on their way out as well due to being 17-19 years old, I'm also considering second hand coilovers as well. So, just like some opinion from the experts here on which option is a better choice. Feeling a little stupid as I'm probably better off not getting a replacement in the first place as the original ones were pretty ok except for one of the rears which was leaking.

Edited by LNah

It all comes down to money and what you want out of the car TBH.

A new set of shocks will be alot cheaper than a DECENT set of coilovers

what kind of power is it putting out? where do you want to go with the car? is it being driven daily or does ride comfort not bother you?

The engine's stock standard at stock boost. Only real mods are the catback and intercooler as the current power output is quite sufficient for me on the streets. Since I only use it on the street daily 100% of the time, I can say that ride comfort is quite impt though I don't want it to be too soft as I kind of feel that the stock spring rates are quite soft for me. The previous set of springs are fine with only one rear shock being busted. Have you ever come across aftermarket shocks with standard springs in them? Apologies if this question sounds nooby.

It all comes down to money and what you want out of the car TBH.

A new set of shocks will be alot cheaper than a DECENT set of coilovers

what kind of power is it putting out? where do you want to go with the car? is it being driven daily or does ride comfort not bother you?

Go some BC Coilovers (V1 Model) in 8kg/6kg. This is what I have and there pretty bearable on the street and not overly expensive

If your not interested in racing/drifting one day then these will do fine for every day driving + occasional drag day.

What are you using the car for? Street? Track? Drift? Drag? All of the above lol?

Where is the car lacking? Roll? Ride (pitch/squat)? Yaw?

If its for the street, then I suggest the following:

Step 1: Replace un-serviceable shocks

Step 2: Upgrade front and rear sway bars.

Step 3: Enjoy.

Reason

For arguments sake, assume the car is either in perfect roll or ride situations.

Let the right components control the aspects of vehicle dynamics they were intended to control. Shock/springs manage ride aspects of the car (absorbing bumps, pitch/squat etc.) whilst also adding some roll stiffness. Sway bars control the roll aspects of the vehicle when cornering. Don't compromise your ride comfort by running too stiffer springs to make up for a lack of roll control. Alas, upgrade your sway bars to decrease the level of roll which will in turn yield better cornering performance.

The factory shock/spring combo with some upgraded sways bars is more than enough if all you're doing is street duties with some light occasional hill runs. Sway bars are, by far, the best bang for your buck suspension upgrade. Id suggest upgrading sway bars first, then bushes (the car is getting long in the tooth and probably hasn't seen replacement bushes), then shocks and springs matched to one another. Most people do this in the reverse order!

Another point: your suspension is only going to be as good as your tyres allow. On the street, even the grippiest of cheap semi slicks (Federal RSR's etc.) would require some stiffer spring rates over stock. Even then, not to the extent which most Jap "coil overs" run.

Edited by R32Abuser

Thanks guys. Like I said, car's only for street use 100% of the time and I was under the impression that the original factory shocks needed replacing. Right now, either I get a decent replacement or I fit the original ones back on and live with it till I have enough dough for a full replacement of everything. But one more question. Will the factory bushes be good enough or urethane ones are better for the street only? I understand that many of you folks use the urethane ones for your track cars, but since I only street it 100% of the time, probably factory Nissan ones?

Urethane is perfectly suitable for the street. It offers increased rigidity over stock rubber bushes which improves suspension/handling predictability whilst still retaining good ride characteristics. Bare in mine, it will increase vehicle NVH which is felt in the cabin but only by a small amount.

I would NEVER replace my suspension components with OEM replacements when the Urethane equivalent is of equal value if not cheaper.

All standard shock will be farked 3 times over by now. You're doing it wrong.

If I gave you cylinder full of oil and gas which was sealed by a sliding rubber grommet over a metal rod that had been used for 15 years and slide up and down 5 thousand times a day......how much oil and gas to you think would be left inside ? And how would that rubber grommet be looking by now?

Replacement original rubber bushes isn't such a bad idea. Polyurethane bushes on everything would noticeably increase NVH (I have about half mine done) but you get performance benefits.

Edited by simpletool

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...