Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Have this famous "1 month" ECU, "23740 0V310" with my rb25det from stagea and going to put into C33 laurel.This ECU have an exclusive pinout, as I've heard. Right?

Does anybody have a info on exact pinout? Google pointed me here on forum.

Thank You!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423944-stagea-wgnc34-ecu-pinout-once-again/
Share on other sites

Hi mate, I'm sure you saw from the other thread, I am also "lucky" enough to have this ECU.

Are you using the matching loom and ECU, or do you need to play with the loom? If you are using a matched ECU and loom you should not have any issues. If you need to change the wiring or ECU like I did it, it is a problem.

I do not have a pinout for it, the changes we made were 1 by 1 testing. If you do find a full pinout it would be helpful. The workshop manual only covers the first pinout, not this one or the last one before series 2.

Yeah I have a loom and ECU.

But lets say that loom is half-cut (

I will trace the injectors, and coils and knock sensors and such stuff on intake side of engine, but MAF wires are cuted away, and there is alot of open connectors on loom, that looks like A/T connectors to me. So the ECU pinout will be usefull to sort things which are crucial to make engine run, and useless wires like A/T or A/C signals.

To start with I've opened a ECU and used a test probe to probe a power and ground pins - they are where thay should be lika on a pic. So far.

pinout1.jpg

In worst case a have a good friend of mine with WGNC34 rb25det running in C33, if he is "lucky" enough, he possibly got the same ECU aswell, but with noncut loom.

After tracing several crucial wires: ecu power ,MAF, coils, injectors, so on... no significant differences were figured out so far.

I'll be placing engine in engine bay theese days and try to plug things on. Will post here if anything goes wrong.

  • 3 weeks later...

Did the swap, wired all using the R34 manual, everything ok!

- Vid of runinng.

Today wired the cold start valve under mainfold, as i can see - its just powered +12, when car is warm - it dies without throttle.

There is an additional valve near the AAC. Here, the purple one:

post-20406-1142855991.jpg

While the AAC is wired to ECU, the second valve on mainfold and "cold idle" under mainfold are not.

Can anybody point me on any info how those two valves should be wired for proper operation. And what purpose the second valve on mainfold for?

Not an expert on this but it would seem according to the write up that the purple piece is part of the AAC valve<br /><br />http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/110431-diy-aac-valve-cleaning-idle-reset/

Not an expert on this but it would seem according to the write up that the purple piece is part of the AAC valve<br /><br />http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/110431-diy-aac-valve-cleaning-idle-reset/

Yeah, thats right, but what exactly it does? Maybe the purple one for compenstaing and indle drop on A/C or something.

Here is the vid with dashboard.

Notice the idle drop just after start. A minutes later it became worse, the idle gone down low, and engine dies without throttle.

Edited by XPbIM3
  • 4 months later...

Giving a conclusion to this thread:

All rb25det ECUs from stagea regardless of their part number have the same pinout. You can find exact pinout in R34 service manual.

However you cannot use early <97' loom on 97+ stagea cars, or even NEO cars, beacuse the loom itself have huge differences in engine-to-chasis loom connection points.

Re-wiring a wire harness to any other RWD nissan is easy but you must trace every wire with care to have everything properly connected.

A blue connector on AAC body is a/c idle drop compensator (FICD)

A brown connector is AAC valve to control idle by ECU.

And the connector under the intake manifold is IACV air regulator, to ensure an easy cold start.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...