Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I get what you are saying, my problem is still that the people who are not having kids due to money, probably still wont because the money they are getting is not going to go that far. Where as the ones with the high income never had a concern anyway as they had the money to withstand a year off work anyway. There will be a part of the pay scale there where the maths will work out and some one could go from not affording children to affording children but I am not sure it is that big.

In any case it looks like we will get to find out if it works or not in the near future

  • Like 1

Ah, but there is a direct inverse correlation between income and number of kids. And the research suggests it's higher income earners who put it off or have fewer kids for financial considerations. Yes they can afford the time off but they are less willing to give up the income than a lower income worker is.

Ah, but there is a direct inverse correlation between income and number of kids. And the research suggests it's higher income earners who put it off or have fewer kids for financial considerations. Yes they can afford the time off but they are less willing to give up the income than a lower income worker is.

They are still going to be giving up income at some stage...unless of course they actually do want to get back to work so bad that they drop the kids off at day care at 6 months old. So is it really going to entice them into kids?

And as for does it work, it will need a decade or so to start to reverse trends in birth rates.

If you see a sudden uptake in women in middle class jobs falling pregnant it will give you some idea if it worked or not

so coalition just said there will major cutbacks on overseas foreign aid dollars spent....bout bloody time! look after the people here and the veterans and pensioners who got this country along through their working life and taxes and now some cant even afford the rising cost of electricity!! sorry to those that have to live in 3rd world and attrocious circumstances but its time to focus on our country that needs attention.

I certainly appreciate what I have and get in life but we work hard for these things and contriute to the tax system accordingly to help this country and citizens.

If you see a sudden uptake in women in middle class jobs falling pregnant it will give you some idea if it worked or not

Random occurrence could be a spike in the numbers for other reason. Needs to be a prolonged increase to have validity.

Random occurrence could be a spike in the numbers for other reason. Needs to be a prolonged increase to have validity.

Thats why i said SOME indication. I have a science degree, I am all for stupid amounts of evidence before confirming something lol.

I have voted now, so I can go back to giving no f**ks

Thats why i said SOME indication. I have a science degree, I am all for stupid amounts of evidence before confirming something lol.

I have voted now, so I can go back to giving no f**ks

So do you work somewhere in the field of science? Just for interests sake, not having a go...

I have 2 friends with science degrees, both make less than the quoted $72k average, and both are lab supervisors. 1 at a uni and the other at a very large pharma co.

So do you work somewhere in the field of science? Just for interests sake, not having a go...

I have 2 friends with science degrees, both make less than the quoted $72k average, and both are lab supervisors. 1 at a uni and the other at a very large pharma co.

I work in environmental management, I would never work in a lab in a million years for the very reason you mention there, terrible pay

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...