Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The most frustrating thing I find with MAP sensor ecu's is the lack of capability to accurately tune for altering altitudes or atmospheric pressures. I initially used an atmospheric compensated GM 3 bar sensor, and it would over compensate and run lean at higher altitudes. I've now switched to the Apxei 3.5 bar sensor and it goes the other way.

The Apexi sensor is a far better quality item for accuracy and reaction speed. I've picked up massively noticable throttle response and eliminated a flat spot that would occur during the transition onto boost. This is balanced out by the need to have a completely different map made up when I drive up a hill. The PIM value is changing near on 400-450, which is nearly 1/2 a load band cell group in the vacuum range.

This means a cruise AFR of 14.7 turns into a fat 13.x. Add to this that the air temp sensor is adding more fuel due to the air temps on the tablelands being at least 10 degrees cooler than the coast. This charactoristic is more noticable off boost than on, but I can't really say for sure as I've only driven the range once with the new sensor in the car and it was pretty much all at a slow pace. The on boost load bands change at a PIM rate of 2000 per band.

MAF sensor tunes are SO much easier to get correct, and they compensate way better at altitude as it is measuring air density/temp/volume all at once and all the time. Less drift in tune. Map on the other hand, just compensating with air air temp sensor to predict altered air density just isn't enough. The only correct way to do it would be to use a propper atmospheric pressure compensation sensor, and use the sensor data to alter the MAP sensor value by a % over RPM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
    • Thanks @jtha7 I will have a look around tomorrow but it is a prick of a spot. These are some photos i tried taking 
    • I take it that the knock retard is from bearings tapping a little tune? Thicker oil is a fragile bandaid. You need a much bigger oil cooler and probably the bigger pump being discussed.
×
×
  • Create New...