Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

which year/s are the series 3 models?

I seriously wonder how people found out answers to questions before the internet existed when now that we have the power of this awesome tool, people still can't be bothered......

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=v35+skyline+wikipedia

If you read it carefully you would have notice it mentions three model updates.

S1 = 2003

S2 = 2004

S3 = 2005

The coupe was one year behind in these updates, so +1 to the years above,

Alternatively:

http://www.jlimports.com.au/nissan-skyline-350gt-v35-coupe

Again, google is your friend of yours. Laziness is not a friend of mine.

Clearly Laziness is......because its wrong according to the two issues over hyper rev I have and Amamaya.

series 1 are 2001-2003MY series 2 is 2004-05MY and series 3 coupe only was 2006MY

they did updates every 18 months - 2 years.

no wonder this group gets the reputation of being called v-tards

Edited by Howaitonaito

Clearly Laziness is......because its wrong according to the two issues over hyper rev I have and Amamaya.

series 1 are 2001-2003MY series 2 is 2004-05MY and series 3 coupe only was 2006MY

they did updates every 18 months - 2 years.

no wonder this group gets the reputation of being called v-tards

Coupe wasn't released until 2003 - retard.

Back to bolting shit panels to average cars for you.

If you read it carefully you would have notice it mentions three model updates.

S1 = 2003

S2 = 2004

S3 = 2005

The coupe was one year behind in these updates, so +1 to the years above,

Alternatively:

http://www.jlimports.com.au/nissan-skyline-350gt-v35-coupe

Again, google is your friend of yours. Laziness is not a friend of mine.

"the coupe was one year behind these updates, so +1 to the years above", implying that you are talking about the sedan being the only other shape in the V35 series?

"the coupe was one year behind these updates, so +1 to the years above", implying that you are talking about the sedan being the only other shape in the V35 series?

Correct.

so to put it more simply for you.

Sedan:

2001 = released

2003 = update

2004 = update

2005 = update

Now as I said before (and as you have quoted), the coupe was +1 year behind these updates - but obviously not released until 2003. So......

Coupe:

2003 = Coupe released (S1)

2004+1 (2005) = Coupe updates (S2)

2005+1 (2006) = Coupe update (S3)

The specific differences of each model year are detailed in the link I posted here:

http://www.jlimports.com.au/nissan-skyline-350gt-v35-coupe

What do you want? Another lesson?

How about.....a lesson on the difference between facts and opinions?

Facts are statements that are irrefutably correct and supported by empirical evidence. Example, the things that i wrote above which you said we're incorrect so I directed you to some sound sources of evidence to prove my statement - thus making them facts.

Opinions are subjective statements belonging to the person expressing them, open to discussion or justification should the person choose to do so, but ultimately will have no right or wrong answer.

I'm not going to waste my time proving how putting stagea panels on a skyline sedan looks shithouse, despite you having kindly supplied supporting evidence - ergo, a 'fact' - so i guess we will keep that in the 'opinion' category.

That concludes today's lesson.

Okay then here is my opinion:

-You precious white coupe is nothing special.

-try getting coilovers or lowering it, uour passengers get sea sick.

-Your a deadset waste of space and was clearly dropped at birth.

All bow down to the new leader of the V-tards....you may all kiss his ass!

All this coming from a SAU VIC member.......tsk tsk tsk

Asshole

What do you want? Another lesson?

How about.....a lesson on the difference between facts and opinions?

Facts are statements that are irrefutably correct and supported by empirical evidence. Example, the things that i wrote above which you said we're incorrect so I directed you to some sound sources of evidence to prove my statement - thus making them facts.

Opinions are subjective statements belonging to the person expressing them, open to discussion or justification should the person choose to do so, but ultimately will have no right or wrong answer.

I'm not going to waste my time proving how putting stagea panels on a skyline sedan looks shithouse, despite you having kindly supplied supporting evidence - ergo, a 'fact' - so i guess we will keep that in the 'opinion' category.

That concludes today's lesson.

Ahh yes; because the internet is the last bastion of factual information. :rolleyes:

If you are implying that a car importer (essentially a used car salesman) can be held up as an irrefutable source of facts relating to cars; do I have a deal for you!

My very good friend; I would like to tell you a story about my brother who, as it happens; is a Nigerian Prince! He would like to share his immense wealth, and give you 17 million dollars! :yes:

There are however a couple of small things you will need to do to help him. :whistling:

I could spend 5 minutes on the internet and give you such facts as;

1; You can charge your iPhone in under 30 seconds, simply by putting it in the microwave!

2; All pizza delivery guys end up screwing incredibly hot women, who never seem to have enough cash to afford home delivered pizza.

3; "Liking" things on Facebook CAN CURE CANCER (also helps with poverty).

4; Will's & Kate's baby is a newsworthy event.

EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE! :woot:

Stop it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...