Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ordered a set of Bilsteins from SK, they're on the way. Now, i want to source a set of springs for them.

Requirements: they will go in a R34 GTT, I'm looking for a little lowering (not slammed) and a comfortable ride for the street ONLY.

Current options are King springs (lowered) which have been recommended to me by SK but I'd also like to explore other options, so: I'd also seen on Nengun and RHDJapan there are other springs available - RSR, Ohlins/Eibach, Cusco ... etc.

Would you recommend any of these? OR just stick with King springs?

Furthermore, for example here http://www.rhdjapan.com/nissan/r34-skyline-gt-t/springs you can see that there are many different spring lengths ranging from 180mm to 250mm - i'm assuming this therefore indicates how much lowering I'd get from the spring itself? Difficulty right now is finding what length the stock spring is so that I know which spring to buy!

Edit: just got a reply from King springs themselves about the length of their springs.

KDFL-101 305mm

kdrl-61sp 320mm

Now if you look at the RHD link I have there, you'll see that nothing comes close to that length...so...what is going on?

Help would be much appreciated. Cheers! Chris

Be very cautious. You are probably talking about two completely different types of springs.

The Kings Springs are meant to go on stock (or equivalent to stock) struts/suspension units. As such, they are large diameter (the coil, not the wire) and they are not a lot stiffer than stock. They are stiffer, but given that the stockers are only a few kg/mm, the Kings units are unlikely to be much more than 5 kg/mm.

The Cusco etc springs could well be to suit coilover struts. As such they are about 63-65mm coil diameter and usually are quite a lot stiffer. Common coilovers for Skylines have spring rates starting at 6kg/mm (for the fronts) and many, particularly the Jap brands like Cusco are ridiculously stuff, up around 12 kg/mm. Sure, you can buy 63/65mm springs in all sorts of rates, down to more sensible levels like 5 kg/mm easily enough, but that's not the point. The point is that these types of springs will not fit onto your standard dampers, nor will they fit on SK's Bilsteins, assuming that these are effectively replacement of the same type as standard - ie, meant to take standard sized springs.

If any of the other springs you have been looking at are actually supposed to go on standard type dampers, and they are very short free length, it is probably because they are very stiff. Stiff springs means less suspension travel per kg of load, and if you want to run a low ride height the spring must be short, otherwise the car will sit a million miles up in the air.

I strongly suggest you work out exactly what you are looking at before making any decisions.

FWIW, SK put his Bilstein spec together to work with the Kings Springs rates and I think you would be foolish to use anything other than what he recommends with them.

On a related note, how did you contact SK to get a set of his Billies? I thought he a) wasn't on here any more and b) wasn't doing the Skyline dampers or suspension packages any more. Also, what is the $$ for 4 of his Billies? And, I assume these are not just off the shelf, these have been fiddled with to put his valving in, yes?

Buy the springs Gary has recommended.

It's still possible to deal with Gary his not disappeared from the entire industrie.

I don't believe his doing "kits" like he was anymore but his still building shocks etc.

A lot of people have gone the MCA route now days. Murray's stuff has become the new SK gear. Hopefully Murray doesn't have the same dramas with the skyline community Gary did.......

Murray is more interested in the circuit orientated side and is always extremely busy.

Thanks guys. Yeah I think that I'll just get the Kings, simplest option for now anyway - and if I really want different springs later on I can get them. As recommneded by Gary himself - and yes he hasn't disappeared he's just very busy with his team but he's definitely still doing 'kits' to some extent as he's helped me get my stuff together. I'll have to have a look into this MCA...

IF they are valved anything like the R33 Bilsteins then they will prefer a slightly firmer spring than Kings. I put on the Tein S-tech (medium) springs which are ~20% firmer than Kings and it rides BETTER and handles better. Another member said identical same thing when I fitted mine.

Even better you could sleeve the shocks and get 2.5" ID springs - something like 5kg/mm front, 4kg/mm rear.

Edited by simpletool

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
    • I don't know any details, but I really wouldn't be surprised if they do it as a LHD only version, at least initially.
    • Thanks for the replies everyone. Definitely a coolant push. Oil catch can is empty and always has been. As the engine is out now I'll be having a good look over things. I do have some detonation on the piston tops from a trigger issue back about 5 years ago. I felt it and shut off then bought a new ecu and changed the trigger. Never been an issue since. It never hurt the power, its made almost 80hp more since that incident but I will pull the bearing caps to take a look. If the bearings are damaged I will do a bottom end refresh. Head is being re conditioned at the moment and the block will be cleaned and checked to ensure it's flat. I'll go with a kameari gasket and see how it ends up. The other thing I'm not super keen on is the cylinder colours. I suspect this is from the inlet manifold. The plan will be to put it back together, retune and then stick a plazmaman billet inlet on it and retune. I'm happy with the power, if it makes a little more, then great, but I would rather just make everything more efficient at this stage.
    • Maybe they'll look to do a bunch of presales to help inject some cash fast for their financial issues...
    • Does it also misfire equally when revving?   Josh is very correct in what you should do. The coilpack harness wiring loom itself is a known problem due to its age and the number of heat cycles it has gone through. Throwing parts at a vehicle to diagnose the issue isn't a smart or good way to do it. Secondly, you may have a bad coil pack, you pop replacements in, they fix that issue, but messing with the harness breaks it, so the issue persists. So now you think "well it wasn't the coil packs" and have to continue chasing your tail, potentially swapping back in your shit coil packs and returning the good ones (yes, I've seen people do this because 'it wasn't the problem' and they want to save money). And suddenly, you've got two issues with the same symptoms...   Diagnose, don't use the spare parts shotgun.
×
×
  • Create New...