Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I want to gather some knowledge about putting and R33(rb25det) engine into my R32 gtst .

Would the 32 stock gear box run fine with the 33 engine , what would I have to look into or change along with the engine ? Would it be worth the conversion ?

Any info, tips or help would be Much appreciated :)

Regards , Michael

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/422827-r32-with-r33-engine/
Share on other sites

Actually the forum is for accumulating relevant information to help everyone. It's useless having 300 different threads all about the same thing, forcing people to read too far and wide for one thing and forcing others to answer the same questions over and over.


If we keep everything in one thread we can make it easy to find information and most people will probably find that their questions are already answered.


Such as:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/83872-r33-gbox-in-r32/?hl=%2Brb25+%2Br32+%2Bconversion#entry1518749

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/397751-r32-rb20det-to-r33-rb25det/?hl=%2Brb25+%2Br32+%2Bconversion

I've got a stock Rb25det with a stock RB20det gearbox.

FMIC, exhaust, pod, 10psi boost, good clutch.

no broken box yet... but I'm not out thrashing the crap out of it.

I reckon that a stock turbo'd RB25det will not break an RB20 box.

with my conversion we used a Stock RB25det ecu which required some wiring work.

there is some work required with the heater hoses at the back of the engine and fire wall area.

Other than that it's all smooth torquey sailing.

Should clarify I wasn't recommending doing it ^ The 20 box is sloppy as all hell, I hate them.

But considering you can't really sell them off for much, I'd say it's more worthwhile to run them into the ground behind the 25 and THEN switch to the 25 box.

For the record the RB20 box is no different to the CA18, SR20, RB30ET etc..

There are plenty of people out there with big power SR's who run the stock box, they aren't tooth picks waiting to snap.. Just need to treat it right.

For myself I will probably look for a billet gearset when the time comes as the money on a second hand RB25 box conversion rivals the cost... And I would much rather have a rebuilt billet box than an old sloppy RB25 box.

Wow 6k I would rather buy a 32 GTR , yeah everything box engine bla bla , I seen a 33 engine close to my area a while back for $1300 , don't know if it includes everything ...

When I am shopping Around for engines what do I have to make sure it comes with , so I don't have any stuff arounds

well it depends on your aspects but you would want a complete Rb25

RB25 (series 1 or 2) 2 has vct! ensure it comes with manifold, wiring loom and ecu. that will get you out of trouble. While its out change heater hoses and put in a new rear main seal and things like that to save you the trouble later when its running.

the rest of the cost will come from things like wiring under the dash as its slightly different etc....if you are not running with a gear box change you could prob pull it in for 3k or so

Mine cost $3500 limp in, skid out.

That was, stock series 1 RB25det, new radiator and hoses, stock series 1 RB25DET ECU, new oil/filter/coolant/spark plugs.

We re-used my good coil packs

Engine was $1500 to buy from a wrecker with 3 months warranty.

ECU was $200

Radiator and hoses was about $200

oil/filter/coolant/plugs was say another $100

So about $1500 for a workshop do do it all.

If you're in Brisbane you can have a drive.

The place where you start burning money in this sort of thing is where you're making decisions on what you are happy to live with after the conversion. Things like - do I want to keep the 20 year old air-con compressor, or do I want to put the new one that came with the engine? If the hoses are different (and they are between RB20 and Neo) then a few hundred goes west right there. Same with power steering.

And the same with the things that people like to freshen up. Water pumps, timing belts, oil seals, water hoses, etc etc. They all add up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...