Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I've had a bit of a look around, but I can't seem to find a definitive answer.

Would appreciate something from the tech-heads preferably, but anything's good so long as it's accurate.

A couple of clients/friends are building a GQ Patrol for the SA Offroad Champs, and the vehicle is going to have a mid-mounted RB25 in it. Under the regs of the sport class they cannot use the standard motor, and would prefer to run a forced 6 cylinder instead of a V8, so the motor is going to compiled from an RB25/30 combination, as the motor must be < 3000cc.

More to the point, the car is being built to a spec is mindful of their budget & class.

That's not the current concern though, currently they'retrying to sniff out some information regarding the factory RB25 flywheel, because the motor was an automatic from a Stagea half-cut. How much does the factory flywheel weigh?

No need for suggestions on aftermarket options either, the guys are machinists amongst many things, and will be manufacturing most of the components themselves for the vehicle build.

While I'm here too.... This is unrelated to the topic title, but - What is the torque/power rating of the standard RB26/GTR transmission?

Cheers in advance for any help,

Rick.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/402457-rb25-flywheel-weight/
Share on other sites

Not necessarily, things aren't always engineered from an aftermarket point of view, they're engineered to a torque rating.

Every manufacturer wants their vehicles to see out the warranty without paying out the nose for ongoing factory recalls, so things are always engineered or over-engineered to withstand a minimum specification.

The 'X' amount of extra power & torque from the 2.6 litre, plus the increased load on the drivetrain from an AWD format, means generally they'll install a larger clutch, to compensate for that. So the flywheel will be larger, respectively.

That doesn't necessarily mean it's heavier, of course.

But they could have just provided the same flywheel for all models/variants, but I don't know... that's why I'm here! ;)

Stronger clutch, yes. Bigger diameter, no. Therefore bigger flywheel, no.

Face it, the RB26 didn'tmake that much more torque than the 25, and not a whole lot more power. And the flywheel is almost the same (if not the same) between the piddly little RB20 and the 26.

A 10kg flywheel is overengineered by a factor of a bazzillion for an RB26.

(Yes, I am an engineer).

Guys, thank you very much for your time! :)

I do find it interesting that they kept the same flywheel from RB20 through to RB26 though, on all models. Strange indeed.

But I guess they knew what they were doing, and that's all that matters.

See I hail from the Pulsar mob... SR20's are commonly used, and there is a distinct difference in the variants, from RWD to FWD/AWD and GTiR. GTiR is commonly known as the black sheep, because 99% of it is different to other SR variants, and thus usually not interchangeable. The flywheel & clutch is one of those things... Ours are around a 215mm clutch, and the GTiR is around 245mm. Then of course, the flywheels are different to compensate.

So I figured maybe there might be a difference between models in the same fashion, but obviously not.

All the same - I got the information I was after anyway, so thanks again guys! :)

Rick.

Yeah, too true.

That was the idea of finding out... Briant (the owner/builder) wants to machine one up from scratch, but simply wanted to compare the standard TB42DE flywheel, to the RB25DET they bought to throw in the car.

Most of this is R&D, because the RB motor will likely be copping the GQ's FS5R50A transmission. He's a machinist, so making the components is not an issue for him.

Thanks again Elite/Daniel.

Edited by car_fanatica

Yeah no problem.

The RB25DE grenade has a shorter pin than the RB25DET grenade. Turbo models were nodular cast iron, non turbo models and RB30 flywheels are regular cast iron.

If you are going to be making torque/hp, you need to consider an aftermarket flywheel. NPC do the revsolution flywheels at 6.5kgs at approx $400-$450.

The worst thing for that setup is the weight of the car. There is a lot more load on the clutch and drivetrain so it's even more important to consider non-cast iron options when it comes to flywheels

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...