Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if you guys are all familiar with the ackerman principle, but bassicaly on all passsenger cars when you turn the wheels left, the left wheel turns more than the right, and vice versa.

Bassically giving you a "toe out" setup around corners to maintain true rolling motion

Heres a good video clearly explaining this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVx_bgI7Ojw&feature=related

Would putting in wrong lenths tie ends alter this in an way?

Trying to imagine this in my head, using wrong tie end lenths would alter the ammount of toe in toe out setting, but should not affect the ackerman principle?

These are the ones I got http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/230854661059?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1439.l2649

For a 1993 gtst

When the mechanic put the new ones in he counted the same number of turns as the old one and the car came of the hoist with massive toe in. about 5cm on each side.

Now 2 wheel alligments later the car feels sloppy when driving straight and wanders on the roads. I know the road geomertry affects all this but it was defintely not like this before messing with the suspension. In fact it was beatifull and confidence inspiring.

Now, For example when braking and accelrating, its just pulling and pushing the wheel in weird ways. the car generally doesnt feel as compotent. Its gone from solid on straights and corners to sloppy and unpredictable in the same roads, same conditions.

I asked for 0 0 toe and i ONLY had the front 2 wheels adjusted or touched.

After the Ffrst alligment, steering wheel was off to the left, second time and whats its on now its off to the right. But even if I were to centre the wheel it still feel sloppy and wonders.

I just wish I left the car alone as the old tie end rods were ok to me,. the only reason I changed them is mechanic said boot is busted.

if the tie rods were adjusted to same toe settings then the rack would be the same length so shouldn't change anything, what was the report from the alignment?, otherwise hey you say they're the wrong ones & the car feels crap, put the right ones on?

Ive used those ones and I havent had problems. Did you have 2 alignments done by the same workshop? They should have straightened the steering wheel to centre either time. Doesnt inspire confidence in their accuracy.

yes both at the same shop. it is a mechanical machine so no before after printout.

it's possible the bushes are worn so they don't keep settings but frustrating that after new tie end rods and alignment car drives much worse than before.

maybe i should try some toe in to see if it feels like before.

im just going to try do my own adjustment

Your getting all flustered about things that aren't effected by the components you've changed

Ackerman is not effected by tie rod length, if the toe is the same as before the pivot points haven't moved.

Why did you ask for 0 toe?

If its a road going car toe it in a total of 1-2mm depending on your preference.

Get a decent alignment on a proper machine, problem will go away

there one of the best quality rod ends about,the mechanic should have measured before removing the old ones and not number of turns because the length may vary slightly,and then tracked it up and as above ackerman is not effected and you need toe in

Its only rod ends they're simple as, no need to measure anything when changing them. Just mark with chalk roughly where they are so its near enough for the new ones and then get an alignment.

Get a front and rear alignment to make sure the car is tracking straight, it may be causing your problems

i recently replaced the tie rod ends myself, got them from kudos, i made the mistake of just counting the turns and bolted it all together,

went for a drive and it was very wierd in the steering, so i checked and the new tie rod ends are a bit longer, and the wheels werent pointing straight at all , so ive adjusted it so the wheels are pointing straight and its driving straight

but i know what you mean, it feels a bit odd now so i guess ill need someone to set the toe in and check it is right. :yucky:

what state are you in? says on that add there for a gt34

Edited by SliverS2

Ok some developments on the issue. First I'll reply to some posts.

Ive used those ones and I havent had problems. Did you have 2 alignments done by the same workshop? They should have straightened the steering wheel to centre either time. Doesnt inspire confidence in their accuracy.

I think the guy doing the first 2 alignments just parks the car with the wheels straight and hopes the wheel doesn't move during adjustment. This was a reputable recommended place and the guy has 30 years experience I was told.

Do you have original caster rods with the old fluid filled bushes?

I have the original caster rods, but I've had white line Poly bushes put in a few weeks ago. Big improvement to stability after that. While the mechanic was doing the bushes he said my tie rod boots were worn so I decided to change them too which resulted in the problems of this thread. I should have stopped after caster bushes car was driving great. The new tie rods brought me nothing but pain and lost money, and probably damage to hubs etc,

Your getting all flustered about things that aren't effected by the components you've changed

Ackerman is not effected by tie rod length, if the toe is the same as before the pivot points haven't moved.

Why did you ask for 0 toe?

If its a road going car toe it in a total of 1-2mm depending on your preference.

Get a decent alignment on a proper machine, problem will go away

Yup, I figured as much but wasn't 100%. The reason I asked about ackerman is because the car felt so funny not just on straights but on corners as well. I now know why though its because the alignment was skewed, and in varying amounts on each wheel.

I asked for 0 0 toe because I haven't found a alignment place I have confidence in and I prefer a more neutral alignment setup. I figured with 0 0 the likelihood of getting too much out of whack is lower.

The three places in my life i have taken my car for a wheel alignment the car has always been worse of and protested driving effortlessly afterwards. The 4 wheel steering on a eunos 800 I had broke a day after getting it aligned at bob jane at their recommendation and my expense after 4 new tyre set fitting and the whole car was crabbing like crazy and steering wheel about 10 degrees off. Went back 3 times and they told me its an old car it cant keep alignment This was back in 2005 and it was a near mint highway driven car that drive like a tron bike before the alignment. After that it went to a tortoise with 3 legs and a tumor and I never resolved the issue because it would have cost $1000s.

there one of the best quality rod ends about,the mechanic should have measured before removing the old ones and not number of turns because the length may vary slightly,and then tracked it up and as above ackerman is not effected and you need toe in

Believe it or not I had a look around shops and ebay for the tie end rods and I decided on those by a long shot just by looking at the pictures. In the pics they looked top notch, looked like high grade steel, great casting, really good manufacture all round. I wasnt disappointed when they arrived. One thing I did not do is ask the mechanic to compare sizes with the old ones though. Dohh....

i recently replaced the tie rod ends myself, got them from kudos, i made the mistake of just counting the turns and bolted it all together,

went for a drive and it was very wierd in the steering, so i checked and the new tie rod ends are a bit longer, and the wheels werent pointing straight at all , so ive adjusted it so the wheels are pointing straight and its driving straight

but i know what you mean, it feels a bit odd now so i guess ill need someone to set the toe in and check it is right. :yucky:

what state are you in? says on that add there for a gt34

I'm in nsw. Shame if you were in syd would've loved to have a look at how ur wheels are sitting.

Take a few pics from above the wheel guards like i have.

iqvsif.jpg

54u6vb.jpg

Anyway above is the alignment after the alignment shop. Whats that like a few mm of toe out on the front left wheel and a lot of toe in on the front right? What kind of alignment is that if a customer asks for 0 0.

I realise this is far from ideal way to check alignment but I'm sure the panels do not vary that much from one side to another. Car hasn't been in a accident and panels look very straight.

So using this crude method to check alignment my uncle got under the car while I told him which direction to turn the tie rods. On the first go the alignment is now 90% back to how it was, the car doesnt feel like a truck without power steering or summersaults in a random direction mid corner. And this is just trying to get the tyres straight by eye!

I still prefer to go somewhere but only to a place that has electronic machine and they show you the readouts, recommend settings and ask you what you want instead of just asking for the keys.

Edited by sadr33

Even if the panels are straight, you cant pick an alignment by pictures, it needs to be measured.

I still prefer to go somewhere but only to a place that has electronic machine and they show you the readouts, recommend settings and ask you what you want instead of just asking for the keys.

Do this, but you'll have to tell them what you want, so they don't just set it at their preferred settings.

20121105 115911



I think you need to go to a specialist in race car prep , i know a guy in brissy who does it and last time the car was 100% better, i wouldnt be confident in the local pedders or whoever to do a good job.. even just by eye mine is driving straight and feels reasonable, just doesnt feel as sharp and settled like before.. Edited by SliverS2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...