Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi to all, new to this forum but already have read a lot.

So in short, my Stagea has terrible fuel economy during active city driving (~30 liters per 100km) and has bad reaction on the throttle pedal (not always, though).

What has been done already: new maf, new o2, new knock sensor, whole new timing mechanism including both vtc pulleys and all chains, new injectors, new fuel pump with filter and many others.

Has a bigger intercooler, slightly highflowed turbo, 3 inch cat back, a/t transgo kit and cooler.

No leaks in the intake system, checked. Compression ok.

So the main problem is that the car runs 0.8 boost instead of 1.0 pactically all the time, and sometimes (mainly if started up in cold, but not strictly), first 10 minutes after start and warm up it goes 1.0 and pulls really hard.

My idea is that 0.8 boost happens because the car runs some kind of safe map (maybe knock map??), and for the same reason handles the throttle slower and smaller? Does anyone really know, how exactly a signal of knock affect the m35's behavior?

P.S. Sorry for bad English, not my native.

Edited by burkash
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/407829-m35-08-boost-issue/
Share on other sites

First of all, what fuel are you using? 91, 95, 98? With knock, you would see the ecu pull timing, not adjust fuel, I believe. It sounds like you have spent a load of money trying to fix it, which is sad. Might be worth asking one of the guys for a spare stock etc, and swap it over- see if it does the same thing. Could be a bad solder or something in the ecu itself.

As Scott asked, and check engine lights?

Lastly, how are you measuring consumption, and what kind of driving are you doing?

It's interesting that you mention the low boost thing; as I saw this while at the drags this week.

Normally I can stall the car against the brake, and the turbo will spool up to 15psi at around 3200rpm. It pushes hard against the brakes, churns the rear tyres, then takes off like a cut cat.

At the drags; the car would struggle to get to 2500rpm, and boost gauge was still in vacuum (it normally has around 5-7psi boost at that point). Once I'd done my run; I pulled over on the return road and was able to stall the car up as I can on the street.

As the engine was fully up to temp, I believe it is some kind of gearbox protection when cold; and it either retards the ignition timing or valve timing (or both) to limit boost. Once I was off the brake it would allow full boost. Throughout this I had full opening of the throttle.

It also does another thing, if I give it too much of a hard time when cold; it will limit boost to 7psi (regardless of RPM or throttle application) until I pull over, switch off the ignition & restart the car. Then it will give full boost.

I'm assuming this is an extension of the gearbox protection, as the engine will be at operating temp, but the car may not have been driven very far, thus a cold gearbox.

Is there a gearbox temp sender that could be giving erroneous feedback to the ECU, and limiting boost, retarding ignition timing and/or valve timing and giving you woeful fuel economy & performance?

It's interesting that you mention the low boost thing; as I saw this while at the drags this week.

Normally I can stall the car against the brake, and the turbo will spool up to 15psi at around 3200rpm. It pushes hard against the brakes, churns the rear tyres, then takes off like a cut cat.

At the drags; the car would struggle to get to 2500rpm, and boost gauge was still in vacuum (it normally has around 5-7psi boost at that point). Once I'd done my run; I pulled over on the return road and was able to stall the car up as I can on the street.

As the engine was fully up to temp, I believe it is some kind of gearbox protection when cold; and it either retards the ignition timing or valve timing (or both) to limit boost. Once I was off the brake it would allow full boost. Throughout this I had full opening of the throttle.

It also does another thing, if I give it too much of a hard time when cold; it will limit boost to 7psi (regardless of RPM or throttle application) until I pull over, switch off the ignition & restart the car. Then it will give full boost.

I'm assuming this is an extension of the gearbox protection, as the engine will be at operating temp, but the car may not have been driven very far, thus a cold gearbox.

Is there a gearbox temp sender that could be giving erroneous feedback to the ECU, and limiting boost, retarding ignition timing and/or valve timing and giving you woeful fuel economy & performance?

What you're talking about -- it's tranny overheat protection, I saw this several times before installing tranny cooler. This happened each time after driving very severely with flooring after each stop and rushing through traffic with lots of kickdown. The boost became limited to 0.5, and moreover the manual shift mode was unavailable.

Does the engine light light up at any time?

No, if that was so, it could be easier to dig in.

First of all, what fuel are you using? 91, 95, 98? With knock, you would see the ecu pull timing, not adjust fuel, I believe. It sounds like you have spent a load of money trying to fix it, which is sad. Might be worth asking one of the guys for a spare stock etc, and swap it over- see if it does the same thing. Could be a bad solder or something in the ecu itself.

As Scott asked, and check engine lights?

Lastly, how are you measuring consumption, and what kind of driving are you doing?

The fuel is 98. strictly, and from different stations. Even tried some additives, no difference.

I didn't say, but I've already tried to change the ecu, overall the car goes better, but the problem stays.

I measure the consumption in the right way, driving full tank to empty, and then seeing how much fuel gets into there.

As I've said -- I do rather active city driving, but to compare, recently I used a w211 e320 for about a month (3.2 liter diesel engine, 500+Nm and 180Hp), flooring it very often and maybe going even faster than on my Stagea -- I had 11-12 liter per 100. The car weighs nearly the same and has a similar stupid 5AT, of course it is diesel, but not so much difference..

Edited by burkash

What you're talking about -- it's tranny overheat protection, I saw this several times before installing tranny cooler. This happened each time after driving very severely with flooring after each stop and rushing through traffic with lots of kickdown. The boost became limited to 0.5, and moreover the manual shift mode was unavailable.

As I've said -- I do rather active city driving, but to compare, recently I used a w211 e320 for about a month (3.2 liter diesel engine, 500+Nm and 180Hp), flooring it very often and maybe going even faster than on my Stagea -- I had 11-12 liter per 100. The car weighs nearly the same and has a similar stupid 5AT, of course it is diesel, but not so much difference..

I don't believe the issue I had at the drags was an overheat condition. Car had been sitting stationary, turned off for 45mins each time at the track; not a chance it was overheated. Also; my manual shift was unaffected. Also, the problem was reduced once I deliberately soaked some heat into the system; just not enough unfortunately.

In any case, I run a large external cooler; and the car had only driven a kilometre or so.

Comparing your Stagea's fuel economy to that of a Turbo Diesel Merc is not even close to a fair comparison.

To be using over twice the fuel you must be blowing a fair bit of black smoke out the back, either that or you have a fuel leak...

That was not me who said twice :)

Not twice, I suppose 18-19 liters according to the car weight and my driving habits.

Have got no leaks and no petrol smell..

And no black smoke, I mean no smoke that could be seen in the rear view mirror.

Edited by burkash

And to be mentioned, the car also starts very poor, but not always. Sometimes it starts instantly, but mainly requires to hold the key for 2-3 secs. Didn't notice any connection with temperature or any other things.

Edited by burkash

What fuel pump did you install? New stock injectors?

Yes, injectors are stock, 16600aa500

The fuel pump is Walbro, but frankly I don't like how it fitted into the case -- it was 1cm too long, so required some additional work to be installed.

Glad you asked about the pump, please tell me, what pump fits perfectly?

Edited by burkash

Did you do a search before fitting it? There are a few mods required to the pump for it to fit like a glove. I generally use the 342.

The reason your car is running like crap is probably because you never ran direct power to the pump. Walbro pumps require 14v continuous, and the factory fuel pump only gets 8v or so at idle and cruise. Use the original pump wires to power a relay and run some nice thick power wire down to the pump. Make sure you fuse it.

Did you do a search before fitting it? There are a few mods required to the pump for it to fit like a glove. I generally use the 342.

The reason your car is running like crap is probably because you never ran direct power to the pump. Walbro pumps require 14v continuous, and the factory fuel pump only gets 8v or so at idle and cruise. Use the original pump wires to power a relay and run some nice thick power wire down to the pump. Make sure you fuse it.

Thanks, will try to do this today.

Just to save some time, don't you remember the color of wires powering the pump?

BTW, the problem didn't occur with walbro install, it was the same with the factory pump.

The factory pump may have been shagged. Not saying this is the only issue but I have seen many problems with the Walbro's run at lower voltage.

The power wires to the pump at the tank end are black with a yellow line (+ I think) and green with a red line (negative). They are the two thicker wires to the plug.

Where do you live?

There is the option of going for a drive and Logging your ECU including Injector Pulse Width, and then comparing to other cars. Some people have the powers :ph34r:

As long as you don't think your the next Shumi...

The factory pump may have been shagged. Not saying this is the only issue but I have seen many problems with the Walbro's run at lower voltage.

The power wires to the pump at the tank end are black with a yellow line (+ I think) and green with a red line (negative). They are the two thicker wires to the plug.

Thanks, Scott. Will try to do this today. Just to bla-bla, you mean in some situation the car lacks fuel and determines a knock, then falls into safe mode?

Where do you live?

There is the option of going for a drive and Logging your ECU including Injector Pulse Width, and then comparing to other cars. Some people have the powers :ph34r:

As long as you don't think your the next Shumi...

I'm from Russia.

But this could be a good idea, thanks.

Possibly, the o2 sensor should try to compensate to some extent, but generally the Walbro's will make the car run like crap when the pump goes into its low voltage setting. Hopefully the rewire makes a difference for you.

Have you checked all the breather and cooler piping for leaks? Perhaps a pressure test of the intake is in order...

I'm from Russia.

But this could be a good idea, thanks.

Always wanted to go to Russia! I'll log, if you fly and put me up! :P

My walbro isn't direct wired, but my car is tuned for what it is at the moment, and being a non return,is different anyway.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...