Jump to content
SAU Community

(Vic) '89 R32 Gtr, Excellent Condition, 274Rwkw, Rwc


Recommended Posts

1989 NISSAN SKYLINE R32 GT-R

$21,000 (Price is negotiable for serious buyer)

Immaculate condition inside and out, no expense has been spared on the maintenance and upkeep of this vehicle. I have a file with over $22,000 in receipts from myself and the previous owners dating back to 2005 when the vehicle was imported with 54,500kms on the clock.

It has always had the best quality parts and products used regardless of expense. Very well taken care of and always garaged. Weekend car only and rarely driven, serviced every 6 months or 3000kms with quality parts and oils.

Current tune and work carried out at Racepace Motorsport. Car is currently making 273.8rwkw at 16 psi.

Some of the mods include:

Apexi power FC

Tomei cam gears

Steel wheel standard turbos (fully rebuilt cores and balanced. Car had original factory turbos before being changed to these)

Attain front pipes into a high flow 3inch system with a very original factory look to it

Tomei fuel pump

Injectors from an R34 GTR Nur

Racepace custom clutch

Apexi panel filter

Cusco front and rear strut braces

Toyo r1r tires

Australian standards Immobilizer (installed without any cutting or drilling to maintain originality of vehicle)

A full major service was carried out on the vehicle which included new water pump, timing belt and all bearings etc. All fluids have also been changed from the diffs to transfer case, gearbox, brakes, attessa etc.

In order to maintain the originality of the vehicle all modifications have been completed to the highest standards and to ensure the longevity of the vehicle.

For further details please don’t hesitate to call. All tests welcome and encouraged as the quality of the vehicle speaks for itself. Price is negotiable for serious buyers.

post-96377-0-01568700-1358903876_thumb.jpgpost-96377-0-48708600-1358903915_thumb.jpgpost-96377-0-91970800-1358903925_thumb.jpgpost-96377-0-09913500-1358903940_thumb.jpgpost-96377-0-15330400-1358903955_thumb.jpgpost-96377-0-80148800-1358903966_thumb.jpg

Ian Zero422 739 052

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Trail braking done right, should have the rear unsettled, such that you're actually turning the car by a noticeable amount WITH the brakes, and hence noticeably less steering input.
    • No you don't. Just no more driving in the wet, and clean your window manually before you drive
    • I'm not sure if they tick your boxes, but Haltech would be my pick. I'm an Adaptronic guy from way back, and Haltech acquired Adaptronic to basically get Andy, AND his IP on how he does things like fuel modelling etc.
    • Just on this, as there's a huge issue in your assumption Dose.   The logic you've given, is the same logic old school NA guys give for "needing back pressure" in an exhaust. If you free up an exhaust system, and keep injecting the same fuel in etc, at the same timing, you'll typically drop power. Freeing the exhaust will often make an engine want a little bit more timing, and even sometimes a little more fuel, but then it'll make even more power.   There's many mods people do and "get no extra power" when running a comparison on the same tune. Imagine a car tuned for 91, but now we say put 98 in it, see no difference. But as we now have 98 fuel, you can run more timing, and make more power, as the 91 was knock limited.   So just be very wary in your claim of "don't retune it and do a back to back and you'll see". The correct approach would be tune the car with stock manifold, swap the manifold to aftermarket, and retune it again. But no one wants to do that, and all the results we get are "this was stock, and this is manifold changed and tuned" and people put it all down as just the tune doing it.
    • Unplug ECU. Unplug TPS. Unplug boost pressure sensor. Now, all the wires, placing your ground (black) multimeter lead at the ECU end, measure resistance of the 5V line at the boost sensor plug. Then do the same to the TPS plug. Then do the same for all the other wires that relate to the TPS, or boost sensor.   All of your measurements should be very very low. You're looking to see if wiring is out of wack here.   Secondly, from memory on the R33 (not a neo motor, so I'm assuming an r34) the ground wire for the TPS and boost sensor are NOT equal to ground of the car/battery. IE, DO NOT connect ground of the sensor to the engine/body of car. You'll get a ground loop, and/or potentially screw shit up. In electronics, ground for a circuit, is not necessarily equal to ground of another circuit.   So this leads me to ask, when measuring your 5V, how are you getting 1.5V? Where are your multimeter leads touching for both the red and black lead on the multimeter?   If you're measuring power on the sensor wire, and putting ground on the car chassis or negative battery terminal, that could be all of your issues in "getting 1.5v". Electronics engineers can do some funky stuff with circuits, and when both sensors are on, it's enough laid to alter how the ECU is functioning.
×
×
  • Create New...