Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok iv put a stock 25det into a r32 when driveing around works mint revs up does what a 25det does,

but when drifting usen hard revs it misfire cuts power drops revs to 6000rpm

any body know the proplem dosent feel like a coil or afm proplem feels like a fuel cut

i have no speedo hooked up some one told me it could be the proplem going into a over rev fault code

has any one got experience with this its the 2nd 25 to 32 that has done this both with no speedo's fix the last one with a tune

any help will be appreciated

iv still got to hook up a consult port and i brought a greddy intelligent infometer i hope this could help me find the proplem

at the moment my plan of attack is to loop the neutral switch put in a 25 speed senser run the output to the ecu

i dont want to get a tune because motor is getting pulled out in afew weeks to make room for a 250rwkw sr20det

You cannot run the speed sensor direct to the ECU. The speed sensor outputs an AC signal at +/-1V or thereabouts. The speedo head converts that to a 0-5V square wave signal, which is what the ECU is looking for.

The very simple solution, as it always has been, it to fit a bloody speedo.

No. Don't piss about. Just get an R33 speedo out of a wreck, wire it to the box and the ECU, tuck it up under the dash and be happy.

As for Paul, the R34 ECU definitely has a bunch of zero speed protections built in. Looking at the stock manual bin file in Nistune, max RPM with zero speed is 4500. Map TP with zero speed is 96. It is fair to bet that Nissan had similar protections in the R33 ECU too, it's just that we can't go look inside so easily.

I don't think they do have no problems. I think they run into the exact problem you have. If you use a PowerFC or other ECU then no problem.

With respect to cutting pin 53......there may be a difference between having no signal there at all (not even the circuit connected) and having it connected but not pulsing. The ECU may be able to tell the difference. I don't know with R33 ECUs particularly, because they are useless in all regards I've never been in a car that has one!

If you want to use a cable drive speedo with R33 box in R32 you're going to need to use the Navara drive mod to make it work. I did it to mine, it's not hard, although the speedo cable ends up with a nasty short radius curve in it down near the box/chassis rail afterwards.

Edited by GTSBoy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, I still don't know why the idle speed control can't catch the falling RPMs. In the Consult logs I see the AAC duty cycle rising, but suddenly it goes lean and the engine stalls. Anyways, the relevance here is the DW 550cc injectors are probably the same. So if OP has similar issues I would be tempted to finger those injectors as problematic for whatever reason vs the ECU failing for some reason.
    • Yeah, sort of blurring two different things together, aren't we? I just meant O2 feedback closed loop. I used to have a 0-1V LCD meter on my dash, wired directly to the O2 sensor signal. So you could easily see what it was doing. Normal running it would flick back and forth nicely. Slow down to an idle and it would keep flicking, as the ECU tried to servo to maintain stoich, but it would slow down as each swing happened until it would stay at one end of the scale. As I said above, the sensor heater is not enough to keep it hot enough when there is also little heat in the exhaust flow. Give it a blip and it would start swinging again, then peter out again. Meanwhile, idle speed control would run just fine, because unrelated.
    • It's not even O2 feedback, it's just simply when the ECU sees the closed TPS signal for whatever reason the idle will start steadily dropping until the engine dies. With the TPS adjusted to not trigger closed TPS it will idle at some ridiculously high RPM and something like 6 degrees of timing. In the absence of getting eyes on it personally and a lot of quality time doing diagnostics I couldn't tell you what the real problem was but it was interesting nonetheless
    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
×
×
  • Create New...