Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Word.

R33GTS-t

Say for a setup which consists of a frount mount intercooler, full 3 inch exhaust, cold air intake, standard turbo at 12psi what would be the expected increase of a Power FC over a S.A.F.C. fitted to this setup ?

And same question on the same system with a standard turbo high flowed for 16psi ?

I know one benefit would be the removal of the speed/boost restrictors....but I'm interested if there is a major gain between the fitting of a S.A.F.C. over a Power FC

ANDREW

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/
Share on other sites

At 12psi I'd say there would'nt be hardly any benefit in the extra money for the Power FC, however with a large turbo @16psi there would be, considering you may need a Z32 AFM and injectors to safely keep it in tune. It all depends on what power you want for eg. the stock injectors and AFM are good for 210-220rwkw so I'm told. As a guide FMIC,exhaust,SAFC,fuel pump and stock turbo@12psi achieved 188rwkw for my car.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-65289
Share on other sites

You've seen the results shown around here haven't you? Someone got 45rwhp from a tuned SAFC. That really is quite a fair bit, so if you aren't sure I'd just go with a SAFC. It's just cheaper and provides the bulk of the power that the PowerFC gives you.

That said, I'd say the Power FC would probably give you that little bit extra to take you over the 200rwkw mark at 12psi if I use turbomad's and other ppl like Ethan's results as a guide. I have a SAFC which is untuned at the moment, but I'll probably post a thread with my dyno results when I do get it tuned.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-65457
Share on other sites

Sorry if I am hijacking the thread here dude...

Surely there are other concerns other than power when choosing between a PowerFC and the SAFC?

One big one for me would be throttle response and drivability - surely the PowerFC is going to give you sharper mapping of the timing, ignition, fuel and boost in a coordinated way to make the overall driving experience more fun (and give a few more kw)?

If you were to start from scratch (like I am with a freshly imported R33 GTST), wouldnt the PowerFC and the boost control module be a better choice than a SAFC and separate boost controller?

I have used bleed valves before on my WRX, and they were awful - boost would bleed away at the top end when you want it... an EBC totally changed the power curve of the car so I dont think I would be happy with that to go with a SAFC.

So that means the SAFC with AVC-R (I think thats the Apexi boost controller?) vs the PowerFC and boost module is the comparison.

The SAFC/AVC-R setup is a little cheaper, but surely you lose crispness in power delivery and some Kw as you cant adjust timing (or am I incorrect??).

I had a Unichip and once they leaned up the fuel AND advanced the timing appropriately the WRX was so much crisper and responsive to drive it felt like a different car... just my 2cents.

Conrad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66084
Share on other sites

Conrad

the boost control option on the PFC is crap, yes it does the job but no where as good as the AVCR.

the SAFC does the fuel side and allows manual advanment of the timing. while the PFC controls the fuel and timing and has more tuning points.

drivability isn't that different, but they main guide i'd go with is if you plab on upgrading the turbo in the future. if so go the PFC as the safc just want cut the mustard once the stock injectors reach 100% duty cycle.

to answer Andrews (peakRPM) question the PFC would give a better power return due to it controlling both fuel and timing and having more mapping points.It would also allow you to do further mods more easily in the future such as bigger injectors, turbo etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66093
Share on other sites

skyzer33, can you give me some more info on your points?

Why is the boost control on the PFC crap, whats wrong with it?

And what do you mean 'manual advancement' of the timing?

Do you mean by change the AFM signal it inadvertantly causes some level of timing change, or does it actually have timing maps? I checked the website and it doesnt really talk about anything other than fuel mapping...

So what would you recommend - using a SAFC and an AVC-R together? I guess if its cheaper and easy to map than the PFC it would be an ok option as I dont plan on replacing the turbo with a different one (unless it lets go then I might jump up to something larger.. maybe).

Thanks for the info, I am still getting up to speed on this gear for the R33 - the WRX was great with a Unichip and boost module, but obviously the skyline is a different beast (and I really hate the self learning dribble with the factory ecu's part of my reasoning for wanting a replacement ecu rather than an intercept unit).

Ta

Conrad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66687
Share on other sites

If you don't plan on replacing the turbo then go the SAFC. Remember if you go a large turbo you may have to change injectors and AFM which in turn will demand the fitment of the Power FC, it kind of snowballs in price at this stage. This is where I am at the moment, I'm looking for a suitable turbo that will run my injectors and AFM and ECU/SAFC to the max and if I can make 210rwkw then that's what I'll have to be happy with.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66739
Share on other sites

Can someone clarify what level of control over ignition timing the SAFC provides? I thought it purely controlled the AFM voltage level in an intercept function to trick the sotck ecu, so you are finitely limited by the fuel maps of the stock ecu and have to deal with the ecu 'learning', and potentially retarding the timing if detonation occurs.

I guess if the SAFC CAN do ignition timing I will look at it..

Ta

Conrad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66832
Share on other sites

slayer

the safc tricks the ecu into thinking ur running stock fuel ratios which allows you to advance the timing without the ecu retarding it thats what i meant by manually adjusting the timing.

why the PFC boost add on is crap. it does its job well but there are some issues with it at higher boost levels. Plus the AVCR is better more features and has fuzzy logic.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66866
Share on other sites

the dyno charts of my car after install of PowerFC WITHOUT tuning jumped about 25rwhp...

After tuning saw more like 45rwhp.

At 12psi (controlled by Blitz Dual SBC), it turns 271.3hp/202kw @ rears.

Will post the dyno chart if i get a chance. Stock, plug-in, tune, re-tune are all on the same graph.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66936
Share on other sites

Power FC is the way to go, why half do it with an SAFC?

The gains and tuning ability of the power FC make it the better choice especially with the price you can pick them up for second hand these days.....

plug and play

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66951
Share on other sites

Slayer - The SAFC cannot do ignition control... That's why it's just a SAFC... IF you want ignition control then you'll have to get the ITC.

As someone who's used both (SAFC & Powerfc, (and even unichip)), I can tell you from experience that if you can afford to spend the extra $$$ you fork out for the powerfc is definitely worth it.

That being said, there's nothing wrong with the SAFC for a lightly tuned car with the standard injectors, just beware that it is an interceptor, and doesn't alter the overall tune, it effectively just alters the voltage the ecu see's that the AFM is sending it.

Oh - and the best feature of the powerfc, is you can tell if your car is pinging!

matt

Originally posted by slayer

Can someone clarify what level of control over ignition timing the SAFC provides? I thought it purely controlled the AFM voltage level in an intercept function to trick the sotck ecu, so you are finitely limited by the fuel maps of the stock ecu and have to deal with the ecu 'learning', and potentially retarding the timing if detonation occurs.

I guess if the SAFC CAN do ignition timing I will look at it..

Ta

Conrad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-67031
Share on other sites

LOL - while I'm happy to tell you, my motor doesn't bear much resemblence to an RB25 anymore :D In any case... Most it'll usually go to is between 20-30 @ wot, with the occasional spike to 50, which is usually when I come off the throttle.

When I had my '25, it was about the same...

matt

Originally posted by 2rismo

Out of interest, mate, what does your knock readout go to on different types of fuel, fuel + octane booster etc...

Just interested.

Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-67186
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...