Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You're thinking into this too much Ruxis.

SAU can be held liable when they organise a cruise because they are the organisation in charge of the forum.

The fact is, a user on a car forum won't be held liable for organising an unofficial cruise simply because there is no proof that it was you exactly who posted the car meet.

Whilst it might have come from your IP address, doesnt mean you were the one using your account at that time.

I'd think that you can only be held liable if you admit to being at fault for organising the meet at the scene of the accident. That is considered evidence.

For once benji you have made sense, hmm alright if I post an event (:P) I'll do it under a blanket so no one can see me or prove it was me. Some mother f**ker broke in posted it and left!!

Haha mat that rule doesn't apply to me, I'm not as... Special as you :P

I would be really supprised official or not that the organiser would get in trouble unless any action they did actually caused a problem.

for example,

if someone turns up, acts like a dick, crashes and kills him self and someone else in the process through no fault of his own, i cant see anyone else being blamed but the driver at fault.

although if the event put attendees or the public in danger through the planned actions, ie maybe stopping a whole bunch of cars in the middle of the road on a blind corner that causes an accident.. well that could be another story, but i think there would be so many loop holes to this that would put blame back onto drivers directly involved for there own actions.

its not like were blocking of roads and using them to race illegally. were just driving from point a to point, people are responsible for them selves...

this is just my 2 cents, and would be very suprised to hear that an organiser had ever been held responsible for anything going down legally in the past where actually activites were legal.

I would be really supprised official or not that the organiser would get in trouble unless any action they did actually caused a problem.

for example,

if someone turns up, acts like a dick, crashes and kills him self and someone else in the process through no fault of his own, i cant see anyone else being blamed but the driver at fault.

although if the event put attendees or the public in danger through the planned actions, ie maybe stopping a whole bunch of cars in the middle of the road on a blind corner that causes an accident.. well that could be another story, but i think there would be so many loop holes to this that would put blame back onto drivers directly involved for there own actions.

its not like were blocking of roads and using them to race illegally. were just driving from point a to point, people are responsible for them selves...

this is just my 2 cents, and would be very suprised to hear that an organiser had ever been held responsible for anything going down legally in the past where actually activites were legal.

So to sum up Ants essay here........... J-RAD stop being a shit stirrer and go organise a cruise :P I did it, no problems and i'm not even a Newcastle Exec :laugh:

Ah well you can be secretary cause you have all the contacts

How's that sounds

Well I do look good in fishnets......

But nah I'm just here for the skids! :woot:

ill do it if u dont wanna jarrad,putty rd it is whos in lol

I wanna do a charity run up there to support the Westpac Chopper but will need to organise that one properly

ill do it if u dont wanna jarrad,putty rd it is whos in lol

There is a putty road cruise on the 16th Dec for members

I wanna do a charity run up there to support the Westpac Chopper but will need to organise that one properly

Yeah that one needs to be done with a lot o planning, will be epic if done properly

me and martin are hunting for roads sat arvo :)

you can do the next one blake :D

Lol skids!!

I might take a run out Dungog Thursday night with Gaz and have a feed at a random pub....

Yep Putty road cruise is good BUT the charity cruise will need some work, I've got a few ideas up my sleeve....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...