Jump to content
SAU Community

Idle Hunting Problem. No Fuel Filter On R33 The Problem?.....


Recommended Posts

So my skyline apparently does not have a fuel filter and it looks like it has been modded to bypass a filter. It has been giving me idle problems over the past few months when the engine gets warm and have yet found a solution to this day... so i was wondering could this be the problem?? i cleaned the throttle body, cleaned the idle sensor, and cleaned the map flow sensor as well as re-soldering the joints inside & coil packs are good. Any advice would be appreciated guys. May need a oil change but have not gotten around to it.

It’s an r33 s2 1996 looks like it had a engine swap for a s1 engine no idea what year though.

Does it have stock ECU? Try an ECU reset and see if that helps.

No fuel filter sounds a little strange. Might wanna put some injector cleaner through it too.

It looks like the stock ecu to the engine (Rb25det) but it was hard wired to the original wire loom in the car instead of changing the whole thing out. Ill get some injector cleaner and throw it in my tank it and try a ecu reset over the weekend. It seems to mostly give trouble when its low on gas after i filled the tank the other day its been fine to drive home and work but its only a 5min trip so ill have to try a little longer trip after the weekend.

Injector cleaner is a waste of money, does nothing. If your having trouble with 1/4 left in the tank, then you might have an aftermarket fuel pump (walbro, bosch etc), they rarely get installed correctly and this is what always happens.

  • 2 weeks later...

Same Scenario with my car! but no probs with idle

I got s2 type m r33 and engine i just got put in had only 88K on clock ( straight from the half cut) its a S1 engine had to do all the loom changes , engine etc etc. took abt 6 weeks to complete!

should i put a fuel filter or just leave it ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...