Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yesterday I installed my new tension arms, lower brace, steering rod ends and coilovers ( all japspeed). Fitting was easy, but I'm running into problems aligning everything. I've adjusted the tension arms so the wheel is exactly centered in the arch (a few degrees positive), and trying to adjust toeing now. Strange thing is that the wheels are still facing inwards a bit, but I can't shorten the steering rods any further.. if I push the wheels back with the tension rods, it gets better, but that makes the caster go negative..is there a different way to affect the front toe?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/427119-r33-gtst-toe-alignment-issues/
Share on other sites

Can't see whats wrong there, it's fitted correctly and the rods should be the correct ones according to japspeed.

20130617_065956_zpsddb676db.jpg

What I'm going to try tonight is raise the car a cm and push the wheels back a bit.
The car used to stand like this:
292363_481995421880150_117211904_n.jpg
Looks like it definately had negative caster, but it's hard to know for sure. Does anybody know the dimensions it's supposed to have horizontally from the center of the wheel to the front and to the rear of the arch?

Edited by sstennizz

10mm longer, so I compensated that on the tread of the rod, .. but then still had to add the rest of the tread.. So it's not really the end that's the problem.
And about the rack ends, what I don't understand is why they'd sell the rod ends if you end up needing different rack ends as well?

My guess is that it has to do with the caster. I'm starting to think the wheel isn't supposed to be dead center in the arch. But slightly to the rear. Though haven't got anything to compare it with. Images I find on google of side views show the wheel damn near dead center, but might be heavily modified..

Have you actually measured caster, or are you just guessing that fore-aft movement results in a certain amount of +/- caster? For one thing, your car may have been owned and driven by a 6-toed moron who liked to crash it into kerbs and the front crossmember might have been moved on it's chassis rail bolts. That can cause the wheels to be fore or aft of where they're supposed to be.

True. I'm going to check the angle today, see where it is exactly. My guess is that is just has to move back a bit. We did some measuring and a degree in caster is barely visible without measuring. We'll see. Planning to have her aligned next wednesday. First have to mount the hicas lockout bar. Better get front and rear done at the same time, instead of having to go twice.. ;)

Things I know for sure:
My front caster is damn near 0 degrees
20130617_163036_zps9087448f.jpg
Pushing it back makes it go negative and improves the toe angle, pulling it forward towards the required 6.4 degrees makes it toe in even more.

My wheels are clearly visibly toeing in
20130617_163416_zps539b141a.jpg

There is some cambering
20130617_163359_zps59b05d6b.jpg

There is no more adjusting left on the steering rod ends
20130617_065956_zpsddb676db.jpg
20130617_163319_zpsc4108acb.jpg
20130617_163202_zpsf72e8af6.jpg

What can the alignment shop do that I'm not seeing right now? I thought negative caster was bad for driveability, but that seems to be the only way to get it done. And now at least I know for sure that the previous owner(s) where driving with a buttload of negative caster, since the wheel was pulled back at least a couple of cm's on the old short springs and shocks.

Could be they fitted the wrong tie rods somewhere in the past and decided to counter act that by giving it negative caster? As I understand some other series use the same thread just different lengths?
I don't think the subframe is out of position, since the bolts are exactly where they are supposed to be. Anyone know the standard length of a R33 track rod? I know the new ends are 15mm longer, but on the old setup (with the negative caster) that still gave me plenty thread to realign. On the right caster though i can never get it aligned. What I'm going to try today is lift the car up about a cm and pull the wheels a little more towards that 6 degrees. The caster right now isn't enough yet to pull the wheels straight again. When cornering now I really need to turn them straight myself, otherwise I'll end up on the side of the road.. I was thinking about adding some thread to the stock ones, even though there's not much left on the rod to put thread on and shortening them a couple of cm's.
Japspeed is now trying to get me to buy their track rods as well.. Which I didn't intent to.. Why sell rod ends if you end up needing the rods too??

My guess it that somebody fitted the wrong length tie rods and to compensate for length difference, they pushed back the caster.
What I did::
- Old tie rod / end measured how much thread was left.
- Removed old end
- Measured old and new ends (new one 15mm longer) which gave me approx 15mm free space on the thread.
- Replaced Struts / tension rods (about 10mm lower than before).
- Caster to just positive (should actually be around 6 degrees, but thats for the alignment shop, as long as it's not negative)
- Fitted the new ends and adjusted so that it compensated the length difference

- Toe-in... A lot..
- Tried adjusting the tie rods, but dead end.. And still toe-in..
If i now press the caster backwards, it actually decreases the toe-in and actually starts pulling the rear of the wheel inwards, but also makes the caster go negative.

Subframe is not moved or bent (deviation is identical on both sides and subframe is still neatly on the mounting bolts), and I can't find any bent rods or arms (would be a huge coincidence that both sides are equally crooked).
On soc they just state that I should have bought the tie rods as well, because it won't work with standard tie rods (why the hell to they sell just the ends without mentioning it then?).
I now have a few options. Buy the tie rods from japspeed and hope I can get them shorter, shorten the ones I have now and lengthen the thread on them, or shorten the new ends which then makes them a lot less reliable.

Does anyone happen to have a loose R33 tie rod, to measure the length from the rack to the end?

S14/R33 ones are 290mm

the issue here is the rods on the rack not the caster, people even run 10degress of caster ( say 6 more then "center" ...)

rack ends might be from another car or lock spacer, so too long and of course i'd assume that the rod ends are adjusted all the way, make sure the rubber boot isn't hiding some more thread on it

i think cefiro rack ends are m14 and are the same length as the s13 with is shorter so if all else fails give that a go

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...