Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How can it lower intake temps, it is only sprayed on to the intake valves. Ethanol would definitely cool the pistons more for a given power output but that just gives you a reason to heat them up some more.

I saw 900 degree temp in my manifold at Sandown running ethanol, if you push hard enough it still can still melt things, just at a much higher output.

How can it lower intake temps, it is only sprayed on to the intake valves. Ethanol would definitely cool the pistons more for a given power output but that just gives you a reason to heat them up some more.

I saw 900 degree temp in my manifold at Sandown running ethanol, if you push hard enough it still can still melt things, just at a much higher output.

How can it not cool the intake charge? Alcohol evaporation will reduce temps

Can you work out for the kids at home how much it will cool the intake air in the microsecond it has before it enters the cylinder, at the speed of sound? I doubt it would even register on your calculator.

Yes the ethanol will cool the charge slightly in the bore but it is a minuscule amount, and would more help slow the air heating imo. (it definitely won't be cooling it down inside there at wot.) If you want to cool the intake charge you would need to spray the ethanol much further back in the intake to give it time to evaporate. I think if you are that worried about the intake temps by that point you have other issues.

We are much better off trying to cool the bore, as that is going to produce more heat than any other part obviously. Direct injection of water into the bore on the exhaust stroke sounds like a better option to me. I will be trialling it soon on a high comp VQ25DD running e85.

It's not the temp in the plenum that matters

It's what reaches the chamber

Alcohol works wonders for cooling, look at methanol drag cars, they don't really need radiators (or very small ones at most) as with big rads they don't get up to temp

E85 won't cool as much as not as much is used (plus chemical differences)

But I'm sure a rich e85 tune would be nearly as good

Cheers for the Input guys, i'll stick with the intercooled E70 setup then. What excites me is a single turbo manifold for the VG30DETT has been developed, and my next engine will have a built bottom end and a precision 6466 hanging off it ;)

Can you work out for the kids at home how much it will cool the intake air in the microsecond it has before it enters the cylinder, at the speed of sound? I doubt it would even register on your calculator.

Yes I could

please correct me if Im wrong but everybody keeps comparing wmi with E85 sure it helps you run bit more boost and timing on boost but I don't believe you will get the OFF BOOST gains with wmi and just how much better your motor runs fullstop on ethanol :)

I think the focal point here is that lower charge temps help reduce combustion temps and its high combustion temps and pressures that help promote detonation - depending on how well developed the engine is to start with .

A .

I can't remember the exact chemically correct AFR for petrol E85 and methanol but I think it comes out something like 14.7:1 / 8.8:1 / and ~ 6:1

Whatever fuel has to vapourise because most fuels as a liquid don't burn too well . Throwing in approx 1/7 of the total charge mass as a vaporising fuel would make methanol a virtual freezer compared to petrol . E85 would be almost 1/10th the charges mass and petrol approaching 1/15th .

I'd say the greater the charges fuel mass is the greater the evaporative cooling will be provided it changes state to a vapor that is .

Can you work out for the kids at home how much it will cool the intake air in the microsecond it has before it enters the cylinder, at the speed of sound? I doubt it would even register on your calculator.

Yes the ethanol will cool the charge slightly in the bore but it is a minuscule amount, and would more help slow the air heating imo. (it definitely won't be cooling it down inside there at wot.) If you want to cool the intake charge you would need to spray the ethanol much further back in the intake to give it time to evaporate. I think if you are that worried about the intake temps by that point you have other issues.

We are much better off trying to cool the bore, as that is going to produce more heat than any other part obviously. Direct injection of water into the bore on the exhaust stroke sounds like a better option to me. I will be trialling it soon on a high comp VQ25DD running e85.

when we say intake air it would obviously be after the injector, how would it possibly be anything else.. the ethanol would be vapour going into the cylinder and have its cooling effect then, if it was anything but atomised/vapour then surely the engine wouldnt be running too well because it would be trying to compress a liquid would it not? I would imagine it would be like throwing some water on a hot pan, instant vapour and reduction in heat .

I doubt drag cars would not have a radiator because there running methanol, wouldnt it have more to do with only running for 400meters and for like 2minutes?

Edited by SliverS2

when we say intake air it would obviously be after the injector, how would it possibly be anything else.. the ethanol would be vapour going into the cylinder and have its cooling effect then, if it was anything but atomised/vapour then surely the engine wouldnt be running too well because it would be trying to compress a liquid would it not? I would imagine it would be like throwing some water on a hot pan, instant vapour and reduction in heat .

I doubt drag cars would not have a radiator because there running methanol, wouldnt it have more to do with only running for 400meters and for like 2minutes?

They generate a lot of heat just from HP but it saves weight and there is enough cooling from the fuel to get them to the finish line. They shut off after that and get towed back.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...