Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Cheers Dale. Yes, yes indeedy. :P

Cheers the Bilsteins are set on factory height.

I believe the factory height is 150mm ground clearance? it's now sitting 140mm - going off paper specs? I'm not sure if I'm going crazy but sometimes appears that the back is lower than the front...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/417327-my-pnm35/page/5/#findComment-6928283
Share on other sites

"Yesterday I put on the V35 midpipe, Pics show the difference if you haven't already seen. There is an audible difference, I think it sounds ok from within the car. The pipe is also a lot lighter then the M35 one"

You havent seen a VQ25DD M35/V35 midpipe they are twice as big and bloody heavy. The coupe midpipe is much much better sounds good and is fairly cheap. Car looks nice. QX1 represent! Woo!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/417327-my-pnm35/page/5/#findComment-6930143
Share on other sites

I used to have a metallic brown R31 wagon.

You didn't know how dirty is was, until after you'd finished washing it.

I <3 brown shitbox.

Dale, I'm pretty sure I tried racing you a few times around the mountains back in the day....... LOL

post-83704-0-83945600-1374096168_thumb.jpg

post-83704-0-26217600-1374096188_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/417327-my-pnm35/page/5/#findComment-6932245
Share on other sites

Dale, I'm pretty sure I tried racing you a few times around the mountains back in the day....... LOL

Lol, I remember your blue wagon very well mate. You might also remember my old Gunmetal grey 610 coupe. :whistling:

Several runs up/down OBR?

Only up to the speed limit of course. ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/417327-my-pnm35/page/5/#findComment-6932267
Share on other sites

LOL! so high!! Looks like a tractor! Nice wheels though.

Yeah, it was pretty low in reality, front & rear overhangs are the problem; needed a front lip so badly. Sills are fairly low. Exhaust was really tucked up but still scraped on speed humps.

The front looks high in this pic as it had a fresh set of springs that hadn't settled yet.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/417327-my-pnm35/page/5/#findComment-6932647
Share on other sites

I'm guessing if we CSI'd either of those wagons it'd look like a splatter storm.

Guessing many good times went on in the back ;)

I didn't have 20% tint on the windows for no reason, that's for sure. :cheers:

Apologies for thread derailment, we return to your usual program.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/417327-my-pnm35/page/5/#findComment-6932671
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...