Jump to content
SAU Community

Strange Dyno Results; Limit Of Safc 2 Or Tuning Fault?

Pattey21

By Pattey21,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Pattey21 Proficient

Pattey21

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hey guys got my car tuned today with my recently installed safc 2. Running a turbotech v2 boost controller.

Some strange things going on here

1. AFRs lean initially even though SAFC 2 was setup for no correction

2. I set the boost the night before on 11psi but first run shows levels just under 9psi and then it goes to 11 again after. Is this the tuner removing it initially to minimise risk of problems before tuning.

3. Graph on initial run is much smoother than the final tune the hump at the end is my main concern, is this just the limit of the safc adjusting fuel and effecting timing or bad tuning or something else.as.i notice the boost drops off then almost mirroring the peak hump.

It just seems weird to me besides the AFRS are better.the boost, power and torque curves look better on the initial run.

post-88652-0-68462600-1365768801_thumb.jpg

post-88652-0-15768800-1365768924_thumb.jpg

post-88652-0-07527700-1365768957_thumb.jpg

Edited by Pattey21
Guilt-Toy Grand Master

Guilt-Toy

Posted
Posted

at the end of the day you have given the guy a piece of shit solution to a problem.

when you tune with a safc you can only move the afm voltage up and down, its never going to be good like a aftermarket ecu.

stop complaining, and buy a decent ecu. congrats you have now learnt your lesson, just be glad a new engine is not needed.

Pattey21 Proficient

Pattey21

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

i am not complaining saying "why isnt my graph perfect" i know what an SAFC does and that its not as good as a standalone, but they have been proven to produce good results for my modifications.

So if any people with previous experince having SAFCs it would be most appreciated.

Edited by Pattey21
NYTSKY Grand Master

NYTSKY

Posted
Posted

Basically the SAFC is just removing the R&R and changing the mixture slightly. It is not optimising the modifications therefore the end result is whatever the engine combo spits out.

Also Anthony is a tuner and a very capable one.

Pattey21 Proficient

Pattey21

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Basically the SAFC is just removing the R&R and changing the mixture slightly. It is not optimising the modifications therefore the end result is whatever the engine combo spits out.

Also Anthony is a tuner and a very capable one.

Yeah thats what i was assuming, cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • brillo
      Leak from Tokico BM50 Brake Master Cylinder

      By brillo · Posted

      Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • oHBoy.
      2001 R34DE

      By oHBoy. · Posted

      Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • oHBoy.
      Starter motor replacment teeth count.

      By oHBoy. · Posted

      Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • niZmO_Man
      J50 clock date suddenly reset to January 1

      By niZmO_Man · Posted

      Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • niZmO_Man
      Wheel Sizes & Offsets For Skylines

      By niZmO_Man · Posted

      8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...