Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been chatting at work to a bloke who's got a damn good mind!

I want to know if there is a sensor avaliable to show pressure in and electronic signal?

We want to put sensors before the turbo(s); between the turbo(s) and the intercooler and between the intercooler and the inlet manifold (or in manifold, which ever is easier)...

What, how etc etc?

Any thoughts/ideas etc?....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43271-tech-heads-need-some-answers/
Share on other sites

http://www.autospeed.com/cgi-bin/browse.cg...oduct=888800079

Pressure/Vaccumn switch, basically it won't give you a measurement, but you can make it trigger at certain pressures.

its a start, it also has links to some articles that might give you or your mate some ideas.

Bass Junky, permanently... We wanna rig up a digital display that shows what the air goes into the turbo at; what it comes out of the turbo at (turbo effieciency or whatever you call it) then what it goes into the manifold at (ie what loss is caused through the pipes and intercooler etc....

Don't really wanna spend a fortune converting the car to MAP for that you know?....

just need 3 lil sensors that we can plumb into the pipes to send the pressure as a digital signal....

Does that help?

You dont need to convert the car to MAP based management...

A map sensor is a small, relatively cheap device that converts a pressure signal (ie from your intercooler plumbing) to an electrical signal...

Stock 33 boost guage is driven by a MAP sensor...

funky, I had a look at that and it looks good too...

I was just picturing something cheap and simple that could be tapped into the pipes like the O2 sensors in the dump pipes.... any thing like that? is that what a MAP sensor would be like?

Permanently: You would then have to weld little lugs to the places you want the signal to be taken from and then attach a MAP sensor to each lug.

From there you would have to output that signal to some sort of display unit.

I can't really see this as being a cheap thing to do......

The alternative it to plumb up three seperate boost gauges....

I think Autometer now have digital readouts which have the outputs from two sensors displayed on the one guage. You can configure them to be whatever you want. (might not be autometer.... but it's someone.

BASS OUT

Yeah, the drilling/welding shouldn't be too expensive if we know a welder though should it...

We're going to design our own display unit, using the 3... so the 3 boost guages would be a waste of money....

So how much do you think it would be for the 3 MAP sensors?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...