Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi people,

I tried searching for the -5 Vs -10 thread however I could not find it, this topic may be a little different as the car is running on e85.

Key considerations

- Motor is a fully built Rb 26 (26 bottom end)

- 262 in/ex cams

- Car is built for street/drag

- The car made 420 rwkws on 20 psi, we tried raising the boost however there was no power gain (I believe turbo’s were out of puff)

- Fuel system is more than capable of 500+ kws

My questions are

1. How much laggier would -10s be compared to -5s (running e85 can put more timing into it)

2. Is there an in-between turbo or any other turbo suggestions that will get me up to 500rwks?? (please keep in mind that this is a street car and needs to be low mounts)

Attached is my current dyno graph

Thanks

Daz

post-3332-0-05070100-1342520445_thumb.jpg

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

http://www.skylinesa...age__hl__piggaz

There you go.

Quick answer. If it's a 2.6 don't bother. It will become a nugget.

*Awaits for the can of worms to be opened*

Gav made 460 + on the baby -5's. It's just a matter of setup.

http://www.skylinesa...age__hl__piggaz

There you go.

Quick answer. If it's a 2.6 don't bother. It will become a nugget.

*Awaits for the can of worms to be opened*

Gav made 460 + on the baby -5's. It's just a matter of setup.

Question answered, close thread ;)

For a twin set up chasing that power I wouldn't use -10s, it will just be a laggy peice of crap.. Especially on 2.6.

You probs won't make 500 on -5s but It's probs your best option if you wanna make big power on twin low mounts..

Unless you wanna run a pair of the new GTX turbos.. You should do that :)

Edited by GTR_JOEY

Dan, what's involved in being the test dummy?

Someone is already interested in trying them but I could ask for a second pair maybe. Still waiting for info back to confirm the comp cover is going to fit against the standard manifold

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
    • Yes sir am asking is there possible way from aem tuner from wiring pins 
    • Have you checked cam to crank timing and confirmed balancer marks are correct?
×
×
  • Create New...