Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I want to gather some knowledge about putting and R33(rb25det) engine into my R32 gtst .

Would the 32 stock gear box run fine with the 33 engine , what would I have to look into or change along with the engine ? Would it be worth the conversion ?

Any info, tips or help would be Much appreciated :)

Regards , Michael

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/422827-r32-with-r33-engine/
Share on other sites

Actually the forum is for accumulating relevant information to help everyone. It's useless having 300 different threads all about the same thing, forcing people to read too far and wide for one thing and forcing others to answer the same questions over and over.


If we keep everything in one thread we can make it easy to find information and most people will probably find that their questions are already answered.


Such as:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/83872-r33-gbox-in-r32/?hl=%2Brb25+%2Br32+%2Bconversion#entry1518749

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/397751-r32-rb20det-to-r33-rb25det/?hl=%2Brb25+%2Br32+%2Bconversion

I've got a stock Rb25det with a stock RB20det gearbox.

FMIC, exhaust, pod, 10psi boost, good clutch.

no broken box yet... but I'm not out thrashing the crap out of it.

I reckon that a stock turbo'd RB25det will not break an RB20 box.

with my conversion we used a Stock RB25det ecu which required some wiring work.

there is some work required with the heater hoses at the back of the engine and fire wall area.

Other than that it's all smooth torquey sailing.

Should clarify I wasn't recommending doing it ^ The 20 box is sloppy as all hell, I hate them.

But considering you can't really sell them off for much, I'd say it's more worthwhile to run them into the ground behind the 25 and THEN switch to the 25 box.

For the record the RB20 box is no different to the CA18, SR20, RB30ET etc..

There are plenty of people out there with big power SR's who run the stock box, they aren't tooth picks waiting to snap.. Just need to treat it right.

For myself I will probably look for a billet gearset when the time comes as the money on a second hand RB25 box conversion rivals the cost... And I would much rather have a rebuilt billet box than an old sloppy RB25 box.

Wow 6k I would rather buy a 32 GTR , yeah everything box engine bla bla , I seen a 33 engine close to my area a while back for $1300 , don't know if it includes everything ...

When I am shopping Around for engines what do I have to make sure it comes with , so I don't have any stuff arounds

well it depends on your aspects but you would want a complete Rb25

RB25 (series 1 or 2) 2 has vct! ensure it comes with manifold, wiring loom and ecu. that will get you out of trouble. While its out change heater hoses and put in a new rear main seal and things like that to save you the trouble later when its running.

the rest of the cost will come from things like wiring under the dash as its slightly different etc....if you are not running with a gear box change you could prob pull it in for 3k or so

Mine cost $3500 limp in, skid out.

That was, stock series 1 RB25det, new radiator and hoses, stock series 1 RB25DET ECU, new oil/filter/coolant/spark plugs.

We re-used my good coil packs

Engine was $1500 to buy from a wrecker with 3 months warranty.

ECU was $200

Radiator and hoses was about $200

oil/filter/coolant/plugs was say another $100

So about $1500 for a workshop do do it all.

If you're in Brisbane you can have a drive.

The place where you start burning money in this sort of thing is where you're making decisions on what you are happy to live with after the conversion. Things like - do I want to keep the 20 year old air-con compressor, or do I want to put the new one that came with the engine? If the hoses are different (and they are between RB20 and Neo) then a few hundred goes west right there. Same with power steering.

And the same with the things that people like to freshen up. Water pumps, timing belts, oil seals, water hoses, etc etc. They all add up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...