Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You should have access to the open beta as off now if you pre-purchased it.

Played it for a bit, feels like CSS with uprated graphics. You need to play with the settings though, stuff like mouse acceleration are on by default.

Other than that it plays really well.

  • 2 weeks later...

i bought this last week. was surprised to see it was only $15 on steam. not bad for gameplay. i think the skins need to be updated (t's and ct's are hard to tell apart) and the buy menu is definitely console oriented now. bit annoying that they changed the shortcut keys for a couple of things. still good fun though. havent played cs for the last year or 2 lol

As a CS player since the very first version in 1999 until now, I honestly say, congrats for attempting to botox some life into CS but I must say, it's just simply fcuking gay.

I would not recommend it to anyone. Overall the game seems and feels too animated. Not to mention silencers are out, the gayest tip of the dick is the new decoy grenade (does this even exist? LOL). You throw it like any grenade and it explodes into sound of gun fire for about 4 seconds.

CS Mod - Cool mod

CS 1.0 Stand alone - Good

CS 1.5 - Better

CS 1.6 - Great!

CS:CZ - Best CS out (in my opinion anyway, a good balance of graphics, not too stupidly animated but better than 1.6)

CS:S - Great-ish, better graphics but guns look like Go-Lo toys. This is the tip of the iceberg

CS:GO - A ride in a theme park. Tip of a gay's dick.

When I figured it was released, being a CS player for all these years, I impulsed into buying it, played the first minute in the training mode, was shit. Started a bot game thought it would be better LOL. After a fruitful win in the first round, the second round was an uninstall and delete.

As a CS player since the very first version in 1999 until now, I honestly say, congrats for attempting to botox some life into CS but I must say, it's just simply fcuking gay.

I would not recommend it to anyone. Overall the game seems and feels too animated. Not to mention silencers are out, the gayest tip of the dick is the new decoy grenade (does this even exist? LOL). You throw it like any grenade and it explodes into sound of gun fire for about 4 seconds.

CS Mod - Cool mod

CS 1.0 Stand alone - Good

CS 1.5 - Better

CS 1.6 - Great!

CS:CZ - Best CS out (in my opinion anyway, a good balance of graphics, not too stupidly animated but better than 1.6)

CS:S - Great-ish, better graphics but guns look like Go-Lo toys. This is the tip of the iceberg

CS:GO - A ride in a theme park. Tip of a gay's dick.

When I figured it was released, being a CS player for all these years, I impulsed into buying it, played the first minute in the training mode, was shit. Started a bot game thought it would be better LOL. After a fruitful win in the first round, the second round was an uninstall and delete.

Id be the same I think, not gonna even bother. I starting playing in 1.0, soo long ago now lol.. 1.3 was where it was at :D bunnyhopping all over the place haha. 1.6 was great till they removed the quick scope/nade trick with the awp! :( gave up after 1.6, sauce&CZ were terd!

Miss the days of online, ETG/gamesurge & all the clans some good guys in the community

You are half correct in saying that but if you played CS:S when that first came out, that wasn't very good either. However now it is "perfected" and is a great game.

Give CS:GO a year to sort out all the bugs that come along, and i am sure it can be a great game as well.

However, i have the same opinion like you, it does not have the same feel that 1.6 or CS:S has, feels redone, sluggish, slow. A let down in my eyes.

BTW CZ was the worst imo.

i bought this last week. was surprised to see it was only $15 on steam. not bad for gameplay. i think the skins need to be updated (t's and ct's are hard to tell apart) and the buy menu is definitely console oriented now. bit annoying that they changed the shortcut keys for a couple of things. still good fun though. havent played cs for the last year or 2 lol

yeah thats my only pain with the game... I have NFI which team I am meant to be shooting at haha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I was using the wiring diagram I have So 12.74V is coming into the rear Fuel Pump relay as I measured.  When I turn the key to ON im getting 0.6V to the Fuel Pump plug; which i assume is backfeed voltage and doesnt include the 12V from ignition power.  The rear relay is working and being triggered.  From the diagram I clearly see the rear relay 80 = Rear Relay going into the Body/H loom (R-27) 27 = Fuel Pump plug going into the Body/H loom (T-20) 40 = Short Connector (R-27) I'm reading 12.74V on the blue/black wire which is the power for the Fuel Pump   From this diagram I can see the Ignition relay goes into the front and up to the ignition  2 = Fuel Pump Relay <1M> (R-27) 37 = ING Relay <1M> I started from the pump using this reference Which the way I read it (referencing Nissan wiring color codes) is: Pin Wire Color Function 1 B/P (Black/Pink) Ground 2 L/W (Blue/White)        ECU Trigger 3 SB (Sky Blue) Fuel Pump 5 L/B (Blue/Black) 12V Constant Tested SB to SB on Fuel Pump for continuity - confirmed Tested negative on Fuel Pump to 12V battery and L/B - confirmed 12V Pulled the relay putting 12V between Pin 1 & 2 and testing continuity on Pin 3 & 4 - confirmed relay   So that has me looking at this part of the circuit to understand whats happening here...and im still confused. From best I can tell; the disconnect is back to my previous diagram; between Ignition Relay and Fuel Pump Relay...which yet again; afaik is where the immobiliser should.    Thats what I was trying to explain to GTSboy; im not trying to fix it myself; yet I seem to have to get a Masters in Electrical Engineering (while im busy doing my actual job of DevOps & Cloud Engineering) somehow.  I just wanted more expert opinions; or more so that what I tested is correct and proves it to something around that area; to go back to the alarm tech (for a 3rd time) that he needs to fix it. He keeps telling me its not the alarm. He lives on the complete other side of the city so i understand not wanting to make a trip but as I said before if its the alarm it should be up to him to fix it. But he's adament its not; even though I pointed out the FP was immobilised through the original alarm. To my mind; it seems that the ECU is sending the signal; but the ignition is not getting 12V down the line.       
    • Maybe also really stiffly sprung track cars. Get the inside wheel up in a corner and all the fun stops. Also me sometimes (rarely) when I have to stand on the brake to convince the diff to drive the wheel that is still on the ground when I'm trying to diagonally get over severe driveway entrance, etc.
    • I feel like I'm missing something. You had an authorised installer come out and install a new alarm. Post install the car doesn't start, and you aren't getting the installer back to fix what they did wrong?
    • So either way it is gearbox out and look what is wrong?  I know about the input shaft bearing. Even before swap/new clutch the it sounded exactly like this: So is that inout shaft bearing or the other was installed backwards?  And can some please tell me the part number for that input shaft bearing? The gearbox is small box from R34 N/A and number is FS5W71C. Thank you  
    • I am yet to see anyone ever regret a quaife or helical. ...other than drifting/skidpan duties. I kind of want to upgrade my factory helical with a Quaife (but really it's not ultimately that different, and is a MASSIVE UNDERTAKING), that's how good the hype is about them, that I want to try them 'just to see'  
×
×
  • Create New...