Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Almost a complete package,

I can supply the front 6piston calipers not pictured for and extra $2500 for someone who wants the complete kit.

at a total of $5500 making it the cheapest V8 supercar kit i have seen up for sale.

(the 6 piston calipers will come direct from the race team to you)

Rotors are brand new: 375mm x 35mm fronts.

343mm x 32mm Rear.

Alcon Monobloc rear racing caliper: Body size is, 195mm wide by 255mm long. (the 6 piston is 200.5mm x 300mm)

Piston size's are, 31.8/41.3mm.

Pad shape, Pagid 1619.

Price:$3000 Firm.

I can have caliper brackets hats machined to suit any car but that will incur extra cost's.

PM, Txt or phone 0431 113 255 for any questions.

Located in Western Australia but can post at competitive rates.

Here are some photos:

20120724_081144.jpg

20120724_081452.jpg

20120724_081437.jpg

20120724_081424.jpg

20120724_081413.jpg

20120724_081328.jpg

20120724_081245.jpg

20120724_081233.jpg

20120724_081213.jpg

and my last caliper bracket:

TA6BRSKY1.jpg

Thanks for looking.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/405426-alcon-v8-supercar-part-package-3000/
Share on other sites

No catch, if anyone has issues with my low post count and no trading history your welcome to review my user on supraforums, i am a well established user on there and antilag. Package was for my supra but ive changed direction, this is advertised on all other forums so i imagine it wont be around for long, stuff like this at this price never usually reaches the forums.

What car/team are the fronts coming from??

I've been looking for a set recently and none of the guys I deal with have anything decent.....

Every supercar Alcon Ive seen has had a different bridge and pad retainer Inc the calipers I pulled of an ex GRM chassis just this afternoon Those look alot like ex Indy/champ car calipers?

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/404689-massive-4-piston-monobloc-race-calipers/page__fromsearch__1

Aren't they "prototype" lemans calipers?

Stickers peeling up seem to indicate they are the same calipers advertised before....

Well if you read the title you may notice the word "part package" and as for the fronts, you obviously dont know the right people, you do realise that they are getting rid of alcon as the supplier because ap racing won the bid.

As for the caliper being a Daytona prototype, yes its from a 2010 riley daytona prototype, much better caliper than the rear that they use in the V8's similar design, pistons are slightly larger and so is the body size, the v8 alcon has stainless steel pistons and a solid bridge.

I dont just live in the world of V8 supercars, i have engineers in lemans teams over in the US and Germany.

The reason i am including the v8 caliper in as a kit because its a good match with the rear that is in the kit, i can get any other 6 piston caliper.

Go worry about other stuff if you not interested, but thanks for the free bump.

I wast aware GRM, techno, 888 and pmm were the wrong people to talk too.

I was actually interested in them and my question about where the fronts were coming from was serious. due to the component change over I know alot of places selling off rubbish that's been tarted up over the years.

I wast aware GRM, techno, 888 and pmm were the wrong people to talk too, I was actually interested in them

"Interested" You sound like the biggest time waster of them all, as for knowing all those teams if you where in the "know" then why dont you have a kit already seeings as you get 1st hand on every caliper there, and as for flogged out calipers, here's one going atm, so much for seasoned old tarted up stuff.

Brand new not even been used at a fraction of the price.

Alcon6potCaliper.jpg

I think you are barking up the wrong tree, risking probably has a list of customers wanting any good used stuff that he can get his hands on, which explains why he is the only person on here that was interested

I have actualy had quite a few enquires and risking wasn't one, im not fussed if someone wants it they will buy it. maybe viewers are waiting for that "price drop" post, i can asure that wont happen, i would rather keep it than sell for less.

Edited by 24jzgte

I think you are barking up the wrong tree, risking probably has a list of customers wanting any good used stuff that he can get his hands on, which explains why he is the only person on here that was interested

Several customers, I have a prioritized list infact of people asking for parts.

Fasttrack are looking for taxi calipers and rotors for some new cars they are building. I had these

in mind for them.

Marshal (one of the owners) would tell me to buy every caliper I possibly can that's serviceable.

I have a car from every stable mentioned other than tekno so why wouldn't I be incontact with

said places regularly....

If your offering those Alcon calipers pictured new, and rotors like you advertised I'll take everything you have and I'll update some of the cars from AP's to these.

No I didn't.

I dont get alot of demand for ex Indy stuff and one of my suppliers came through with a heap of good AP & Alcon touring car gear so I bought all that up instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Either the WG is reaching full opening, or it is not. The "it is not" case could only occur if there was not enough time available to swing the valve fully open during that boost event. I would consider that to be unlikely, as this is a commercial product that is in use elsewhere, so it really should work. But in your case, because there is definitely SOMETHING wrong, it should not be assumed that things like that are working as they should. You should put a video camera where it can see the actuator (if at all possible) during a run to see how far it is moving.
    • I think you're mostly on the ball there. With the straight gate, I suspect the weight of the spring will determine how quickly the gate can close, when not run with active pressure drive on both sides of the diaphragm. Otherwise, with drive on both sides of the diaphragm, you could almost go without a spring at all, only needing one to make sure that the thing was actually closed while completely off boost and not having pressure available to drive it closed. Butterfly valves have mostly symmetric loading when there is flow going through them, meaning that the gas hitting the upstream part of the blade is balanced by the gas hitting the downstream part of the blade, which means you don't need actuator torque to overcome any non-symmetric flow induced loads. But the gas flow does impart a purely normal load against the shaft, which transfers into the bush/bearing at each end of the shaft and does increase the torque required to make the shaft turn. Only a little, but it is there. I have no feeling for the amount of force involved in a WG application, but it certainly could make an argument for a decent spring weight being required. But all of this is just peripheral to the actual problem here.
    • The answer to this would be I followed the documentation from Turbosmart which said each spring pressure could achieve a maximum of 5x it's rated pressure so the included smallest spring being the 6psi had a range up to 30psi. I went with the 12 because I figured it'd likely hover around 15psi as a base pressure however I was obviously wrong.    I have a log here that I'll dig out that is purely wastegate and no Mac valve controlling anything.   If it can't hold anywhere near 12psi, does that mean the straight gate is virtually wide open during a run? Or am I thinking about this all wrong.   I could Tee Piece into the cooler pipe pre intercooler where the wastegate gets its feed, and send that to the ecu and see how that reads, I just don't have a spare pressure sensor currently that's all.
    • lol nice, I wouldn't worry about sanding back the filler to check for rust then. Yep very much a thing. Personally I don't do the panel beating, its very easy to have a panel beater sort that out for you. If they aren't doing any prep work the actual panel beating generally doesn't take long at all.  Have you taken before pictures before you started this project? I'd be keen to see the before and afters when you're done.
    • Some good discussion in here, for the most part I can't really add too much to it - thought I'd add some notes to the datalog screen shot that probably aren't news to anyone but a good prop... this is assuming 25psi-ish should be the boost ceiling given the first post refers to 23psi.   To state the obvious, this issue seems super weird.  Turbo speed seems pretty lethagic to build, like the turbo isn't getting as much drive as it needs - and it doesn't help that wgdc keeps rising AFTER boost target then completely shuts duty at a point, which in theory should have the straight gate dump heaps past the turbo and funnily enough causes the huge drop off.  It seems like pretty blunt boost control tuning but I'd not call that the primary issue, so much as possibly not helping the situation. I'm curious, what does a pull look like with purely mechanical boost control?  Like purely wastegate?   There are things in this log and story that make it sound like there could be a significant restriction in the intercooler piping or something - but then it's also overshooting boost target which is NOT what you'd expect with a restriction.   I can see where people are coming from with the non-linear wastegate bypass (not that any valves are linear for this kind of thing), but it still doesn't make sense that it can't hold <20psi on a 12psi spring.    Have you, or can you try measuring pressure pre-intercooler?  Be pretty interesting to see what's happening there vs in the intake manifold - sorry if I've repeated old ground, I've kinda skimmed over but I could have missed something.  In terms of comments regarding the wg spring being closer to boost target, I haven't used a straight gate but part of the reason for having close to wg target is about fighting backpressure as well - I might be wrong, but I'd have thought that part of the point of using a butterfly valve like the straight gate does you actually don't have to resist pressure at all, on EITHER side of the gate.   It shouldn't need too much leverage to start opening, the spring being more to do with where it triggers opening as opposed to resisting boost & EMAP, though smarter people can correct me if I'm wrong there.  
×
×
  • Create New...