Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

This is one of my first posts on this forum but I have been a member for a while and a lot of this information has been very helpful to me. However this one issue I am having I cant seem to find any answers for?

To begin, I have an 1997 r33 Series 2 that is completely stock besides a cat back. The previous owner put an atmospheric BOV which I had changed with haste to the stock one. It has been having crazy fuel consumption issues (getting 200-250kms to a full tank) and blowing a bit of smoke. It also lost power at high rpm when I booted the car, as if the car instantly lost boost and made a rapid fluttering noise out the exhaust. Since changing bits and pieces such as new PCV valve, new valve seals, compression test shows 135 across the board, new spark plugs gapped to 1.1mm and today, a replacement AFM. The smoke has almost completely disappeared and the fluttering noise had gone as well as fuel consumption has been much better (200kms to half a tank). This is where the problem has appeared.

I ran a diagnostic test using the paper clip method only a couple weeks ago and my ecu showed everythign was fine, (code 55). Since replacing the AFM however, I ran another check and the code 34 came up which is my knock sensors. The funny thing is I cant hear any pinging or knocking when im driving and if anything there is a slight noise which is barely audible near the turbo after a good drive when its idling (I dont know if this is considered knocking as I have never heard knocking before, kind of sounds like the heat shield is cooling down or osmething because the knock is very intermittent and doesnt sound at all like marbles in a tin can). I only hear this when the car is idling or on turbo timer and only if i open the bonnet.

When replacing my AFM I was a little pissed off cause my hands are too big and i couldnt reach the one stupid bolt connecting the stock air box which is under the solenoid without risking it falling into the engine bay somewhere so I ended up shoving it in as hard as I could and i suspect i could have accidentally damaged the wiring to the solenoid.

SO my question is, are there any other reasons as to why my ECU could be showing the fault code 34? Could it have been my roughness with the air box and fiddling around that somehow damaged the wiring on something (like the solenoid) that could have confused the ecu into thinking the knock sensors were effed? Or am I kidding myself and it actually is the knock sensor? Ive read that knock sensors need a good thrashing ot actually not work properly, So i dont see how mine all of a sudden "don't work"?

Any suggestions, advice or ideas would be appreciated!

Thanks for your time!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/429231-fault-code-34-knock-sensor-issue/
Share on other sites

First up, your current fuel consumption is pretty well correct, so no need to keep worrying about that side of it.

Secondly, the loom to the knock sensors is on the other side of the engine from the boost solenoid, so the possibility of you doing anything to the wiring for them is approximately zero.

Thirdly, the noise you hear at idle after a run is stuff cooling down. Knock happens under load. Won't happen at idle 9unless there is some very severe shenanigans going on - far more severe than you need worry about).

The knock sensors (or probably just one of them) may have just chosen this moment to commit suicide. There is a recent thread on the topic of trouble shooting them by bypassing with 500 Ohm resistors that may be worth your time reading.

There is some small possibility that you have damaged the wiring to the boost solenoid and the ECU is confused about what exactly has failed. I just raise this as an extreme outside chance kind of thing, because I can't think of a real method for it to happen besides blaming the impenetrable R33 ECU for things we can't see.

Oh, snap. You're right. I might have actually made that same mistake when I posted in the other thread recently. I'll have to check. I actually knew it was kOhm....but I live in a world (at the moment) where I talk to people who drop the kilo off of a lot of units they use. Like they say cal (calories) when they mean kcal (kilocalories) and I fall into their bad habits. I skipped right over your 470 kOhm vs 500 Ohm unit difference!

--edit -- I just checked. I did too. Bastard!

Edited by GTSBoy

Yeah maybe I'm being a paranoid f*** thanks heaps for your contributions. Maybe ill try sorting out the boost solenoid when I get some cash and do a diagnostic test in a bout a month or so, see if the problem still persists. But yeah I thought as much about the cooling down business, the car is definitely not making a knocking noise under load, I guess I'm alright until I hear it ?

No, you can have enough knock to damage an engine without it being audible over all the other noise. If you're very worried, then you should run it up on a dyno with someone who knows what they're listening for (and has the necessary equipment even if it is just a length of hose) to see if there's any knocking.

Did you use the correct AFM? Off the top of my head the series 1 and 2 are different AFM units. > Series 2 are same as R34.

1. Does it drive fine now?

2. Reset the ECU and re-run the diagnostic. If the knock sensors are stuffed then short them out.

Hey guys, yeah the afm is definitely the correct one.

I ran another diagnostic test and the code has gone now?

The car runs fine now, idles smooth drives smooth but, besides that, I ran into another problem that's really getting to me. I've searched and searched all over google and forums and stuff and I can't find a decent answer to my specific problem.

As I stated above I've replaced my O2 sensor, AFM, and spark plugs.

Ran a comp test and showed 135 across all 6 cylinders. Ran a smoke test and found one vacuum leak which I sorted which has sort of fixed my loss of power in the high rev range. I have new valve seals as I rebuilt the cylinder head, and I have replaced my old turbo with another second hand turbo ( as I thought it was turbo seals that was te issue)

Now what happens or should I say has always happened is whenever I drive down a hill or something and I press the accelerator a puff of black smoke comes out of te exhuast. This happens intermittently as sometimes the smoke won't come out until I've gone we'll past the hill and come to a stop. Sometimes it will slowly puff out when I'm idling after I've fanged the car or after I've gone down a hill.

My fuel consumption is normal getting about 400kms a tank roughly and my oil level isn't going down so its either burning minuscule amounts of fuel or oil. I don't know. The smoke is black mostly, but I'm not sure if there is tinges of blue in it. But it's definitely not white smoke. Or white-blue smoke.

Now from what I've researched, I've done about 80% of what needs to be done to fix this issue so far.

What I'm wondering is if the crank angle sensor, fuel filter, injectors or fuel pump might have anything to do with the smoke?

Tomorrow I will try out the electrical tape method around the coil packs if they have a split or something.

The reason why this bothers me the most is that my car is stock as a rock, has been since purchase besides a 3" cat back exhaust. Stock r33s shouldn't be blowing smoke like this right ?

Anyway once again any advice or suggestions would be much appreciated! Thanks.

  • 2 years later...

Resurrecting old thread because I have a related issue.

I just disconnected the CAS to crank and fill out the oil lines without starting, and needed to clear Code 11 & engine light afterwards.

In addition to Code 11 I also got the following two codes on Nissan DataScan:

  • Code 17: ABS-TCS control unit circuit apparently – TCS has never worked since manual conversion, not sure if there's a fix? Luckily ABS does
  • Code 34: Knock Sensor circuit

Resetting the ECU cleared 11 and 17 but code 34 reappears each start.

I take it that my knock sensor is dead, or is there possible cause for this? Car is an R34 GTT and moderately modified.

Disconnect knock sensors and measure resistance back from knock sensor plug to ECU plug. And measure the resistance of the knock sensors themselves and report back.

Thanks I'll look into that.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...