Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey peeps,

Iv got an R33 that has recently had an R34 motor put into it by a reputable shop.

Im just wanted to double check that this is going to be fine and be reliable long term.

Essentially its just the R34 N/A (block/head) into an R33 so all R33 stuff including the computer running it.

Is this going to be fine or what?

For example, one thing i have noticed is that (via consult cable) the base operating temp is 85 degrees. Which i hear the R34's were designed to run hotter n therefore have a higher temp thermostat in them. But is this going to be ok with the R33 ECU running the show?

Otherwise the timing map etc of the R33 ecu running the R34? are the compressions and cam duartion the same?

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/413535-r34-na-motor-into-r33/
Share on other sites

Hey peeps,

Iv got an R33 that has recently had an R34 motor put into it by a reputable shop.

Im just wanted to double check that this is going to be fine and be reliable long term.

Essentially its just the R34 N/A (block/head) into an R33 so all R33 stuff including the computer running it.

Is this going to be fine or what?

For example, one thing i have noticed is that (via consult cable) the base operating temp is 85 degrees. Which i hear the R34's were designed to run hotter n therefore have a higher temp thermostat in them. But is this going to be ok with the R33 ECU running the show?

Otherwise the timing map etc of the R33 ecu running the R34? are the compressions and cam duartion the same?

cheers

I may be wrong, but I thought on of the 34s one of there cams were only 234 duration as opposed to the 240 in 33s?

yes id heard there was a difference between the cams.

Tho is the NA motor also different and referred to as the 'NEO'? or only some/later versions? The one i have looks identical and does not have that weird 'lobe' on the pipe going to the inlet manifold like other NEO's iv seen (but maybe that is just a turbo motor part?)

see pic- exactly the same

post-68049-0-09649000-1352699415_thumb.jpg

Hopefully they have changed the ecu for an R34 Neo one (asuming you have a manual trans). Not sure what you mean by weird lobe but R34s have a traction control thingy there (unless your'e referring to the bov). Neos are higher compression and quite a few other differences. Nothing that should be a problem although I think you need the correct ecu (and loom) but problematical if you have an auto.

Nope, no ECU change or anything.

Just a straight motor swap of everything inside the headers...

by that lobe thing i mean this

post-68049-0-14821800-1352853725_thumb.jpg

but then i also see that NEO motors can look like this?

what is what? is one a turbo and one a non turbo?

post-68049-0-73056700-1352853855_thumb.jpg

Top one is det neo, bottom one is NA, looks like you have the r33 intake manifold etc on your Neo engine. It should be fine running all the S2 electronics though probably not as efficiently as it would on the NEO ecu due to differences in the head design.

yeah as i said it is running all of the R33 equiptment (just double checking you are referring to the pic higher up in the thread with teh red engine bay, not the ones posted above...).

Otherwise they have also modded the spark plug signal system as obviously it doesnt use the remote spark sender (i think that is what it is called) that sits at the back of the valley cover next to the fire wall on S1 R33's.

Basically the car runs fine and perfectly and has done for a few thou kms- tho iv only run 98 in it as aware of the higher compression thing. I just want to make sure that it will stay that way into the future!

Only other thing i can think of doing is changing out the thermostat as it is using the R34 one that came with the motor, while if the R33 ecu is running it seeing running temps of the high 80's its going to be winding on the clutch fan pretty hard to try to get it down into the 70's/low 80's as per the R33 parameters?

Anybody on here can comment on what temps they see on the motor via consult to the ECU?

I looked and it is running 86-89 currently with the R34 thermostat in it...

Edited by jjman

I wouldn't be worried about the thermostat, you're talking 5degrees difference between the neo and earlier thermostat opening temps and the Neo is designed to run hotter so you're probably better off leaving it.

alright, sounds good.

tho u sure it isnt going to be pushing the clutchfan harder in order pull temps down that is essentailly impossible because of the thermostat?

Anybody have any idea at what temp the R33 N/A ecu starts pulling timing and adding fuel?

i wouldn't worry about any of that, i put a neo 25 into an a31, ran all the std neo elecs and maifolds etc on an r32 rb25de ecu, ran mint, have sold the car but know it's still going no problem 3 years later

thats what i wanted to hear.

too easy.

Yeah i figured it was all good as it ran fine. Just didnt want to sleep at night thinking there might be a handgrenade in the draveway that i paid good money to have built... :s

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...