Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got sick of my oil pressure reading very low when warm (0 to .5 on the factory guage)

so i decided to replace the sensor. You will need an open ended 17 mm spanner and

you will need to undo a hose clamp (mine was a small socket to undo)

post-70516-0-65539000-1361003613_thumb.jpg

this side of the engine bay.

post-70516-0-96175900-1361003680_thumb.jpg

undo the bottom fuel line hose clamp and slide it off (it is the return line so there is no pressure in this line but some fuel will dribble out so be careful)

post-70516-0-96640500-1361003699_thumb.jpg

this is the fuel pressure sensor about 20 cm below the fuel line hopefully you can see it in focus down there with a rubber gromet over the plug on the left hand end of it.

post-70516-0-49129500-1361003630_thumb.jpg

this is what the plug looks like with the grommet pulled back. fairly easy to remove.

post-70516-0-78326400-1361003646_thumb.jpg

you need to get a 17mm open ended spanner on the sensor to undo it.

this is the new sensor i bought off ebay from nissan of chesapeake in usa. it cost me $95 delivered here.

post-70516-0-94200100-1361003665_thumb.jpg

and this is the end result. a good oil pressure reading in the cluster guage. may not be highly accurate but it would certainly be able to warn you of a problem before it does too much damage.

post-70516-0-86821700-1361004237_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
  • 7 years later...

Afternoon all,

Confirming this guide was fantastic! Oil pressure sensor on my R33 GTR went the other week, ordered a new one off Just Jap.

I used a 17mm stubby spanner from Supercheap Auto ($26 for the set).

I didn't have to remove the fuel line, just pull off the seal boot, unclip it, feel you way around, put the spanner on and undo it. Cleaned up around where it screws in as there was a little oil coming out.

Note, I used some Red Gasket RTV high temp gasket maker to put about 5mm run around the bottom of the screw in bit to then seal it (nissan manual recommends this as well).

Left it an hour, tightened it up and off I went.

Links

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...